“WHITE GIRL BLEED A
LOT”: THE RETURN OF RACE RIOTS
TO AMERICA (Book
International D, 2nd ed., March 2012, paperback)
By COLIN FLAHERTY
Rev. by Hugh Murray
The book is
simply a series of reports of Black flash mobs crashing into stores, grabbing,
insulting, robbing, beating, and occasionally sending whites to hospital or to
the morgue. On one level, this book is
quite boring, for it is the same story told and retold again. It is the same story in Philadelphia, San
Francisco, New York, Miami, Myrtle Beach, Indianapolis, Charlotte, Texas, New
Jersey, Milwaukee, etc. The stories are
variations on the same theme, how can young Blacks humiliate whites, destroy
their property, steal, beat, and then run away.
Black racism, Black on white hatred, Black on white crime, Black on
white violence is an epidemic in America.
This part of Flaherty’s book is solid.
Unfortunately,
the response to these crimes is usually as repetitious as the crimes
themselves. Local newspapers generally
refuse to identify the race of the perpetrators. The author is able to do so by using Youtube
videos, often posted by the criminals.
They are proud of their violent crimes against whites (sometimes,
against Asians). One amazon reviewer
dismissed the content of the book, maintaining it was anecdotal and not accord
with the FBI’s hate crime statistics. In
Milwaukee on July 3, 2011, a groups of Blacks ransacked a gas station’s
convenience store. They then rampaged in
a nearby park beating and stealing from whites, who were there to view the
fireworks. Police were called and came
to the scene. However, because of the
politically correct sensitivity to minorities, even sensitive to those engaging
in crime, the officers refused to file reports of the crimes. If there are no police reports of the Blacks
attacking whites, then the crimes do not exist, and these crimes are not
included in FBI or any other statistics.
Does one expect the Eric Holder Justice Department (the one that dropped
the voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party) to investigate
possible anti-white racism in a police department that permitted them to ignore
the violent crimes by Blacks against whites?
Only after some of the whites were treated at hospital and called talk
radio did local TV reports begin to expose the Black racist assaults. Finally, [white] Police Chief Ed Flynn
conceded that some “fights” had occurred.
Flaherty snidely commented, “’fights,’ which is a curious way to
describe a race riot where some of the victims actually tried to defend themselves.”(p.
120) One of the white gals was slugged
so hard, that her blood evoked the comment that inspired the title of this
book. Mayor Tom Barrett, a liberal
Democrat, and Chief Flynn, an import from New York, denied these were hate
crimes, assured the city that crime was colorblind, and decried those who
sought to “sensationalize” the occurrences.
Flaherty
has amassed a book of crimes – crimes by Blacks against whites, and a few of
Blacks against Asians. Flaherty recounts
page after page of Black on white hostility, insults, theft, beatings, some of
which may have led to emergency treatment, and sometimes to the grave. Page after page. Boring to read; painful to read, distressing
to read of such injustice perpetrated so often by violent, Black racists,
depressing to read how the crimes are not reported in the press, or not
reported as racist crimes.
Josef
Stalin, the Soviet dictator, observed that the death of one person is a
tragedy; the death of a million is a statistic.
Unfortunately,
in the US it becomes harder to acquire accurate statistics of Black on White
crime. If you simply read the local
newspaper accounts of most of these incidents, all of the racial animosity and
motivation is removed, deleted, expunged, censored. Why are Americans not supposed to read about
the massive hatred and violence against whites committed by Blacks?
Black mobs
are not identified as such; they are roving groups of “youths,” “teens,” “young
people,” indulging in unseemly behavior.
These are not hate crimes, and race has little or nothing to do with
it. Of course, the reality is NOT what
is reported. The reality is that young
Blacks engage in insulting, threatening, beating, and robbing whites. But the major media do NOT want to reveal
this basic fact. Flaherty finds the
facts – on Youtube, where the color of the crime is visible and often posted by
the proud Black racist criminals themselves.
Why do the
national and most local media cover up the criminality of Black mobs? On this question Flaherty is silent. He clearly exposes the media cover-ups, but
fails to ask why.
To answer
this question, an older book might be more helpful, William McGowan’s Coloring the News: How Crusading for
Diversity Has Corrupted American Journalism. Beginning with the large-scale Black riots in
hundreds of American cities in the mid- to late-1960s, the liberal analysis of
events was encapsulated in the report of the Kerner Commission. Basically, the blue-ribbon panel blamed the
riots on white racism, excused the rioters, and urged changes to prevent future
outbreaks. Universities, which became
the think-tanks of the Left developed theories to exculpate Black violence;
they were “culturally deprived,” they were victims of institutional racism, and
their outbursts were simply a means to cope with such oppression. Furthermore, Blacks could not, by definition,
be racists. They might show prejudice,
but racism required power, and since Blacks in America lacked power, they were
incapable of being racist. Only white
racism was the problem. Of course, if
you walk alone on a street at night, who has the power, a Black with a pistol,
or you? And in the era of President
Obama and Attorney General Holder, who does have the power? Moreover, if this definition made any sense
and were applied elsewhere, then Afrikaners, by definition, can no longer be
racists in the new South Africa.
The
Left-wing theories of race spun by academics were popularized by the
media. In the journalism and
communications departments of universities, students were taught that as
reporters they were to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Objective reporting was deemed not merely old
fashioned, but immoral. The reporter was
to take the side of the oppressed. And
in race reporting, that meant coloring the news for the benefit of Blacks, who
were by definition, the oppressed. And
so academe and the media melded into the academedia complex.
Other
issues were also fused with the new, politically correct mission of the
communication majors. For example, as
the method of affirmative action became clearer in practice, (basically a way
to give the job or scholarship to a lesser qualified or unqualified minority
and deny it to the best qualified, if he were white.) To justify these practices of denying equal
opportunity to whites, the Left developed the theory of “white male
privilege.” According to this, all
whites were privileged, and to create a level playing field, preferences had to
be granted to minorities, even rich ones.
The whites who did not understand this justification, were clearly
racists, and probably deserving of a Fanonesque tutoring session (i.e.,
violence).
The
curriculum of schools has changed drastically to incorporate many of the
Leftist theories. No longer is the West
applauded as the center of a civilization that freed many men and women of
drudgery, that provided light throughout the night, that sped people and goods across
a continent on rail, and even in the air, - now the West is depicted as
oppressive. Whites smashing the
wonderful civilizations of the Aztecs, of Africa, of wherever. And white oppression must be fought. Multiculturalism is the glorification of all
cultures – except oppressive, colonial, racist, white culture. The West became the enemy in many of America’s
schools.
So the
“youths” who roam about lurking to beat whites (and sometimes Asians) are
simply affirming what they have been taught in their multicultural curriculum
and in the general media. So, poor,
raped, Tawana Brawley – persecuted and raped by the KKK policeman, for a year
was a page-1 story for Rev. Al Sharpton to inform reporters about the evils of
whites. It was a hoax; but the Left did
not care. Think of all the educational
material that Rev. Sharpton could present to the cameras during that year. And poor, O. J. Simpson – that white bitch of
a wife was receiving OJ’s alimony to squander on that Jewish waiter! They surely deserved what happened to them –
whoever might have killed them. Another
big racial even occurred in the Howard Beach section of New York City in which
a Black was killed by autos as he fled a group of angry white youths. Even a year following the event, there was a
television movie about it to remind America of white racism and its murderous
consequences. Yet, at about the same
time, in Milwaukee a white youth, fleeing a group of Black youths, jumped in
Lake Michigan, and drowned. There was no
publicity about the death of Maldonado in Milwaukee. Maldonado was just a white. Instead of running to the lake, he should
have simply let the Blacks beat the s___ out of him, and then he might still be
alive. The media and those who control
it could not state blatantly the main difference between these stories. One is a rare example of white racism; the
other an all too common example of Black racism. The media choose the spotlight the rare
example, hoping to convince that it is the common type of racism. The media also dismiss the more common type
of racist attacks, because that would show Blacks in an unfavorable light. The media rationally choose the stories that
they will emphasize. They choose those
stories that fit their ideology. So, they
provide massive coverage to one story, and bury the other.
Even though
his mother was white, most people view Barack Obama is Black. George Zimmerman had a Jewish father and an
Hispanic mother. But for the Leftist
media, like CNN, Zimmerman was identified as the “white” who had brutally
murdered the young Trayvon Martin. The
point of the Leftist media was to show a wicked white racist murdering an
innocent young Black. That story fit the
Left-wing agenda. Zimmerman resided in a
neighborhood recently targeted by burglaries.
He was part of a neighborhood watch, seeking to keep his neighborhood
safe. However, the Left objects to
that. (To the Left, if you want to live
in a safe neighborhood, get rich and live in a gated community. The poor, according to the Left, should have
to endure the crazies, the muggers, the rapists, and the Trayvon Martins.) The Left vigorously opposes the 2nd
Amendment and the right to own arms to defend oneself; one’s loved ones, one’s
property. Whatever happened in the
confrontation between Zimmerman and Martin, the Left media sensationalized the
event seeking to make it into a racist white killing an innocent Black. I was not there to witness the event, and it
is possible that Zimmerman shot Martin without provocation. However, there are other possibilities. Noteworthy, the Martin family has sought to
keep Trayvon’s school records sealed. He
had been suspended for several days, and there were indications that he was
involved with drugs and stolen property.
Is it not possible that Trayvon was casing the neighborhood when
Zimmerman caught him? But, young Blacks
cannot be guilty when confronting a “white” (or even an Hispanic-white)
according to the ideology that dominates the academedia complex. Noteworthy also, when the New Black Panther
Party called for the apprehension of Zimmerman, dead or alive, this
threat did not stir the Department of Justice to protect Zimmerman. After all, Obama marched beside leaders of
the NBPP in Alabama and he also shared a platform with them. Some members of the NBPP have called for the
murder of all whites, men, women, and children.
If Obama could share a platform with them, and have his Attorney General
Holder dismiss a lawsuit against the NBPP, why would his Administration object
to that party’s threats against the Hispanic Zimmerman?
If our
media were doing their jobs properly, there would be no need for Flaherty’s
book. Because the media, on race issues,
are dominated by Left-wing ideologues, they consciously try NOT to report
stories unfavorable to Blacks. When the
story becomes too big to suppress, then the media spins it to distort, with the
objective to make the Blacks appear in the most favorable light.
What would
happen if the media reported honestly?
The Left would have “the community” (Blacks and some radical whites)
march on the station, organize boycotts of the sponsors’ products, gather
signatures from academe and tax-exempt Leftist groups like the NAACP, the ACLU,
for law suits, demand firings of the honest reporters, etc. The station would quickly cave, and to prove
its sincerity, it would grant a large contribution to some of the protesting organizations,
fire the reporter or have him sent to an appropriate re-education center on
sensitivity training. The station would
also promise that in the future no such honest reports would be aired.
Sadly,
since the 1960s, one cannot report the truth about race and crime in the major
media in America. Flaherty’s book is not
published by a major publisher. One can
read about these incidents daily in some internet sites like Jared Taylor’s
American Renaissance. He includes clips
about racial crime in the US, and in addition, racial conflict and crime in
Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, and other nations.
Those old
enough may recall black/white photographs from the 1930s of refugees fleeing
Nazi Europe. The pictures make one
sympathize with the victims of the bullying, belligerence, and terror they
endured in storm-troopered Europe. With
WWII won, America’s economy turned from building tanks to automobiles and
consumer goods, and this nation embarked upon a period of great
prosperity. Some could now afford cars,
and even new homes in the suburbs. But
others preferred to remain in the neighborhoods they knew from childhood. They did not want to move to the green burbs;
they preferred to stay near the church their parents had helped build, the one
in which they had been confirmed, been married, etc. Then came the riots of the late 1960s. The threats, the shots, the burned cars,
burned buildings, beatings. The Blacks
doing this did not wear fancy storm-trooper uniforms, but they were just as racist,
just as threatening, just as brutal. Now
many more whites found it necessary to flee the city. Like the Jews of Hitler’s Europe, they had to
leave, sometimes quite quickly, out of fear.
They often suffered financial loss in the process of a fast relocation. Yes, they went to the burbs, and often loved
it; like the Jews who came to America and loved it. But many of these whites were driven from
their homes. White flight was a
reality. While the academedia complex
can only envision white racism, it was the brutality of Black racism that
caused many to flee. (Jack Cashill’s Sucker Punch: The Hard Left Hook that Dazed
Ali and Killed King’s Dream describes how Black racism led to the collapse
of his home neighborhood in Newark, NJ, in the late 1960s.)
What were
whites fleeing? Black racism. Black crime.
Black “culture” (loud, noisy music, vulgarity, shouting, arguments,
hatred of whites, etc. Why is there such
crime? Because liberal judges do not
require Blacks to abide by the same rules required of whites. If they commit crimes, their punishment will
often be lighter. A Black who attacks a
white can get away with it. So why not
do it? It will not make news. It is deleted from the newspaper. If it does make news, it will somehow be the
white man’s fault. The Black is
exonerated. OJ was declared not guilty
and across the nation Black university students cheered. (Stick it to whitey!)
Also
telling, shortly after being elected President, Ronald Reagan was shot and severely
wounded by attempted assassin John Hinckley.
The crime occurred in Washington, D.C., a city overwhelmingly Black in
population. A jury was selected to hear
the case – eleven Blacks and one white.
Rather than convict the attempted murderer, the jury found him not
guilty due to insanity! Do you think
that jury would have reached a similar verdict had Hinckley attempted to
assassinate Obama?
Flaherty
writes about the past two years, atrocity after atrocity. So many attacks by Blacks against whites that
it no longer seems a tragedy, but a Stalinist statistic. What might the numbers be? Though she includes all crimes and all races,
Ann Coulter includes an important paragraph in her new book, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the
Seventies to Obama - “Between 1960 and 1973, the number of FBI index crimes
– which are serious offences such as murder, rape, robbery, arson, assault,
kidnapping and burglary – nearly tripled from 2,019,600 offences a year to 5,891,924. Hundreds of thousands of Americans had to
die, be raped, or have their property destroyed or stolen because liberals had
some neat new ideas about crime.”(p. 12-13)
Happily, not all Blacks have taken up the war against whites. Many Blacks prefer peace with white people. But too often Blacks vote for the liberal
politicians and judges who refuse to crack down on Black crime. If they are jurors, they too often vote to
let guilty Blacks go free.
Recall
Stalin emphasized how one can conceive of an individual death, but not the
death of a million. That is a
statistic. Yet, Flaherty’s endless
recording of one after another attack on whites by Black racists has a more
powerful impact. The whole is greater
than the sum of its parts. It is not a
single incident, but the cumulative effect of reading about attacks on whites
by Black racists. Equally important, the
equally cumulative effect of the consistent cover-ups and lies by the mass
media and the government officials to hide or excuse the Black attacks.
What has
happened to America in recent decades is a tragedy. In reality, the elite have encourage Blacks
to make war on whites. It is a war
consciously ignored by the academedia complex.
It is a war encouraged and subsidized by the extremely wealthy
foundations (most of which are dominated by the Left). It is at present a one-sided war, for only
one groups is involved in the aggression.
The other is victimized. The
media pretend there is no war. The
politicians appease the aggressors. Statistics
and tragedies.
Despite the
flaws of typographical errors, misspelt and omitted words, despite the lack of
analysis and index, despite the sloppy look and oversized print, White Girl Bleed A Lot provides accurate
description of the continuing race war that the mainstream media consciously
refuse to report.
On August 13, 1920 Marcus Garvey presided at the convention of the United Negro Improvement Association held at Madison Square Garden in New York City. There he promulgated the Declaration of Rights of the Negro Peoples of the World. Its 54 points comprise the farthest thing from a fascist manifesto.
