TRUMP APOLOGIZES RE: GREENLAND

 President Trump has apologized about his threats to take the island of Greenland, one way or the other.  He admitted, he made a mistake.  What he meant to say, he will take the emerald isle, one way or the other.  He will take Ireland, one way or the other.  As there are 2 greenland isles he confused one with the other.  He could simply say he would take both islands one way or the other, but many people might think then that he was a colonizing aggressor.  Don't want to give people such an absurd impression ot this man of peace.  Afterall, Trump has created a Board of Peace.  Or was it board with peace?

      Anyway Trump will send troops to Ireland and surround the home of Rosie O'Donnell and prevent her from making any more videos criticizing his Presidency.  But Trump reconsidered.  He thought Rosie's attacks on him were so weak, perhaps he should require that she appear on at least one news program daily with her confused denunciations of my Administration.  How pleasant to be President - except when they are literally shooting at you.

(To All, this is a joke.  You might have caught on with the first 2 words: Trump apologized.)  Hugh Murray

w

UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS? OR CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS?

    I can imagine someone skiing in Switzerland crossing a national border and not realizing that they were suddenly in France or Italy.  But those who enter the US from Mexico, especially those from further south, they know when they cross into the Us.  They may have paid a coyote, a smuggler of humans, to show them where to cross, where to head once across the border.  They know they are crossing the border, and they know they are doing it illegally.

     Crossing into the US is a crime.  So the new entry individual IS and illegal,  He is a criminal.

     In the late 1980s, I resided in NYC, and often listened to Public Radio's WNYC call-in program hosted by Lennie Lopate.  The topic was immigration, and I called to complain about illegal immigrants.  Lopate corrected me, that the station is no longer to use that phrase.  Hereafter, they will be known as undocumented immigrants.  I was not happy about the change, but told him I would refrain from using the illegal alien terms.  Then I added, so I will discuss the unwanted invaders!  I forget if he hung up on me or not.  All major media soon got in step with the latest liberal version of Newspeak.  Len and I had gone through a year of verbal battles as he defended Tawana Brawley, and I dared question her stories.  After a year of her allegations of a white officer assault on her, she dropped it, and things were settled.  Lopate and most liberals had supported her and her attorney, Al Sharpton, among others.  Today, Wikipedia describes it as a "rape hoax".

     Under Pres. Joe Biden, it seems the whole world was encouraged to come to the US.  I maintain Biden aided and abetted a foreign invasion of this country; certainly grounds for impeachment.  But the Dems, and some Republicans seem to be delighted as vast numbers entered our nation daily.  And under Biden, secret night plane trips to take the illegals to small communities round the nation.

     Trump's America First policies closed the southern border to most immigration.  And he wants to deport the criminals.  Trump speaks of the murderers and dope peddlers, BUT ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE CRIMINALS, by definition.  Some may be nice people just wanting a better chance - BUT THEY ARE CRIMINALS.  They too should be deported to make room for more jobs for Americans, and lower rents for Americans, and provide more time in schools for American children.  Deport the illegals, or have them self deport, and perhaps they may return, LEGALLLY, later.

    So all Americans who believe in America First should support ICE, support the national guards if called up, and generally support a mass deportation policy.  Also, with the removal of the illegals, it will be harder for Democrats to steal elections in future.  Unfortunately, Democrats tend to support the illegals aliens, just as Democrats tend to support criminals.

     Unfortunately, the Democratic Party has become the party of the criminals, by the criminals, and for the criminals.  Deport the illegals, and cripple the Democratic Party.

HUGH MURRAY

                                Add On the Subject

     Being old has its disadvantages, (I'm not going to present my list here), but some advantages also.  When I was young, I recall discussions of immigration, and those wishing to come as immigrants might have to have a sponsor to insure that if allowed into the US, the immigrant would not become a drain on the public.  Either the immigrant must show a certain amount of money to get in the US, or have a sponsor who will pay the immigrants debts if he fails to earn his way.

     I note this because in the discussions about immigrants in Minnesota, newscasters have noted that a large percentage of the immigrants are on welfare.  I forget if they said 30% or 50%, but it was a large pool of immigrants.  My question is how did this happen?  If on welfare, why are the not deported?

     If former Pres. Joe Biden is responsible, and if he was corrupt as some say, make him the sponsor of these welfare immigrants, and make Biden pay for all the welfare granted to these immigrants.  If the US began to raid Biden's accounts to pay for their welfare, I suspect he would quickly prefert that they be deported instead.

      

TRUMP, ICE, ARREST CHICAGO MAYOR AND ILLINOIS GOVERNOR???

Here is my comment on the subject from Newser -  Hugh Murray 

After 4 years of Open Border, invite the invaders, lawlessness of Biden and the Democrats, Pres. Trump wants to use ICE to enforce the law and rid the nation of unwanted invaders, some involved in criminal activities, some getting free education, some voting Democrat illegally. The pro-crime politicians try to obstruct law enforcement. They should pay the price. The number of murders in Berlin, Germany, a city of 3.2 million, 53. Number of murders in Democrat run Chicago, with 2.7 million, 570. Time to liberate Chicago from illegal aliens and general criminal activity accepted by the Democrat politicians.  Time for Trump to move in troops to restore America to Chicago.  In the tradition of Lincoln moving troops into the Democratic run states in rebellion in the 1860s; Trump is the Lincoln of today.
 0Press the down arrow key to see users who liked thisPress the down arrow key to see users who disliked this

THE INTELLIGENCE CROWD VS. AMERICA

   In July 1963 there was a training camp above Lake Pontchartrain, near New Orleans.  They were preparing for a new attack on Fidel's Cuba, training to overthrow the left-wing dictatorship and restore Havana as a city of fun, frolicking, tourism, and all that goes with it.  Some in the camp were recent refugees, called worms gusanos by Fidel.  The mafia would restore order, profits, and fun, and end the socialist experiment.  If all went well, Fidel and Che would be eliminated.

     The problem: Pres. John Kennedy had decided  he would try to work with Fidel to reduce tensions.  After the missile crisis, that could have brought nuclear war to Cuba, the US, and the USSR, Kennedy was looking at a way to have a more peaceful approach.  HE DID NOT WANT ANOTHER BAY OF PIGS IN 1963.  JFK was even going outside regular diplomatic channels to calm the waters between the US and Cuba.  He heard of the training camp, and wanted it closed.  GoogleAI notes it was not a CIA camp, just conservatives and refugees gathering explosives and other devices for an invasion of Cuba.  Possible.  But others allege it was a CIA project, even if not named so.  Were it a CIA project, JFK, President, could simply tell the CIA director to close it.  The director, likely out of step, could deny it's his, or ignore the order if it was his.  So to be sure it would be closed, JFK called on someone he could trust, his brother, Robert Kennedy Sr, then Attorney General.  and RFK dutifully sent the FBI to close down the camp.  Was it closing down a rogue camp?  Or was the FBI closing down a CIA camp?  How often does one agency of the US government close down another agency's project?

     Some thought it was a CIA camp, and were furious at its closure.  In meant, no invasion of Cuba, no overthrow of Fidel.  With this closure, one man said, Kennedy signed his death warrant.

    November 2, 1963, Diem is overthrown in a coup in Saigon.  American intelligence was involved in this.  Was JFK aware?  Did he approve?  Was it a rehearsal?

    November 22 another coup - in Dallas.

    In October 2020 in the midst of a Presidential election campaign, the NY Post springs revelations about a laptop of Hunter Biden, son of the Democratic nominee for President.  Sex and drugs (not too different from many young people with $$) but also on the computer revelations on how he got the $$ from Chinese "businessmen with links to their government, and his dad may have been involved too.  This was major news before an election, news that might cost the Democrats their hoped for victory..  Dem. operative at the time, Anthony Blinken, immediately wrote friends in Intel agencies.  The result - 51 leaders of American intelligence agencies, including the head of the CIA, signed on that they had seen the laptop and the story was wrong, it was based on Russian disinformation, AND THESE INTEL AGENTS PUT PRESSURE ON THE MAJOR INTERNET PROVIDERS TO BLOCK THE STORY.

     Officers of our government, like other citizens, have the right to vote for their choice for President and other officers.  THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO LIE ON BEHALF OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY usiing their status as American intelligence agents.  AND THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PREVENT THE STORY FROM APPEARING ON THE INTERNET USING THEIR OFFICES AS INTEL AGENTS TO PRESSURE OUTLETS SO THEY WILL DELETE THE BIDEN LAPTOP STORY.  Even if not a single ballot was stolen, by traditional election fraud methods, by making it so difficult to read the truth of possible Joe Biden's corruption with Chinese funds, the American Intel Community stole the election for  Biden and the Democrats.  They lied to defeat Trump and put Biden in the White House, and got google and other groups to black out the major story on Biden corruption as exposed on the laptop and in the New York Post.  Result - the lies of the CIA and other intel groups helped elect Biden and defeat Trump.  But this was not the first effort.

    In the campaign of 2016, Hillary Clinton vs Trump, the Clinton campaign put together a dossier trying to make Trump a dupe of the Russians.  The American Intel leaders knew it was fake, but used it anyway to try to discredit Trump.  Brennan, Clapper, and the FBI leader James Comey all went along with the Russiagate lie.  Result, a special counsel set up that put the first Trump Administration on the defensive for its first 2 years.  In the end, the Special Counsel found nothing, but the damage was done.

     Despite the hatred of the Intel community and the globalists, and the Fauci medictators, Trump won the election in 2024.  If he is to save America, he must clean out the FBI of the Comeys, and clean out the CIA and all other agencies of employees whose first loyalty is to the Dem. Party, or the UN, or general globalism.  We need employees who think of America First.  We have always welcomed those who want to come to the US legally, and we should continue that tradition.  We want to be led by our elected leaders, not by appointed bureaucrats.  We can get their advice, but our elected leaders must be our real leaders.  Other wise we are  essentially not that different from the Stalinist or other dictatorships.  Comey and his ilk should go to jail for using their appointed office to lie to the American people to help steal an election, and with Comey, all the other liars who distorted law enforcement to advance the Democrat Party. 

    I am not saying Trump or any of the Republicans are always right.  But for decades, the Intel community has sought to rule over us, and for some time, they have supported the Democrats.  Corny, but we have a great Constitution, and we should try to live with it and by it so that our democratic republic will continue to prosper in the future.

Hugh Murray 

A QUESTION ABOUT THE AMERICAN CIA BEING IN BED WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

You might begin with the previous post about the fake Russia Gate charges against Trump.  Though these charges were vehemently denied in the conservative media, the mainstream media often reported them as if they were true.

     However, one example illustrates both the unified efforts of the CIA-Democratic Party alliance to smash Donald Trump.  Just before the 2020 election, the New York Post broke the story of Hunter Biden's laptop, with photos of him with what seemed to be prostitutes in China, drug usage, and texts about the Bidens receiving millions of dollars from Chinese companies (related to the Chinese Communist Party?) -  It should also be noted, that a few years later, when Hunter Biden went to trial in connection to corruption revealed on his laptop, no one questioned the validity of his laptop in the court.  So much for the integrity of 51 of America's leading intelligence leaders..

     At the time Antony Blinken was foreign policy advisor to the Biden Presidential election campaign.  Blinken quickly reacted to the Post story - writing one of his friends in the CIA.  The election was in early November, and action had to taken immediately.  That friend, contacted others and in other intil agencies.  Soon 51 American intelligence agents, including the chief of the CIA, signed a letter pretending that they had examined Hunter's laptop, that it was a fraud, and the entire allegations were Russian disinformation.  With their influence, they were able to ban the Post story from the internet, while the major media news programs dismissed it as Russian   In disinformation,  In effect, they white washed the allegations against not only Hunter, but Joe Biden in the week before the election.  How many people might have voted for Trump if they had been allowed to read the Post story?

      Despite the much larger crowds at Trump rallies in 2020 while Biden campaigned from his home, or on one occasion before supporters inside their autos (probably fewer than 300) the media declared Biden the victor in the popular and in the Electoral vote.  Many Trump supporters simply did not believe the results.

      At a Trump rally in Washington, DC, on Jan. 5, 2021, many marched from there to the Capitol.  Some were intent on trying to change the electoral vote so Trump could resume the Presidency.  Others were being urged to take over the Capitol by individuals who may have been agents of the government, or hired by agents to do so.  There was some violence, some physical battles, but the only person shot was a Trump supporter, a woman, 5'2'' unarmed, shot dead by a DC policeman.

    VP Pence refused to go along with Trump's demands to challenge the count, and Biden was elected.  The Capitol Police and other agencies went all out to apprehend and convict all those who entered the Capitol.  The city, which usually votes about 95% Democrat. with anti-Trump judges and jurors, the Trumpers arrested generally got harsh sentences.

      Meanwhile Rep. Pelosi headed a Congressional Committee to investigate the "insurrection."  Unlike regular committees, she refused to allow the Republican leaders to choose the Republican members of the committee.  Instead, Democrat leader Pelosi would choose the Republican representatives.  When it cam to Trump, this was simply an anti-Trump committee; no defense allowed; no questioning of witnesses that might challenge the Democrat and (CIA) prosecution.  This was a kangaroo committee, a Stalinist type trial.

     According to Steve Bannon, Rachel Maddow announced on her tv program, if Trump would now retire, enjoy his fortune, all could be forgiven;  but if Trump were to re-enter the Presidential race, for 2024, they would go after him.  Trump chose not to retire.  According to Bannon, Atty. Gen. Garland began to work with various attorneys in various states, to make sure Trump could not run again - put him in prison for as long as possible; go after him on charges that no one else would be charged with; who cares about the details.  Go after his friends, impoverish Rudy Giuliani, Mayor of NYC during the terror attack on the former World Trade Center, bankrupt his allies, put Bannon in jail, and his economic advisor, Peter Navarro, get banks to refuse to work with conservative organizations.  The Democrats seemed to have one victory after another.  Finally, they could announce, Donald Trump, Convicted Felon!  That could keep him off the ballot in some states and weaken him everwhere.  But in the police photo, Trump is defiant.  Moreover, I noted that Martin Luther King was a convicted felon, as was I, as were many in the civil right movement who had violated Democratic Party unjust laws.

     And other courts began to question these political trials.  In the end, the people would decide in the 2024 election.  The CIA/Democratic Party lost to Trump.

     My speculation: If the CIA, which is rather good at overthrowing other governments, and maybe even distorting election results in other lands, did they also make sure Trump lost in 2020?  Could our agency get into the voting machines?  distort numbers?  give Biden votes?  I have no proof, but I would not put it past them.  I suspect they gave us the disastrous Presidency of Joe Biden.  Not since the government involvement in the 2 coups of November 1963 - November 2 in Saigon, November 22 in Dallas - and the counter-coup that removed Nixon a decade later, has there been such disregard of democracy, the popular views; instead we were given a bitter taste of Stalinist legal practices, etc.   My view, we came too close to a total dictatorship of the Intelligence Agencies and their Democratic plundering allies during the destructive Biden Presidency.

     Trump has to rebuild the nation while fighting an entrenched group who could proudly defy the law and the popular will to aid and abet a foreign invasion of millions during Biden's sad attempt to break America.  The damage that man caused is all round us.

      I will not agree with everything that Trump will have to do to rebuild and heal America.  But, at least, the bleeding has stopped, and we are generally headed in the right direction.                         HUGH MURRAY

FROM RT - HOW THE CIA HELPED THE DEMS TO DEFEAT TRUMP - THE STORY AVOIDED BY NBCBSABC, etc

 

Russiagate was a ploy to ‘screw Trump’ – CIA boss

The Obama administration’s top spies manipulated the probe from the onset, according to John Ratcliffe

FILE PHOTO: CIA director John Ratcliffe. ©  Global Look Press / CNP / Chris Kleponis

A US intelligence report on Russia’s alleged interference in the 2016 presidential election, commissioned by then-President Barack Obama, was nothing but a deliberate manipulation, CIA Director John Ratcliffe has said, citing his agency’s recent internal review.

Known as the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian Election Interference (ICA), the report kickstarted the Russiagate conspiracy, prompted special counsel Robert Mueller’s inquiry, and “ate up the first two years” of President Donald Trump’s first term, Ratcliffe said in an interview with the New York Post published on Wednesday. The new CIA head ordered an internal review of the report in May.

Obama ordered the ICA just six weeks before leaving office. According to the CIA review of its drafting and rushed release, declassified on Wednesday, then-CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper were unusually and “excessively involved” in the process.

“The rushed timeline to publish both classified and unclassified versions before the presidential transition raised questions about a potential political motive behind the White House tasking and timeline,” the review said, calling the work on the report “chaotic,” “atypical,” and “markedly unconventional.”

The CIA review found that Brennan effectively directed the compilation of the ICA and particularly insisted on including the later discredited Steele dossier. The dossier – a compilation of unverified rumors about Trump and his alleged links to Russia – was compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and reportedly funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

READ MORE: Trump declassifies FBI files on Russia probe

“This was Obama, Comey, Clapper, and Brennan deciding, ‘We’re going to screw Trump,’” Ratcliffe said, commenting on his agency’s findings. “It was, ‘We’re going to create this and put the imprimatur of an IC assessment in a way that nobody can question it.’ They stamped it as Russian collusion and then classified it so nobody could see it.”

“Brennan and Clapper and Comey manipulated [and] silenced all the career professionals and railroaded the process,” the CIA director added.

American public opinion was further manipulated by constant media leaks and unnamed officials cited by The Washington Post, The New York Times, and other mainstream outlets.

“Before work on the assessment even began, media leaks suggesting that the IC had already reached definitive conclusions risked creating an anchoring bias,” the review noted.

READ MORE: Hollywood l Oliver Stone blasts ‘Russiagate lies’

The ICA, as well as the FBI’s 2016 ‘Crossfire Hurricane’ investigation and the subsequent Mueller inquiry, cast a long shadow over Trump’s first term, with allegations of “Russian collusion” persisting in the media even after Mueller’s report found no evidence to support them. Moscow has also repeatedly denied any election interference.

You can share this story on social media:

CIA v. USA?

    The recent attack by Ukraine deep into Russia raises many questions.  First, it was amazingly successful.  About a third of Russia's strategic bombers were attacked on the ground, safe Russian ground, remote from any borders.  Drones were the culprits, we are told.  Ukraine takes the credit.

   War inspires invention.  The American Civil War produced an early submarine that damaged a larger ship.  The Gatling gun, an early version of the machine gun, gave a preview of what later versions would do in WWI to provide great advantage to the defenders, resulting in the widespread use of trench war fare, and huge losses of men to capture small areas of territory.  The use of hot-air baloons to lift observers to better see the surrounding terrain was used in varous 19th century conflicts, but was now being replaced by airplanes, which began to add guns so they could do more than observe.  Poison gas killed on both sides.  Zeppelins bombed enemy cities.

   The tanks moved ahead despite the machine guns, and the static war of trenches was replaced by the lightning (fast) war of tanks in WWII.  Planes could shoot more and bomb more, radar helped, and bombs grew in size.  U-Boots  could hide under water longer. The Russians developed a heavier, beter armored tank with heavier fire-power, the Germans lost the Battle of Kursk, and the war in Europe.  The A-Bomb swept rhe Japanese Asian Empire into a vast nuclear cloud of death.  The war in Ukraine saw tanks of both sides stopped by drones.  What else could they do?  Recent tanks, recent fighter jets, disabled by cheap drones!  Apartment houses defaced and usually a few tenants killed by drones.

   Both Russia and Ukraine sent their drones into the territories of their opponents,  Then the REAL SURPRISE attack by Ukraine destroying rail bridges and Russia's strategic bombers.  Could Ukraine have done this alond.  Steve Bannon asserts that American intelligence services must have been involved to provide information on Russian bomber whereabouts.  American intelligence services and devices would have been required.  In taking out so many of Russia's strategic bombers, in one swoop, this, argues Bannon, was an act of war; and our intelligence was deeply involved.

   Did Trump know about this planned sneak attack?  Was he informed?  Did he approve?  Trump had been calling for the end of the war; he ran for President speaking of ending the war quickly.  The American intelligence agencies are usually globalists, anti-MAGA, pro-Democrats, as exposed by 51 leaders of the US intelligence community signing an over lie just prior to the 2020 Presidential election; they said that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.  This was meant to let Hunter, AND JOE BIDEN off the hook of sizable corruption with China, implications.  The agencies urged Google and other big tech corporations to discount the laptop story, thereby helping Biden defeat Trump.

   Was the Ukrainian drone raid simply meant to show that the Ukraine was still capable of fighting?  Or an attempt to sabotage Trump's peace efforts?  It is possible Trump had become with Putin's delays of negotiation and therefore Trump gave his approval of the drone killing the bomber plans.  OR Trump may have been ignored or even defied; if they went ahead without his green light.

   Who runs America?  We elect Presidents and Congress; but who makes the final decisions?  It is not a new problem.  The agencies had their say in 1963 in Dallas.  Trump has had to survive a Butler, PA, assassin, and another in Florida with Ukrainian connections.

   One hopes Trump will bring Peace to Ukraine and other areas, and peace and prosperity to America.  One hopes the agencies will not stage another coup.

   Trump is an admirer of Israel's Iron Dome that protects the small nation from missiles from Iran, Yemen, and other hostile nations and territories.  Trump wants a Golden Dome to protect from Greenland to Alaska, Canada and the USA, a vast defensive dome to prevent missiles coming in to destroy our defences and cities.  Question - with drones a new and effective method of war, can drones simply slip in below the Dome and do all the damage they want???  Are Domes practical defences any more?  In the new age of the drone, can America rely on a Dome??  Hugh Murray

2 VIEWS OF TRUMP

 Hugh:  I sure wish I had voted for Donald in the election, then I could tell myself what a sh*t faced, anus faced, cock-s**k sh*thole I was to have voted for the orange blob, for believing all his sh*t.  Instead, I voted for that stupid woman, so I cannot tell myself those things.  Clark

Subject: Re: Can I change my vote?

Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:12:45 GMT

Clark, we are entering new territory with Trump.  Much, I suspect is bluster, but...The border is basically closed to the masses entering under Biden, Dems, and lib Republicans.  Salvador seems to have ideal prisons for nations over run by criminals.  Seems most of their regular folks are happy with the prisons.  We should send more and more invaders there, and include a few judges too.  We should get to learn more about Lee Harvey this year;  I hope so   I don't think much new will be divulged on RFK.  Sirhan said he did it for his county.  Many bewildered.  He was Christian, Palestinian, emphasis on the latter. Unfortunately, not the last of Palestinian terrorists in the USA.   MLK surely had powerful enemies, but also poor crazy ones too.  

I suspect the tariff jumps are simply a bargaining tool, but his aim is to bring back industrial production to the US.  Am delighted to see possible end of anti-white, and anti-male discrimination (DEI).  It has taken longer, but I do hope Trump can end the Ukrainian war.  Ike did not end the fighting in Korea in a day either.  Struggle against pro-crime DAs and judges will go on.  If you cannot buy a beer till age 21, you should not be able to change you sex until then either.

    During the Cold War, we had many hidden bases in Greenland, but cold problems, expense, and we abandoned most of what we had.  We'll see what Trump can get.  We built the Panama Canal, and should have priority rights.  Gaza, prime land, but a hornets nest.

   For much of his new term, it is too early to tell.  A new direction, some experiments, but results are not yet in.  Surely better than more of the Dems, open borders to millions, spending ever more trillions, esp on welfare and corruption all over the globe, and cozy connexions with CCP.  Yes, I believe Hunter AND Joe were getting Chinese money, as they are corrupt.

    Our main opponent is China. Trump will try to get Putin away from his Chinese alliance, save Taiwan, and if we play our cards right, we'll have VN, Philippines, and other SE Asian lands at our side.  We allowed China to turn the S China Sea into their sea.  China has built the world's largest army, navy, hypersonic weapons, ...Trump has a task.  A very difficult one.  There will be some mistakes with the huge tasks left in his lap by the anti American Democratic Party.  I am proud to have voted for Trump for his 3rd run for President.  I hope he will be a great one.  Nasty bathroom barbs do not change the reality.  Most Americans hope Trump can and should change our reality for the better.     Hugh Murray

LEFT-WING JUDGES VS. POPULIST POLITICIANS -- PRISON FOR DISSENT

 The left-globalists show their true totalitarian colors. They send Marine Le Pen to jail and declare she cannot run for French Pres., even tho she is now heading the pack!. In Germany, the CDU-SPD coalition ponders banning the populist Alternative for Germany party, which is now the #2 party. In Moldova and Rumania there are disputes, but the judges are preventing the populists from running and taking power. Ukraine's Zelensky simply cancelled presidential elections a year or 2 ago, and remained in office unelected. In Brazil, the left-wing Lula,di Silva installed as Pres. with the help of Biden's CIA, is prosecuting Bolsonaro so he cannot run in the next election. He had been Pres. of Brazil and then lost in a disputed election (like the US 2020). Brazil's judges want to imprison him so he cannot run in the next election. Of course, in the US, Biden used the fed jand state udges to make Trump a convicted felon,so no one would vote for him and Trump was facing up to 700 years in prison. Happily, the American people delivered their own saner judgment in Nov. 2024. Instead of rounding up populist leaders, maybe it's time ro round up left-wing judges, and send them for re-education courses in El Salvador's fine new prisons.----------------Hugh Murray

 0

Reply

THE LEAK AND THE LATEST ATTEMPT TO CRIPPLE THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

 Here we go again. Recall the 51 intel agents who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop just before the 2020 election, calling it Russian dis-info; their aim to discredit the expose of the corruption of the Biden family, and therby help the Democrats defeat Trump.. The US Deep State hates Trump. When he won the election of 2016, FBI agents quickly interviewed Gen Flynn, tricking him, and knocking him out before he could take a post in the Trump Adm. and clean out some of the Deep State (above the laws) crowd. Now the leak to the Atlantic Monthly writer. A year ago that magazine ran a story on how America needs a Brutus to take care of Trump - calling for the assassination of Trump. The author of that story is the husband of Victoria Nuland, the State Dept. figure who was most involved in the overthrow of the duly elected Ukraine govt. a decade ago. She was most responsible aiso in push to get to the bio labs, that the US Defense Dept had established in Ukraine, to get to those bio labs before the Russians did. What was going on in the US DoD bio labs in Ukraine that was so vital???

Sec. of Defense Hegseth used to have a television program on Fox News.  If he had a Fox phone number on his phone that somehow got added to this conference call, one could easily understand it.  But instead, the conference call added the number, of all the numbers in the world, addedd the number of a Trump hating writer at the Atlantic Monthly magazine.  What are the odds of this happening?  I think it more likely that this "leak: was a purposely instigated operation of the Deep State, probably by recent members of the intelligence agencies, highly probable among those recently fired.  Meanwhile Patel and Gabbard have to look foolish trying to explain this and they are not at their real jobs getting their officesinto gear with the new Administration.

Considering the history of our intel agencies and the Deep State in controlling our govt., I strongly suspect the Deep State is behind the leak to the Atlantic Monthly, and how it is being used to discredit Trump and cripple his Cabinet.
Elements of our govt. were probably involved in the assassination and cover up of the murder in Dallas, in overthrowing Nixon, and crippling Trump's first term with the fake Russian collusion allegations, and they are at it again. Do we the people run America? Or are our real leaders an elite of various intel agents and their sponsors?------------Hugh Murray

Note how many of the most Trumpian Cabinet members are now facing hostile questioning by the Democrats in Congress.  This is the beginning of an attempted coup.  If that fails, they hope to cripple the Administration.  If that fails, they may call on one of their many Brutuses.

 0

Reply

MITCH LANDRIEU, FORMER MAYOR OF NEW ORLEANS, CALLS TRUMP A TRAITOR TO THIS COUNTRY

 Mitch Landrieu, a former Mayor of New Orleans, called President Trump a "traitor" to this country.  He made the accusation of MSNBC, and was quoted on Breitbart.  Here is my basic comment on Breitbart:

Interesting that the former mayor of New Orleans is speaking of Trump and Democracy. If I recall correctly, the last time NO had a Republican mayor was around 1873, soon after the war.  It is possible that Michael Hahn, an editor of a German language newspaper in NO, was appointed mayor, but did  not serve because of the changing military basically in charge.  When there was a large meeting in NO to press for voting rights for blacks, and a few whites like Hahn attended, the Democrats, using their notions of "democracy' raided the area killing many.  The 1866 "riots" in New Orleans and Memphis killing many. 

 The 1866 "riots" in New Orleans and Memphis, angered the North and helped the radical Republicans win the Congressional elections that year.  In 1870 Benjamin Flanders, a native of New England, was appointed mayor of NO in 1870, and then elected to the post, serving until 1873.That was the last Republican mayor of NO.  Thereafter, NO became part of the one-party, Democrat, white-supremacist, segregationist, "solid South."  It was Democrat, but not democratic.

.

Some will say, I am being unfair to the Democrats.  The Democratic Party has changed since the days of segregation and the "solid South."  True, the Democratic Party has changed.  It is no longer the party of white racism.  But till this day, the Democrats of today, like the Democrats of old, reject the notion that all citizens should be treated equally!  The Democrats reject the notion of hiring and promoting the best qualified for the job; instead, they want most jobs to "look like America," so if there are not 50% women scientists, that is proof of discrimination against women, a given % of Hispanics, % of blacks, % of gays, of...To achieve this end, hiring by quota becomes more important than hiring by competence.  Standards decline, and bureaucrats do their best to cover this up by changing the usual standards, lying.  From elementary schools up through medical schools, those who are failing are given passing grades if they are of certain races, ethnicities, genders. for to fail  one of the special class of students might bring problems for that teacher or professor.  It is scamming the system, paper credentials that suddenly mean little about the holder's comprehension and skills, and more about their race, ethnicity, and gender.  And the last qualities will get them to higher positions through diversity, equity, and inclusion, the new euphemism for the new racism, and sexism, so dominant in the new Democratic Party.  It was the party of white racism; now it is the party of anti-white racism, and other isms.  In that sense, the Democrats have not changed; they reject Civil Rights as equal rights for all citizens.

Trump is hated today because he is like Gen. Eisenhower, who vowed to go to Korea to end the no-win, never-ending Korean "police action." Officially, Ike failed, as the Koreas are today legally still at war. But the daily hot war was ended by Ike in the 1950s. And if given a chance, Trump will end the Ukrainian war. Trump is not an appeaser; he wants to end one of the many Democrat no-win, never ending wars. Furthermore, Ike started Operation Wetback, to round up invaders (illegal aliens) and sent them back to Mexico.  And Ike was the first President since Reconstruction to send troops to the South to defend the rights of blacks, at Central High in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Ike generally brought America peace and prosperity; Trump is trying to do the same. And save democracy in the process.

THE ZELENSKY-TRUMP MEETING IN THE WHITE HOUSE, FEB 2024 -- 2 ANALOGIES

     This morning on America's usual left-wing National Public Radio, they had an interview with a foreign policy expert, a Republican, to analyze the Trump-Zelensky White House shouting match.  Normally, PBS invites liberal Democrats and quizzes them with soft-ball questions so they can present their views at length.  When interviewing a populist Republican, the questions are hostile, and when the guest tries to answer, the NPR reporter interrupts often so you may never hear the full reply.

     This morning, the NPR guest was a Republican, for mer American Ambassador to the UN, and an official during the first Trump administration, John Bolton.  Bolton thought the White House spat was a disaster.  He thought Zelensky was trying to defend his country, while Trump is on a mission to sell it our.  Trump is simply repeating Putin propaganda.  In effect, what Trump is planning is a new 1938 Munich conference, in which Chamberlain allowed Hitler to carve up Czechoslovakia in a way so it could no longer be defended from the growing German military under Hitler.  Trump is planning a sell out of Ukraine in the same way.  The West did not stand by Czechoslovakia, the democratic state, so Hitler swallowed it in pieces.  Chamberlain's Peace in Our Time led directly to WWII.  Bolton, a Republican, is a known war-hawk, and some have quipped , there has never been a war he disapproved.  Like Lynn Cheney and the J-6 Committee, Bolton is no fried of  Trump?

     But is Trump the new Chamberlain?  Is Trump a modern appeaser of a dictator, betraying a democratic ally?  Is his Peace in Our Time another mirage?  Should Trump be waving an umbrella?  Is he a Putin puppet?

    A BETTER ANALOGY.  In 1950 Kim Il Sung, leader of the New North Korean Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, got permission from Soviet leader Josef Stalin to invade South Korea.  So began the Korean War.  Or was it a war?  Soldiers and civilians died.  In America, pressure mounted on Dem. Pres. Harry Truman.  South Korea, surprised by the attack, was losing.  Would the war be lost before America could decide? To intervene or not?  Truman decided to intervene, but not alone.  He asked the UN to do so too.  The only way the resolution passed was because the USSR was boycotting because the UN Security Council because the seat for China was still occupied by he Republic of China (Nationalist) and not the new Peoples Republic of China (Mao's Communists who had control of the mainland and proclaimed the PRC from a Beijing balcony in 1949.)  Gen. Douglas Mac Arthur would lead the American effort and any smaller efforts by our allies.)

     In South Korea, only a small south-east corner round Pusan was still free from the invaders.  Mac Arthur ordered naval invasions around Inchon, near the middle of the peninsular cutting supply lines to the North, and the Communists began their retreat.  Some Brits, Filipinos, and other American allies joined the fray, and the anti-communists now invaded the North.  Suddenly the North was crumpling. retreating toward the Yalu River, the border, mainly with China, and a little bit with the USSR.

     If the Communists were surprised by the naval invasion of the center of the 2 nations at Inchon by Mac Arthur's counter attack, now Mac Arthur was caught off-guard.  Mao had called for a mass of Chinese volunteers to help the comrades in Korea against the capitalist imperialists.  Vast numbers of Chinese were suddenly crossing the Yalu, pushing back the Americans, in extremely cold winter conditions.  America had almost won, and victory was now being snatched from them by the masses of Asia and the bitter cold.  Mac Arthur had a plan to steal back the victory form the Chinese "volunteers" - he would up the ante of the war by using a nuclear bomb.  Truman had played the international card; this was not an official war; it was a police action, with the UN.  Truman decided, no nukes, and no more Mac Arthur.  He fired the general.  The war dragged on with more and more casualties.  Korea was the first of America's No Win Wars.  The fighting, and casualties continued.

     For the Presidential election of 1952, Truman's polling was dismal, about 25%.  He chose not to run again, but Adlai Stevenson, who sounded like a liberal elitist became the Democratic candidate.  Gen. Eisenhower led the Republicans with Richard Nixon as his VP candidate.  In the campaign, Ike announced he would go to Korea to END THE WAR.

     Officially, Ike failed.  Officially, North and South Korea are STILL at war.  But, with difficulties, which POWs should be returned, etc., still, the fighting generally came to an end.  Without Ike's promise, the fighting war might still be going on in Korea, with killing Koreans AND Americans.  Was Ike a weakling for pushing peace?  Was Ike like Chamberlain encouraging Hitler?  Or was Ike a very wise man?  Ike was not perfect, no one is.  But he was wise in ending a no-win war (police action).  Trump is not like Chamberlain bringing on WWIII; Trump is like Ike.  Bolton is wrong.  So are the European leaders: Macron, Starmer, King Charles, et al.  By contrast, Trump is a wise leader, trying to find a way to peace and prosperity for most.

     ANOTHER QUESTION - How many foreign prime ministers and presidents actively campaign in American Presidential elections?  In the campaign of 2024, Zelensky actively campaigned for Kamala Harris and the Democrats, against Republican Trump.  Was this not an example of foreign influence on the campaign?  Trying to sway America to keep up the flow of dollars and arms?  Was this not also an example of "foreign collusion" in our affairs?  When Zelensky arrived at the White House in February 2025, Pres. Trump should have met him at the door, "If you are here to request help, I suggest you go instead to the offices of Kamala Harris.  You campaigned for my defeat.  Ask her for help instead." 

     Bottom line - Trump is for peace, but he is not an appeaser.  He follows the tradition of Pres. Eisenhower, who did not want never ending, no-win wars that were detrimental to our nation, (but profitable for some in the military-industrial complex.  Ike had courage to use Operation Wetback to round up illegal aliens, and send them back to Mexico.

    Is Trump a puppet of Moscow?  It was Bill Clinton who received $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.  It was the Biden family that received special deals, getting millions of dollars from Chinese firms, and even getting Hunter on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian energy firm.  And the American corrupt deep state *remember the 51 American intelligence agent leaders, who without seeing the Hunter laptop, but at the behest of then Democratic Party operative Anthony Blinken, LIED to the American public signing their names that the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation.  Doing this just before the 2020 election to help corrupt Biden and help defeat Trump.  But when Hunter finally went to trial, no one challenged ther validity of Hunter's laptop.  It shows that the head of CIA, and other agencies were Deep State, liars, not to defend America, but to defend their private intersts and harm their personal foes.  One more reason for Trump to have a clean sweep of the swolen government.

     In the end, all we are saying - is give Trump a chance!          

HUGH MURRAY