AMERICA'S DISINTEGRATION?

 

DISINTEGRATION: INDICATORS OF THE COMING AMERICAN COLLAPSE

By Andrei Martyanov (Clarity Press: Atlanta, GA, 2021)

Reviewed by Hugh Murray

     On December 1, 2021, Vice President Kamala Harris met for the first time with the leaders of the new U.S. Space Force. She outlined the Biden Administration's position on space, essentially continuing most of the Trump policies – however, there was to be one major new emphasis: “Climate Change.” When I heard this on the news, I laughed, and then was saddened. Why? First, because there were news reports in October 2021, a month before VP Harris's address, stating that the Chinese had launched a hypersonic missile around the earth, and when it returned to China, it came within a few kilometers of its target. That was major news. Later in mid-November 2021, Gen. Mark Milley would call the Chinese success “a near Sputnik moment,” meaning that the US was as stunned by the Chinese advance in 2021 as the Americans were by the Soviets launching the first satelite on October 4, 1957. Further information released in November was that such missiles travel at over 5 times the speed of sound, and can carry nuclear weapons. Because they travel so fast, radar may not be able to detect, much less defend against them. In 2021 we were entering a new age of weaponry. And VP Harris ignored the “sputnik” of 2021 to urge us to prioritize climate change!

Another reason I was saddened by Harris's remarks is because I had recently read Martyanov's short, excellent, provocative Disintegration, published in 2021. As a foreigner, Martyanov's sentences seem overly long, repetitious, but as a foreigner he views America in a different light, revealing weak spots often oblivious to us who live in our milieu. Indeed, he often sees weaknesses where we assume there is strength.

Is America's economy #1? Martyanov thinks it is padded to appear stronger than it is. He questions the position of FIRE, finance, insurance, real estate, in estimating the size of an economy. He thinks those bloat the statistics, and contends an economy's real measure is how it makes things. He blames Pres. Clinton, who was supported by the elder Pres. Bush, in passing trade legislation like NAFTA, and worse, working to get China into the World Trade Organization. The effect of these, especially the latter, was a giant vacuum cleaner to remove American industry and send it to China. With its cheap labor, one-part system, China would become the work-house of the world. And China would make things. The Council on Foreign Relations reported, ”While the US real economy started its prolonged dive, China's grew 8-fold since 2001.”(p. 84) America imports finished products from China, while we export petroleum and gas and agricultural products and chicken feet to China. Martyanov describes America becoming a 3^rd world economy.(90)

In her Feb. 23, 2022 article, Ann Coulter wrote: As Americans discovered to their dismay when the pandemic hit, we can't make our own masks, pharmaceuticals or aspirins. We can't make our own computer chips, razors, toys, sneakers, Levi's jeans...But boy, do we make weapons!” She mentions 4 large corporations who have earned huge contracts with the US government over recent years – Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing.

Martyanov agrees with Coulter, to a point. But he questions now, how good are some of the weapons we make? And the ones we sell to NATO, Saudi Arabia, and other allies? He goes into detail about the commercial airliners that were American made and the stars of the skies. Boeing, when they updated one, they did not properly redesign it, trying to accommodate new factors on old designs improperly, skimping here and there, paying off so it looked liked they passed all the tests. Results, Boeing plane crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia resulting in hundreds of deaths. There followed law suits, the loss of sales and confidence while many air fleets were grounded in the desert. Is the same shoddy quality going into military aircraft?

Martyanov believes that the US is losing the arms race. He notes that on 14 April 2018 Syria shot down 70% if our Tomahawk Land Air Attack Missiles. Our weapons were not getting through as easily as they had in the past. It is not only on the offensive. After the assassination of Iranian General Suleimani, in retaliation Iranians fired missiles to attack NATO and US bases in the region. Shock: their missiles got through. It “demonstrated the impotence of U.S. Defensive anti-missile technology which failed to intercept a single Iranian ballistic missile.”(166)

Following WWII America did not win the Korean War, nor the one in Vietnam, not in Yugoslavia. Martyanov adds that America has lost all its wars in the 21^st century. Is he correct that the the balance of power has changed?

America is a naval power and the gems of the fleet are the air-craft carriers that defeated the Japanese in the war for the Pacific in WWII. Martyanov concludes that with the arrival of hypersonic weapons, the American super-carrier is dead as a viable weapon.(163) Such missiles changed warfare forever.(164) Radar could not track, much less defend against such weapons, and the huge carriers would be easy targets and sunk.(165)

Well, what about our submarine fleet? The New York Times 8 November 2021 reported: “Metallurgist Admits She Falsified Test Results for Steel Hood. She was testing the metal to be used in hulls of American submarines, letting the lesser quality steel pass tests, and thus, endangering the lives of the seamen, and in nuclear subs, perhaps the lives of many others. Elaine Marie Thomas falsified strength and toughness tests from1985 to 2017. How many subs did her subversion infect?

VOA News 14 July 2021 had an interesting report too. Seaman Apprentice Ryan Mays was charged with setting a fire on the ship Bonhomme Richard while it was in dock in San Diego. The fire destroyed the warship, a loss of $1.2 billion and $4 billion to replace. One might blame recruiters, but more important, who was in charge? How could one man start the fire and no one noticed for days while the ship burned until lost? Perhaps the officers were out checking on and climate change.

Martyanov's point is that the US is not necessarily the most powerful military on earth any more. And our economy? Bloomberg reported in 2019 that manufacturing had reached the lowest portion of the American economy in 72 years.(107) We make less, and we lose the skills that are honed in making things. We complain when other nations fail to import large numbers of our automobiles – Ford, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, these were once the envy of the world. Martyanov notes that the American car manufacturers no longer dominate their home market. We export treasury bills and dollars; that is we export inflation. We are a seafaring nation, yet when constructing large commercial container ships in 2016, we produced 10; the rest of the world 1,408.(53) In steel, China out produces us 11 to 1.

He admits the US has some of the best universities in the world, and we lead in STEM Ph. D.s, but of those 37% are temporary visa holders; 25% Chinese nationals. He brags that the STEM doctorates in Russia are Russians. Moreover, despite Kamala Harris's talk of stressing STEM studies, how can the US maintain any lead when more education departments declare math to be “racist,” and it is racist for a white to give the correct answer in class, and some question if there is any one correct answer or even any truth. Is postmodernism compatible with STEM? Is a woke dominated educational system?

I certainly do not agree with Martyanov on many issues. He believes the US is no longer a nation – but a multicultural cacophony of rival tribes, nearing full Balkanization. Not only does the West not make things any more, it has ceased to produce babies. He blames decadence, gays. Yet, China now has a demographic problem too, and it has not had a pro-gay policy under communism. One need not agree with all of his assertions; Martyanov is provocative. His book surely contains insights that we should ponder if our NATION is to survive and thrive again.

I bring another point of contention between us related to his title. In 1960 seven of us participated in the first lunch-counter sit-in in New Orleans, We were arrested, found guilty, and became convicted felons. Our purpose was to allow Blacks to purchase coffee at the counter like any other patron of the store. The word of the time was INTEGRATION, to treat people without regard to race, color, or creed, to stress Pres. John Kennedy's declaration that “our Constitution is color blind,” to live in a land where the children of Martin Luther King would be judged by their character, not by the color of their skin. These ideals of integration for all citizens would surely have made our NATION stronger. However, these ideals were subverted by champions of division, treating people differently, quotas, racial preferences, diversity, and now equity. Martyanov contends that the multi-ethnic, racial, cultural, approach will end in a divided land, as Yugoslavia sundered into various smaller warring nations. I argue when you treat all equally, integrate without preferences for this group or that, then you can have a strong, united NATION. We can avoid disintegration and grow again.

POOR WHITES IN FILMS - SOME RAMBLING THOUGHTS

 Another site had a short article on films that portray poor whites sympathetically.  I have seen none of the films mentioned in that article.  I did leave a comment, and repeat it here, wherein I mention 3 films that I thought included interesting portrayals of poor whites.  Hugh Murray

I saw it years ago, but "Th Outsiders" 1983, with all the young stud actors of the era is one example. The protagonists were not the wealthier ones. Poor, but sympathetic. Not the Okies of the 1930s trekking to California who might wrather wine to grapes.These Outsiders were Okies who were outsiders because they had little money, poor whites. The film helped make several of the players stars for a decade, or even longer.

Even the young Nick Cage film Valley Girl (also 1983) has some of the conflict between poor and mid-class whites, but it is far more romance than social commentary.

Two years later, 1985, from the UK, a surprisingly un-politically correct film was shown: My Beautiful Laundrette. Some have wealth, but they are immigrants from Pakistan. The whites are poor, all at some point skin-headish, some remain so. Daniel Day-Lewis plays one of the poor whites, who gets a job working for the immigrants, as he had been a school-chum with one of the young immigrant lads. These two become lovers. Day Lewis may even have a flirtation with one of the female Pakistanis too. Who exploits whom? Which community exploits the other? It is not the simple, p.c. answer. Which group is more lawless? Heartless? Surely, you will not find a film on race relations in America to be so nuanced.

On the other side, the Texas Chainsaw Massacre films and their derivatives depict totally unsympathetic poor whites.  I assume the new West Side Story portrays the white Jets in similar strokes to the Puerto Rican gang, but have not seen it.  Most Hollywood films portray middle-class and above.  Poor whites are not as glamourous according to the lords of film.  When I was young, decades ago, there were many films made by Republic Pictures and Monarch Pictures, westerns.  The heroes and villains of these films were middle class or poor.  But the Western genre that was still so popular on tv into the 1960s, has disappeared, except for a special once in a while, with different values, Broke Back Mountain, or now Power of the Dog.  Poor whites now are more likely PBS specials on drug addiction, crime, racism.

Another genre, particularly when I was young, was the war movie. Indeed, a real war hero, Audie Murphy starred in both war and western films. The war film did not center on class, and as most of the services during WWII had been segregated, blacks may not have appeared in these films. I saw them decades ago, but if blacks appeared, they were in unimportant roles. Class differences might be discussed, but as back-story, what they did before volunteering or being drafted. The back-story might have been merely oral, or it could have been a short visual to accompany the soldier's story. More common was the assimilation: the Italian, the Irish Catholic, the Jew, the Hispanic, and of course, the WASP. In these films, the melting pot melted the ethnicities into a fighting unit for the nation, as they de-emphasized their backgrounds, ethnicity, and class, thinking now of the next assault they would make against the enemy. Yet, of these early films, the one I recall most is From Here to Eternity, in which Frank Sinatra plays a boxer who does not want to continue fighting, while the sergeant wants him to fight and win for his unit. Not class, not race, not ethnicity, but a rebel heart, a maverick who rejects the sergeant's desires that he fight, win, and bring the unit a trophy. The sergeant punishes Sinatra sadistically. All this ends when the Japanese attack Pearl Harbor. In these war films, class was de-emphasized, race did not exist, and ethnicity rallied round the American flag.

WHY AMERICANS SHOULD NOT HAVE BOYCOTTED THE BEIJING OLYMPICS OF 2022

      Many compare the Beijing 2022 Games to those of Berlin in 1936. In the US, there were many voices demanding a boycott of the German games. If they had won, if the boycott forces had succeeded, it would have been a truly German dominated Olympics. The world would never have heard of Jesse Owens, and Metcalf and the black American track stars who defeated Europe's best. The crowds in the Olympic Stadium shouted Owens' name as a hero, to the chagrin of Nazi officials.

The Berlin games provided the locale for the greatest Olympic film, that of Leni Riefenstahl. Moreover, during the Games, many of the anti-Jewish signs were removed, so Jews could go to places that had become forbidden to them. Richard Plant noted some gay bars were allowed to reopen too. By attending, the Americans proved to be excellent athletes, and diminished the hopes of the Germans. And Berlin was a slightly freer place for a short time.

Had we boycotted Beijing in 2022, as we did Moscow in 1980 under Pres. Carter, the only ones to really lose would have been our own athletes. I voted for Trump, and I am glad the US did not boycott the Beijing Olympics in 2022.

Hugh Murray

MORE RACISM FROM THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION & OPINION OF ANN COULTER

Many may find it hard to believe the teaching of hatred against white people now occurring in the USA.

 

The anti-white racism of the Democrats (and liberal Republicans) is more than teaching to hate whites in schools (like the Nazis did against the Jews in Germany in the 1930s. Indeed, in January 2021 I was already comparing the beginning of Biden's term in office to that of Hitler's term as Kanzler.) 

 

But it is worse than just teaching hatred. The hatred of whites was clearly shown by Biden's Administration early on when vaccines first became available. 

 

Who should be first to get the vaccines? All data indicated that the most vulnerable group was the elderly, for among the elderly, of those who got the virus, about 5% would die. 

 

So the medicrats thought that the elderly should be first to get vaccinated. But then the left-wingers noted, the elderly are too white. Can't give them priority. 

 

So the medical workers, many of whom are people of color, they would be #1 in line, and then the elderly.

 

Science does not rule in the medical bureaucracy - left wing politics does.   

 

Let more of the elderly die - they are too white anyway! 

 

That is only one aspect of life in Biden's America, where teen and young Black criminals are released from jails to cause more violent crimes, where some can walk into a store take what they want from counters, NOT PAY, and walk out knowing they will not be prosecuted, and will keep their stolen goods. 

 

The Black Lives Matter rioters and their allies, the Antifa(scist) groups set fires to stores, looted, injured many cops and others, even killed some, and got away with it. Kamala Harris (now VP) contributed to their bail funds. 

 

When I watch the TV news now, I see the decline of America, like a Roman in 400 AD watching the collapse of the Roman Empire. 

 

Biden is the worst President of the USA, and if the next election is stolen too, he will be the last President of the USA, as there

won't be an America left.    Hugh Murray

 

Enjoy Ann Coulter's article below.

 

Ann Coulter: Desantis Shocker—It’s Not OK To Hate Whites!

 

Ann Coulter

01/26/2022

Gov. Ron DeSantis is pushing a bill through the Florida legislature to put a stop to the modern pedagogy of making little girls cry because they’re white. The bill, called “Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Act (WOKE),” prohibits classroom instruction that contradicts these concepts:

• “No race is inherently superior to another race”;
• “An individual, by virtue of his or her race or sex, does not bear responsibility for actions committed in the past by other members of the same race or sex”;
• “An individual should not be made to feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress on account of his or her race.”

The left has been having a sneer-fest over the proposed law, howling that it protects “white people” from feeling “uncomfortable.” SNOWFLAKES!

E.g.:

“A bill pushed by Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis that would prohibit public schools and private businesses from making white people feel ‘discomfort’ when they teach students or train employees about discrimination in the nation’s past …”—The Associated Press (emphasis added)

 

“The right likes to talk so much about, you know, snowflakes. It seems like they may be raising snowflakes because if they think people are going to be uncomfortable by the actual facts—facts are uncomfortable.”—CNN’s Don Lemon

“Ron DeSantis and his GOP allies are pushing a bill … that would prohibit public schools [from making] white people squirm. Those poor, wittle babies.

 

Their feelings are hurting. Some poor, wittle white people are uncomfortable about the hundreds of years of racism and hate that built this nation.”—Laura Washington, Chicago Sun-Times

(Saving the best for last …)

“[H]e’s trying to make it illegal, Governor Ron DeSantis, to teach history that would make white people uncomfortable. Does that law include saying you can’t make black people feel uncomfortable or indigenous people? The history of indigenous and African Americans could make one uncomfortable? Is that illegal too, or is it just white people?”—MSNBC’s Joy Ann Reid

To know the answer to Joy Ann’s question, you’d have to actually read the bill. Or an article about the bill. Or commentary on an article about the bill. Joy Ann Reid: highly literate and well-informed Harvard graduate.

 

But, duh: A bill prohibiting the teaching of race hatred will primarily prevent the teaching of white hatred for the simple reason that it’s the only race we’re allowed to hate. Not merely allowed to hate, but taught to hate, encouraged to hate, paid to hate.

 

We’re now entering the sixth decade of open, widespread, official discrimination against white people on the basis of their race.

 

Even the Asians suing Harvard dare not stress the humungous advantage given to blacks and Hispanics. No, their beef is about white applicants getting preferential treatment over Asians.

 

This is odd, to say the least. According to the plaintiffs’ own expert witness, an Asian with a 25% chance of admission to Harvard would increase his chances to 36% if he were white—but to 77% if Hispanic, and to 95% if black.

 

Asians sure have assimilated to our culture!

 

Everybody’s copacetic with the idea that universities discriminate against white people—in abject defiance of the clear language of our civil rights laws. They have done so, loud and proud, at least since 1973, when Allan Bakke was rejected from the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, because he was white.

 

In fact, no one under the age of 50 has ever lived in an America where universities and other elite institutions have not discriminated against whites. Three generations of hating whites are enough.

School districts around the country teach white children that they were born racist and assign books like, “Not My Idea: A Book About Whiteness,” that portrays “whiteness” as a contract with Satan.

 

So yes, a race-neutral law that prohibits teaching race hatred will, in practice, prohibit teaching hatred of whites because that’s the only race-hate that’s taught.

 

Liberals jeer at whites who object to this constant disparagement, calling them “poor, wittle babies.” Does the left have any self-awareness at all?

 

A 6-year-old girl is a total pussy if she can’t take a little abuse for being white—at a school her parents are paying for. But our entire country has been turned upside down for the past half-century to prevent any other race from experiencing a fleeting moment of discomfort.

 

Historic Confederate statues are torn down and melted; newspapers refuse to identify the race of criminals—or even show photos of the arrestees; the Oscars will not consider a movie for Best Picture that does not have 30% non-whites.

 

Otherwise, black people might feel uncomfortable.

 

Professor Amy Wax of the University of Pennsylvania Law School is routinely threatened with suspension or firing from her tenured position for stating facts about black students’ performance. Her remarks make black people feel uncomfortable.

 

Hey, where’s the rush to review Charles Murray’s recent book “Facing Reality” about black crime and I.Q.? Nope, might make black people uncomfortable.

 

A few years ago, Kansas City officials were advised not to impose a curfew in response to the violent mobs of black teenagers descending on a shopping plaza because, as the black mayor said, it would “make a lot of black kids angry.” His remark inspired the title of Colin Flaherty’s book about black crime, “Don’t Make the Black Kids Angry”—a book that is currently banned from Amazon. It might make black people uncomfortable.

Anti-whiteness books are flooding the grade schools, but you aren’t allowed to spend your own money to purchase books on Amazon that make some people “uncomfortable.” Not only Flaherty’s book, but:

• Ryan Anderson’s When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment—might make transgenders uncomfortable.
• Jared Taylor’s If We Do Nothing, as well as two books he contributed to: Race Against Time and Face to Face With Race—might make black people uncomfortable.
• The Kindle edition of the widely praised 1973 dystopian novel by French author Jean Raspail, Camp of the Saints—might make third worlders uncomfortable.
• David Cole’s rollicking autobiography, Republican Party Animal—makes Debra Messing uncomfortable.

The FBI allowed the 9/11 attack to happen by blowing off an Arizona agent’s warning that a lot of Arabs were enrolled in flight school. Three thousand Americans had to die because noticing Arabs in flight school might make some people uncomfortable.

Last week, a Muslim terrorist, Malik Faisal Akram, seized a Texas synagogue and held four hostages for 10 hours.

 

The media universally identified Akram as: “British man.” He didn’t even call himself “British”! A week later, the Anti-Defamation League’s Jonathan Greenblatt went on MSNBC and tried to suggest “Republicans” were responsible for the attack. The truth might make Muslims uncomfortable.

 

A virus that originated in China cannot be called anything with “China” in the name. That might make Asians uncomfortable.

Before we go, here’s another “actual fact,” as Don Lemon put it, and “facts are uncomfortable” (especially for the black Harvard grad on MSNBC who can’t read a bill): By Harvard’s own admission, nearly 60% of the black students it admits are there only because they are black.

 

It’s so great that liberals have finally turned against snowflakes so we can discuss “actual facts” again! 

 

COPYRIGHT 2022 ANN COULTER

DISTRIBUTED BY ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION

Ann Coulter is the author of THIRTEEN New York Times bestsellers—collect them here.

 

 

WEST SIDE STORY OF HOLLYWOOD BIGOTRY

While critics rave about the remake of "West Side Story" by Spielberg, and the new, more "authentic" remake, I read that Spielberg decided NOT to use subtitles when the dialog is in Spanish. Spielberg asserted he did not want to "privilege" the English language.  He made the decision to deprive English speakers of the full film. OK, but I resent the discrimination against the majority of Americans who speak English as their only language OR who speak something other than Spanish as a 2nd language. English speakers, if you pay to see the film, you are encouraging further discrimination against you and yours. I POST THIS WITH A WARNING that such discrimination will only get worse.  I just posted my short comment on Newser: 

I read that Spielberg decided NOT to use subtitles when the dialog is in Spanish. He made the decision to deprive English speakers of the full film. OK, but I resent the discrimination against the majority of Americans who speak English as their only language OR who speak something other than Spanish as a 2nd language. English speakers, if you pay to see the film, you are encouraging further discrimination against you and yours.

     More thoughts on the subject.  I thoroughly enjoyed the original "West Side Story," and I enjoyed the dancing and accusatory Rita Moreno then, and am glad to know another person older than I am is still creative, for she is in the new film.  I saw her in "The Ritz," decades ago, and over the weekend, on a rerun of the 1950s tv sit-com, "Father Knows Best," she played an East Indian exchange student in the program's plea for tolerance.  I doubt if anyone from New Delhi objected to the actress (a word now out of fashion) playing someone from Asia then.  If you think my objection to the new film is petty, will the Spielberg film, when it plays Spain, Central and South America, run subtitles for the English parts of the film?  Or demand that the viewers learn English?  I assume it will have subtitles for the English parts of the film.  But Americans, no matter how many languages we know, are now to learn Spanish, as decreed by Hollywood.  I reject this politically correct demand, and will avoid the film.

EMMETT TILL STILL IN THE NEWS & THE NEW YORK TIMES

 The following is an excerpt from a NY Times article, as posted 7 Dec. 2021 on the site of American Renaissance.  Below the article is my comment on it - and on the case.   Hugh Murray

Justice Department Closes Emmett Till Investigation Without Charges

Audra D. S. Burch and Tariro Mzezewa, New York Times, December 6, 2021

 

The Justice Department announced on Monday that it had closed an investigation into the abduction and murder of Emmett Till, the African American teenager whose gruesome killing by two white men more than six decades ago in Mississippi helped begin the civil rights movement.

In a news release dated Dec. 6, federal officials said there was not enough evidence to pursue charges in the case, which was reopened after a historian claimed in a book that Carolyn Bryant Donham, the central witness whose account of an encounter with Emmett led to his death, had recanted the most salacious portions of her story — that he had grabbed her and made sexually suggestive remarks.

Citing the statute of limitations and Ms. Donham’s denial that she had ever changed her story, the Justice Department said it could not move forward with prosecuting her for perjury.

During a moment of the trial in which jurors were not present, Ms. Donham claimed that the teenager had made sexually vulgar comments toward her and physical contact. But in a book published in 2017, “The Blood of Emmett Till” by Timothy B. Tyson, the author wrote that Ms. Donham had recanted her testimony in a 2008 interview, saying that the earlier stories she told were “not true.”

{snip}

Mr. Tyson’s claim generated outrage and renewed calls for the case to be reopened. Kristen Clarke, who leads the Justice Department’s civil rights division, delivered the news to the family in person that the case was formally closed.

In a statement on Monday, the Justice Department said Mr. Tyson, despite saying he had recorded two interviews with Ms. Donham, provided just one recording to the F.B.I. that did not contain a recantation.

{snip}

Ms. Donham, 87, has rarely spoken publicly about the case. Her former husband and another man confessed to Emmett’s murder, though the confessions came after they were acquitted by an all-white jury. Both men are dead.

{snip}

In closing its investigation, the Justice Department said that Ms. Donham denied ever recanting her earlier testimony. In 2018, Ms. Donham’s daughter-in-law, Marsha Holley Bryant, who was present for the interviews with Mr. Tyson, said that Ms. Donham never recanted.

 

   MY COMMENT:

Mr Tyson says she recanted. Another woman, present at the interviews says Ms Donham did not. Tyson says he has 2 recordings of interviews with Ms Donham and gave one to the FBI. On that one, no recantation. Tyson never gave the other one to the FBI, if there was a 2nd one. Ms. Donham now says she did not recant. Tyson interviewed Ms. Donham some years ago, and said nothing about her changing her story AT THAT TIME until nearly a decade later when he published his book. At that time the media said Ms Donham was senile and could not confirm his story in his book. Hmmm! Is it possible the author of the book, Mr. Tyson, could have invented the story of her recantation in order to promote sales of his book? Is it possible Tyson lied? That he lied to smear a woman ,who when a young clerk in a store had to endure insulting and threatening advances by an obnoxious visitor from a distant city where such rude behaviour might have been tolerated or even the norm? But in Mississippi, as in most civilized lands, if you proposition a married woman, you are asking for trouble.

Comment of Pax Romana posted on Am Ren site 7 Dec 2021 but re the killing of another 14-year-old, edited

Black teenager, Emmett Till, (who sexually harassed a married woman in a store that was essentially her home, and was the son of an executed rapist and murderer), [I do not think the elder Till was charged with murder- Hugh Murray] who was himself murdered over 66 years ago, and who has been Memorialized, Sanctified, and Glorified by the MSM, Democrats, and in schools across the nation and around the world, right up to the present day, was also 14 years old at the time.

Here is a partial list of innocent White 14 year olds (the ones I know of), murdered by blacks, that the MSM, Democrats, and in schools across the nation and around the world, couldn't care less about:

14 year-old Ryan Rogers (stabbed to death while riding his bicycle, stabbed numerous times in the head and face were the cause of death) Palm Beach Gardens, FL., 11-15-2021

14 year-old Steven Wayne Butler III (beaten to death, body found in ditch)* Champaign, ILL., 7-29-2021

14 year-old Daisey ‘Jupiter’ Paulsen (stabbed more than 25 times, and strangled, while skateboarding) Fargo, N.D., 6-4-2021

14 year-old Cody Walker (shot to death, skeletal remains found in woods)* Milton, FL., 3-14-2021

14 year-old Ian Wilsey (shot to death in cold blood while walking to the store) Philadelphia, Pa. 11-28-2016

14 year-old David Kohler-Carpenter (shot to death, along with his 18 year old sister

14 year-old David Kohler-Carpenter (shot to death, along with his 18 year old sister and their father; home invasion) Barberton, OH., 12-31-2013

14 year-old Kelli O'Laughlin (stabbed to death during home burglary, perp taunted mother with dead daughter's cell phone) Indian Head Park, IL., 10-27-2011

14 year-old Lauren Deis (raped, stabbed to death, raped again after death, mutilation of her corps)* Pittsburgh, PA., 7-7-2010

14 year-old Chelsea Porter (raped, stabbed to death, during home burglery) Columbus, IND., 6-29-2007

14 year-old Chelsea Brooks (pregnant from rape, later strangled to death by rapist and accomplice)* Wichita, KS., 6-9-2006

14 year-old Ashley Nicole Neves (throat slite, face mutalated, hacked to death, for refusing perps advances)* Saint Marys, Camden County, GA., 5-21-2000

14 year-old Jennifer Ertman (kidnapped, gang raped, tortured, strangled to death, along with her 16 year old white girlfriend) Houston, TX., 6-24-1993

14 year-old Jody Lynn Wolf (raped, beaten to death, nude body found floating face up in Fresno canal) Fresno, CA., 8-13-1985

14 year-old Susan Jacobson (strangled to death, body in a 55-gallon oil barrel)* New York, N.Y., 5-15-1976

WAUKESHA - TERROR AT CHRISTMAS PARADE

 If a criminal with social media had attacked the views of BLM and denounced the George Floyd riots in many cities in 2020, if this man were a white supremist, and one late afternoon jumped into his car, ran through traffic barriers to get into the parade and then hit, rolled over, and killed 6 blacks and injured numerous others, there would be a storm in the major media about the white racist terrorist ,menace to America. But when a Black who supports BLM and the Floyd "protests" in many cities in 2020, gets into his car and ignores the traffic barriers to get into the Christmas parade in Waukesha, hitting, rolling over, and killing at least 6 now, and injuring numerous more, the media ignores the Black Nationalist ideology that may have inspired this terrorist attack. And Atty. Gen. Garland says not a word about a threat of Black Nationalist terrorists. Reality would ruin his support of Critical Race Theory in schools.

        The Establishment (elite, academedia complex, etc.) prefer to leave this as the case of a lone-nut criminal who had low bail.  They have no desire to inquire into his ideology, his anti-white and anti-Jewish racist posts on his social media.  The major media prefer to propagate the lie that only whites can be racists, only whites can be privileged.  I repeat, if a white had done this to a Black parade, if he would not have been lynched immediately by the onlookers, the media would be having sermons on white racism for a year on "news" programs and in schools.

      

    Hugh Murray