ELLIOT RODGERS: MURDERER, WAR ON WOMEN, GUN CONTROL, WHITE PRIVILEGE

     In Southern California, many know now that Elliot Rodgers, a 22-year-old student, went on a killing spree.  What is amazing is some of the reactions to this event.  Salon, the lefty web site, published an article blaming the killing on white male privilege, and the Washington Post ran a somewhat similar article.
     Elliot Rodgers was a handsome young man; his father was English, and his mother Chinese.  Why does a man only half white become white?  Because most deem him evil!  Why does the half Hispanic George Zimmerman become white?  Because the Left considers him evil!  Why does the half white Barack Hussein Obama remain Black?  Because the Left (which dislikes whites), considers Obama good.  So he is Black.
     The father of Rodgers and others immediately strike up the agitation for gun control.  His murder spree is the fault of lack of gun control.  Yet, Rodger's first 3 victims were not shot - they were killed with knives and a hammer.  And he tried to kill others with his BMW.  Should we ban knives?  Ban hammers?  Ban automobiles?  Did the hammer cause the murder?  Neither did the guns.
     The feminists are shown on television complaining about the war on women and this is one more example.  Rodgers did hate women who rejected him.  He planned to murder many.  His manifesto elaborates how women have been cruel to him, rejecting him, and he will not get his revenge.
     But the first 3 victims of Rodgers were men.  Two were his roommates, and one a visitor.  All 3 of them were Asian.  In planning his murder spree, Rodgers admitted if he liked the roommates, it might be more difficult.  But they were ugly.  They had terrible voices.  They were the worst of nerds.  He would enjoy killing them.  He did kill them.  But nowhere in the media does one hear about a war on nerds.  Or a war on the uglies (and not everyone would consider his roommates ugly).  Or a war on Asians.  Rodgers then killed another male and later, himself.  So of the 7 dead, 5 were men, 2 were women.  However, only the feminists get to push their agenda that all men are rapists, or planning to rape, or other criminal types.  The media provides the feminists the forums to propagate their anti-male messages.
     There is little doubt that Elliot Rodgers enjoyed economic privilege.  I watched one of his videos on Youtube.  He had his BMW, why he had even bought a pair of Armani sunglasses for $300.  How is it, he asks incredulously, that no woman will fall for him?  He asserts that he is "fabulous"  He is oblivious to how obnoxious he is in that video.  He is young and handsome, but his parents undoubtedly gave him the money for the sunglasses and car.  Worse, he showed no interest in most women.  He wanted a trophy lady, preferably blond, blue-eyed, and perfect figure.  He probably viewed most women like he viewed his roommates, ugly with terrible voices.  And it seems most of the beautiful blonds were unimpressed with the arrogant bastard even if he had $300 Armani sunglasses.
     The problem in America is not guns.  The problem is trying to find the right balance so that crazy people can be committed to mental institutions.  "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" implied that people inside the crazy houses were just as sane as those on the outside.  And America began to close its mental institutions.  Most crazies were set free.  And it became almost impossible to commit a lunatic.  Parents were helpless trying to have children committed; so were other relatives.  The result was that crazies were often on the streets, reducing the quality of life for everyone else, until they were arrested and placed in jail.  They did not belong in jail.  They belong in mental institutions.
     Elliot Rodgers should have been committed to a mental institution.  He became a crazy killer.  He used guns, knives, and a car to kill.  Guns are not the problem.  America does not know how to handle the mentally ill.
    Of course, some may be on the US Supreme Court.  The high court is so determined to prevent justice to murderers, so determined to prevent the death penalty (which murderers justly deserve), that now the court ruled a murderer need not be too crazy or too mentally deficient to avoid the death penalty.  The Supreme Court is clearly wrong again.  If a crazy or an idiot murders, all the more reason to execute them.  They are even less likely to learn the evil of their deed that a mentally stable murderer.
           Hugh Murray

EXECUTIVE ORDERS - OBAMA'S ON GUNS, FDR'S ON SALARIES

By Hugh Murray

     There is now speculation that Pres. Obama will issue an Executive Order to restrict gun sales and thereby avoid amending the American Constitution, and avoid Congressional opposition.
     One should stress that not all radical Executive Orders fulfill their purpose.  For example, in 1942 another extremely radical American President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued an Executive Order.  Below is how wikipedia describes it:   
    "He [FDR] also issued Executive Order 9250 in October 1942, later to be rescinded by Congress, which raised the marginal tax rate for salaries exceeding $25,000 (after tax) to 100%, thereby limiting salaries to $25,000...^{"
     So in FDR's America, no one was to earn more than $25,000!  Or if you earned more than that, there would be a tax of 100% on earnings above 25k.  Not only did FDR's government have Communist spies at the time, but he was pushing far-left policies for America.  Happily, Congress prevented the implementation of FDR's confiscatory Executive Order, and today many Americans are happy to earn more than $25,000 a year.
     One hopes that Congress will prevent any implementation of Obama's attempt to defy the Constitution and implement gun control through Executive Order.  If FDR's socialist program of a salary cap could be defeated during WWII, Obama's socialist program on guns can be defeated today.
     Would you favor reintroduction of FDR's Executive Order limiting salaries to $25,000?}

Recent Comments: Olympic Political Expulsions, Racist Mobs, Gun Control

German rower leaves London after reported ties to neo-Nazis surface

By Maggie Hendricks | Fourth-Place Medal – 4 hours ago

My comment

Hugh Murray  •  Delafield, Wisconsin  •  5 minutes ago Remove

Why are there political qualifications for the Olympics? Today they go after the neo-Nazis; tomorrow they go after the Communists; and then the Libertarians. The Olympic officials seem happy to expel "racists."  But many in the world judge Zionism as racism.  Should the Israeli athletes be expelled too?  In 2008 the Beijing authorities condemned the protests against the Olympics maintaining the games were not political - they were for the athletes.  If diversity is so important, in addition to numerous nations, races, religions, why not have a diversity of political views?  Judge the athletes by their performances.  If they cheat - expel them.  A good athlete may me good in other ways; or perhaps not.  They may, or may not, be role models in other areas of life.  But in an athletic event, judge them by their athletic ability.
Perhaps, it's time to expel some of the Olympic officials who demand expulsions for political reasons.  These officials are enemies of freedom.

Hate Crime Hoaxes Present Burdens, Lessons for College Campuses

Allie Grasgreen, Inside Higher Ed, July 31, 2012

My comment

There is racism on campus, institutionalized racism.  It is called affirmative action.  It is a hate crime in denying equal opportunity to better qualified white students.   This is the hate crime committed by the universities with the approval, nay the demand of the federal government.  Perhaps one day we can investigate these crimes, and punish the perpetrators.-----Hugh  Murray

In Obama era, have race relations improved?

By JESSE WASHINGTON | Associated Press – Mon, Jul 30, 2012

My comment

Hugh Murray  •  Delafield, Wisconsin  •  5 days ago Remove

Black racist flash mobs occur in large cities and small, attacking whites, Asians, Hispanics. The liberals are in denial, hiding the racist nature of these mobs, calling them "youths." Obama stood on the platform with New Black Panther Party leaders - some of whom advocate the killing of all white people. Obama's Attorney General Holder has imposed anti-white, Black racist policies to keep Black bullies in schools where they are suspended,.  Also Holder obstructs attempts to prevent voter fraud with picture IDs, and to challenge absentee voter fraud in various counties in Mississippi and Alabama (where Black sheriffs destroy democracy). And the liberal media hide Black racist crime and emphasizes the attempt to prevent it, as with the neighborhood watch program and the George Zimmerman case in Florida. Black on white crime is ignored, or excused, or encouraged by the academia complex. No wonder most academic and media folk support Obama and the Democrats!

Flash Mob Robbers Steal $3,000 from Chicago Store. What Happened to Happy Dancing?

By Lylah M. Alphonse, Senior Editor, Yahoo! Shine | Work + Money – Mon, Jul 30, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

My comment

Hugh Murray  •  Delafield, Wisconsin  •  3 days ago Remove

"Teens" flash mob. "Youths" mob. When will the media tell the truth - Black racist mobs on rampage. Sometimes merely stealing; sometimes fighting; sometimes beating whites, or Asians, or Hispanics. Racist mobs! Sometimes they play a game, knocking out an innocent victim, but sometimes killing them. The media excuse the murderers - oh, the poor teens. The media cover up the Black racist criminals. Often mayors and police chiefs do the same.
Happily there is a new book out, White Girl Bleed a Lot, that may help expose the horrors covered up by the media and the Democrats.

Chinese teen kills nine in knife attack: reports

AFP – Thu, Aug 2, 2012

My comment:

Hugh Murray  •  Delafield, Wisconsin  •  1 day 0 hrs ago Remove

Clearly, China needs knife control. Ban all knives to prevent such disasters. Only the military should be allowed such dangerous weapons.