RT - ON DR. FAUCI'S LIES NOW EXPOSED , BUT HIS WORSE CRIME WAS NOT LYING TO CONGRESS, BUT CAUSING COUNTLESS DEATHS

If you go to the right of the articles, there is an index of past posts on this blog.  I was furious with Dr. Fauci during the explosion of the Covid virus, NOT BECAUSE HE MIGHT LIE TO CONGRESS, BUT BECAUSE HIS POLICIES WERE KILLING PEOPLE.

A short summary, Dr. Fauci was using our tax dollars to fund research to make bat and bird viruses more contageous to humans AND more deadly.  Back then, Fauci pretended the new covid virus came from someone eating bat soup in Wuhan.  Now they say, it accidently escaped from the Wuhan lab.  OR might it have been purposely spread among the populations?

When the virus began to spread in the US, Dr. H on Fox TV found his father had it.  Dr. H got him some hydroxychloroquine, and his dad was fine in a few days.  Various doctors and nurses were doing the sme with positive results.  Dr. Fauci quickly stepped in to prevent such a cheap solution.  He demanded no more use of that drug, and doctors might lose their licenses if they defined Fauci's edict.  Then he demanded the same of pharmacists, with the same threat of loss of license.  No cheap remedies were to proscribed until a vaccine was discovered (with the aid of big pharma, and pay the big price to big pharma.  As those sticken with the virus were now allowed - by Fauci - to get meds that might help, they died.  Thousands died.  Unnecessarily.  Because of the dictatorship of Dr. Fauck.  And elderly couples were now allowed to soothe each other.  Isolation was another Fauci Diktat.  6 feet away from all other humans.  No movies, no restaurants, no human contact.  American downtowns have never really recovered from the little dictator's insane policies.  Wear your mask.  Don't come to work; stay home and do it.  No class for kids, no play, no real learning.  At the time I wrote Trump's greatest mistake was promoting Dr. Fauci, making him the authority on the virus, - when he was one of its creators.  Back then, I also nominated Fauci for the Josef Mengele Humanitarian Award, in honor of the German doctor who did so much to keep the flames of the Auschwitz crematorium going.

A German scientist, an expert in retroviruses, wrote in a science journal tha HIV was a harmless virus that had long existed in Africa and was incapable of doing what Dr. Fauci claimed it did.  Fauci, who was early into the HIV game, denounced denounced Peter Duesberg, and with the help of advertisers, had the German banished from scientific journals.  I suggest it's time to review Dr. Fauci's early work on HIV and its very costly meds.  Might the beloved Dr. Fauci been involved in making a harmless virus into the deadly HIV that burst on to the scene in the 1980s?  Killing many thousands.

Meanwhile, we must be satisfied with - he lied to Congress.  I suggest we call him --          Dr. Faucinstein.==                       Hugh Murray

The article below is from R.T.  I hope you can hear Tulsi Gabbards recording.

Fauci lied under oath over Covid-19 probe – outgoing US spy chief

The former White House chief medical adviser allegedly misled the US Congress about his role in shaping intelligence assessments on the pandemic

Published 19 Jun, 2026 21:35 | Updated 19 Jun, 2026 21:47

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Washington, DC, June 03, 2024. ©  Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Anthony Fauci used his position as the leading Covid-19 adviser under two US administrations to steer scrutiny away from the so-called lab leak theory and protect himself from possible accountability, outgoing US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has alleged. She claimed the effort included perjury before the US Congress.

The accusations stem from Fauci’s tenure as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the agency’s funding of gain-of-function research, including work conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The lab leak theory holds that a bat coronavirus altered to infect humans escaped from the Chinese facility and triggered the Covid-19 pandemic. A competing explanation is that SARS-CoV-2 emerged naturally, possibly spreading through a live animal market in Wuhan.

On Friday, her final day in office, Gabbard released hundreds of pages of documents related to the investigation into the disease’s origins and what she described as Fauci’s influence on the US intelligence community. Some of the materials are not classified and were available to the public before the release.

Fauci was “the behind-the-scenes advisor” who together with “his hand-picked so-called experts,” pushed the intelligence community to back the theory of a natural animal origin, Gabbard said. She alleged that his goal was to avoid scrutiny over “dangerous gain-of-function coronavirus research linked to big pharma and their pursuit of universal vaccines worth trillions of dollars.” As one of the most prominent public voices on Covid-19, Fauci allegedly “publicly pushed lies, disinformation, and censorship using every platform available,” she added.

READ MORE: US publishes docs on ‘dangerous’ Ukrainian biolabs

According to Gabbard, the alleged perjury took place in July 2024, when Fauci “denied knowledge of or participation in discussions with intelligence officials about viral research” relevant to Covid-19. Fauci told lawmakers that he had been “briefed” by intelligence agencies on the pandemic, but said his “discussions” were limited to separate cases involving possible terrorist use of biological weapons.

Gabbard also accused Fauci of “creating an atmosphere of intimidation” against supporters of the lab leak theory and whistleblowers who contacted her office. She described the tactics as “straight from the deep state playbook” and called Fauci a “politicized self-serving leader.”

The pandemic began during Donald Trump’s first term, while the vaccination campaign was carried out under President Joe Biden. Republican critics accused the Biden administration of suppressing debate about Covid-19 and pressuring the media in an effort to boost compliance with policies intended to contain the disease. Fauci himself became a politically polarizing figure, with Democrat-leaning outlets presenting him as a foil to Trump.

Last week, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence released documents related to US-funded biolabs operating in Ukraine, some of which were involved in gain-of-function research, according to Gabbard. Russia and other countries have previously accused Washington of effectively funding bioweapons research under the guise of epidemic prevention, arguing that the use of foreign facilities allows the US to bypass domestic restrictions on virus weaponization.

You can share this story on social media:

FROM RT ABOUT THE UK AND RAPE GANGS, AND MEDIA HUSH-UP

 From RT about the UK, but more problems now appearing in Germany too.  Hugh Murray

I have never been to the USSR nor to Putin's Russia.  However, I suspect the article below or any article like it would never have been published during the Soviet days.  HM

Britain’s rape gangs: Here’s what’s in the report the mainstream media is ignoring

Rupert Lowe’s investigation implicates Keir Starmer’s government in the mass victimization of white girls by Pakistani men

Published 17 Jun, 2026 18:16 | Updated 17 Jun, 2026 19:20

RT composite. ©  RT

At least 250,000 British girls suffered sickening sexual abuse by Pakistani gangs, who were enabled by police, social workers, and even Prime Minister Keir Starmer, to commit “child rape on an industrial scale,” British MP Rupert Lowe’s ‘Rape Gang Report’ has detailed. 

Published on Tuesday, the 218-page report makes for sobering reading. It details the decades-long abuse of hundreds of thousands of white British girls – and smaller numbers of white boys and Sikh girls – by organized Pakistani ‘grooming gangs’ in 149 districts of the UK. 

Read more

‘Rocking the multicultural boat’: These Brits spoke the truth about grooming gangs despite threats and attempts to smear them

Witness testimony describes the most depraved acts of sexual violence – including preteen girls raped hundreds of times, threatened with death, and sodomized by dogs – happening in plain sight of the authorities tasked with its prevention.

Put together in just over a year, the report cost £600,000 ($803,000), drew on interviews with hundreds of victims and thousands of Freedom of Information requests, and yet has received zero mainstream coverage. Amid the UK media blackout, here’s what you need to know:

How is the rape gangs report different?

The British government has held several probes into child sexual abuse by so-called ‘grooming gangs’ in northern England before, most notably the Jay Inquiry and Telford Inquiry. However, both of these investigations were narrowly-focused on specific locations, and did not conclude that the gangs were a nationwide phenomenon.

Unlike the Telford and Jay reports, Lowe’s report was not funded by taxpayer money, and focused on the entire UK, rather than just northern England. The investigation was crowdfunded, and the report draws on previous studies, court records, and interviews with survivors to conclude that predominantly Pakistani rape gangs operated in 149 local authority districts in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland – almost half of the UK’s 317 municipalities.

An excerpt from Rupert Lowe's rape gangs report, published June 16, 2026

Lowe’s report explicitly frames the abuse as racially- and religiously-motivated, describing it as “evil that has been, and continues to be, perpetrated by chiefly Pakistani Muslim men against vulnerable young white women and girls.”

How many girls were abused?

Previous reports suggested that around 250,000 women and girls had been raped by grooming gangs since the year 2000, based on extrapolated data from towns like Rotherham and Telford. Lowe’s report describes this number as “a bare minimum,” pointing out the problem of under-reporting encountered by other studies, and the fact that “sexual abuse of all kinds tends to be under-reported.”

Given that Britain’s first instance of gang-rape by Pakistani men was reported in 1955, “victims must number in the hundreds of thousands,” the report states. 

What kind of abuse did the gangs commit against girls?

Witness testimony makes up the bulk of the report. With a few exceptions, including a boy who was raped by a gang of white British men, the cases followed a similar pattern: a working class white girl suffering trauma or abuse at home is groomed by older Muslim men, who provide her with alcohol, drugs, and gifts. Once her trust is gained, the girl is repeatedly raped and physically abused, often by hundreds of men. 

Lowe read some of the most harrowing testimony aloud in a parliamentary session earlier this month, and the report goes into further, explicit detail.

Girls as young as 11 were targeted by men in their 40s and 50s, some of whom invited their relatives to join in the gang rape. The following testimony is drawn straight from the report:

• “Michelle claims she was raped by between six and seven hundred different men over the course of three years”

• “She was… raped by a dog as the men placed bets on whether it would penetrate her vagina or her anus”

• “She was subjected to penetration with objects. She was urinated on. Her legs were held open. She was bitten on the back, cut on the leg and strangled”

• “I was intimidated with guns, and threatened with body parts being cut off with knives”

• “I was beaten, black and blue, raped. Not only sexually raped with their body parts themselves, but with objects as well. I was taken to A&E [Accident and Emergency] because my vagina was split open from a glass bottle.”

Multiple victims described being transported across the UK from one group of abusers to another, with some spending months on end being passed around between rapists.

“It was all of the white girls in every home that I went to. And I mean, I’ve seen girls locked... I remember a man opening the back of a van and I saw maybe 15, 20 girls locked in dog cages. Looked like they’re on drugs.”

Were all the perpetrators Pakistani?

Multiple victims claimed that almost all of their rapists were Muslims of Pakistani descent, with one saying that “98% of them were Pakistani Muslim. If not, they were Iraqi Muslim or Kurdish.”

An excerpt from Rupert Lowe's rape gangs report, published June 16, 2026

In cases that resulted in prosecution, “approximately 87% of those convicted bore distinctively Muslim names,” the report states, citing earlier research. Additional research by Dr. Taj Hargey, an imam at the Oxford Islamic Congregation, estimated that 95% of suspects in grooming gang cases “are of Muslim faith.”

Lowe explicitly links rape with immigration, pointing out that 8,593 rape cases were reported in the year 2000, a number that rose to over 70,000 “when the era of large-scale mass immigration into the country commenced under [former Prime Minister Tony] Blair.”

Were the British police involved?

The 2022 Jay Report criticized police and local authorities for failing to intervene for “fear of being thought racist.” Some of the testimony in Lowe’s report goes further, accusing healthcare staff at care homes of pimping girls out to abusers and allowing Pakistani men to sign girls out of facilities at will, and social welfare workers of returning children to live with gangs of rapists in government-provided housing.

Girls who arrived at police stations after being raped were often treated as child prostitutes who had consented to sex with their adult abusers. One girl was raped by a police sergeant, while another was ordered to drop her case by a Muslim officer who was later convicted of child sex abuse. 

An excerpt from Rupert Lowe's rape gangs report, published June 16, 2026

Parents who attempted to intervene were stonewalled. One mother who told police that her daughter had been abused by “Asian men” was supposedly told “You can’t describe them as Asian men because that’s racist. You should just be glad your child is being taught a different culture” (In the UK, ‘Asian’ typically refers to people of South Asian descent, such as those of Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, or Sri Lankan heritage). 

Was Keir Starmer involved?

Read more

Musk vows to fund lawsuits against UK officials over grooming gangs

The Jay Report accused local authorities in Rotherham of covering up the widespread sexual abuse of young girls, and successive governments have been accused of ignoring the issue and slow-walking official inquiries into the scale of the abuse. In 2025, Labour MPs voted en masse against a Conservative motion calling for a national statutory inquiry into the gangs. Starmer’s party eventually backed down and opened a probe earlier this year.

Lowe’s report describes this probe as “a containment exercise,” focusing on only a few narrow areas and omitting any analysis of the demographic and religious factors behind the abuse. Starmer’s Labour Party, the report claims, was directly involved in covering up the scandal.

At least four Labour councillors and MPs have been convicted of child abuse, while others “either failed to crack down on rape gangs or obstructed efforts to do so.” Among them were:

• Labour councillor Shaun Wright, who remained in charge of children’s services in Rotherham despite knowing about the activities of rape gangs in the city

• London Mayor Sadiq Khan, of Pakistani descent, who denied the existence of grooming gangs in the British capital, despite having evidence proving otherwise

• Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who as director of public prosecutions between 2008 and 2013, let 13,000 pedophiles off with warning letters instead of prosecuting them

What role did Islam play in the abuse?

Lowe’s report claims that the abuse was fueled by the “clannish” culture of British Pakistanis, which ensured that families and relatives stayed silent and protected rapists within their communities. This element of Pakistani society was noted in previous investigations too, with the Telford Report concluding that the “lack of engagement from the Asian community” made establishing the true extent of the abuse impossible.

The document also blames the “racially supremacist attitudes” and “us-and-them mindset” of Muslims, stating that the Quran instructs believers to treat “non-Muslims with contempt,” permits sex slavery of non-Muslims, and discourages Muslims from speaking up, lest they “damage the image of the Muslim community or bring discredit to Islam.”

An excerpt from Rupert Lowe's rape gangs report, published June 16, 2026

Victim testimony suggests that many abusers attempted to provide Quranic justification for their crimes. Some were called “white slags,” “white trash,” or “kuffar bitches” who deserved punishment, and one was told that “her God had abandoned her.”

“I was told that Muslim girls are good and pure, and stay virgins until marriage, but all white girls are slags, and they all sleep with hundreds of people,” one victim recalled. “They are lower than shit under your shoe. They don’t obey Allah, so they deserve to be punished.”

What happens next?

The report recommends “mandatory annual training on group-based child sexual exploitation” for all emergency and social workers, and the prosecution of those who enabled the abuse. Every foreign national convicted of child sexual abuse should “at the very least be deported,” the report states, although Lowe has promised that if his Restore Britain party ever takes power, he would “with the British people’s approval, put them to death.”

However, Lowe is Restore Britain’s only MP, and the party is still a fringe movement. Nigel Farage’s Reform UK dominates the right-wing vote in the UK, and is currently polling at 26%, with Restore Britain languishing at 3%. 

Lowe’s report has not been acknowledged by Labour, the Conservatives, or Reform, and its publication has been met with a near-total media blackout. However, Lowe’s reach on social media – particularly on X, where he is regularly retweeted by Elon Musk – is growing rapidly. According to the Financial Times, Lowe’s posts on the platform regularly garner ten times the engagement of Farage’s, despite him having half as many followers as the Reform UK leader.

Lowe has vowed to turn this attention into action. On Wednesday, he announced that he intends to “name perpetrators and their enablers” in parliament, with the aim of “put[ting] people in prison.” Lowe said that he is also providing law enforcement authorities with evidence needed to reopen old cases, and encouraging victims to file civil lawsuits against their abusers.

The bottom line

An anti-grooming gangs protest in London, England, June 28, 2025 ©  Getty Images

The report points to a wholesale failure in the British government’s duty of care to its children, and thoroughly delegitimizes the institutions of the British state, as well as its leaders.

Previous reports have been swept under the rug by Labour and Tory governments alike, and with the country’s mainstream parties ignoring Lowe’s hearings, there is little to suggest that the reaction to this report will be any different. However, while the government and mainstream media can ignore the report, or write Lowe off as a racist crank, the rape gangs scandal has permanently tarred the British public’s faith in the state.

Just 43% of the public trust the Labour government’s official inquiry into the scandal, with 42% trusting the justice system, 29% trusting social services, and 22% trusting Starmer to handle the issue, according to a 2025 YouGov poll. 

Explainer

You can share this story on social media:

I MUST APOLOGIZE - HUGH MURRAY

i PROMISED TO PROVIDE AN ANSWER TO WHY CHRISTIANITY TRIUMPHED OVER PAGANISM IN THE 300s IN THE ROMAN EMPIRE.  This will take more time than I anticipated.  Worse, it comes during the World Cup, one of the most popular and important sporting events in the world.  I have not forgotten, but I guess events of the years 300 to 399 can wait a little longer.  I urge my Christian readers, who may be angry with my post using Stefano Colberi, a fired late-night tv host, to present the Pagan view.  Despite that powerful presentation, the Pagans lost; the Christians won.  Why?  I will be working on that, but watching football in this century (USA 4, Paraguay 0.  Brazil only tied Morocco.  Shake ups in the international world of football.    Hugh Murray

RT FOLLOW UP ON 40 AMERICAN BIOLABS IN UKRAINE

US-funded biolabs project ‘overwhelmingly’ focused on Russia – ex-CIA analyst

The fact that Washington financed 120 biological laboratories abroad is “disturbing,” Larry Johnson has told RT

Published 13 Jun, 2026 19:54 | Updated 13 Jun, 2026 20:55

FILE PHOTO. ©  Global Look Press / Elisa Schu

Newly released evidence from US Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard suggests that Russia could have been the ultimate target of a US-funded network of biological laboratories around the world, including in Ukraine, Larry Johnson, a former CIA analyst and CEO of BERG Associates, has told RT.

Gabbard published a trove of declassified documents on Friday revealing that Washington had funded 120 biological facilities in over 30 nations. A third of them were located in a single country: Ukraine. According to the documents, laboratories that collaborated with the US Army and other agencies worked with “especially dangerous pathogens,” including anthrax, avian flu, Ebola, plague, and tuberculosis.

READ MORE: US publishes docs on ‘dangerous’ Ukrainian biolabs

“The evidence that has come out shows the overwhelming focus of this program was on Russia,” Johnson said, adding that the scale of the project exceeded anyone’s “darkest fantasy.” “It’s unbelievable,” he added.

Moscow has repeatedly accused Kiev of aiding the US in its biological weapons program.

Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov of Russia’s Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Defense Forces, who led an investigation into the laboratories, was assassinated in 2024, allegedly by Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU). A year earlier, he stated that the US had “conducted dual-use research, including the creation of biological weapons components, in close proximity to Russian borders.”

According to Johnson, all the US-funded laboratories were established “at the initiative” of Washington. The research conducted in those laboratories “has no role in the defense of a country,” he believes. “It is [for] offensive [purposes].”

Watch the full interview here:

This is NOT from RT but from Hugh Murray.  A few days prior to Tulsi Gabbard's departure from her job in Intelligence under Pres. Trump, there was a short report on National Public Radio, which is generally on the left politically.  It revealed that Tulsi had left a file on her desk about the JFK assassination.  Then a CIA agent came in, took the file, and walked out.

It is a long time since 1963 when John Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas.  When will we get all the files?  HM

The fact that Washington financed 120 biological laboratories abroad is “disturbing,” Larry Johnson has told RT

Published 13 Jun, 2026 19:54 | Updated 13 Jun, 2026 20:55

FILE PHOTO. ©  Global Look Press / Elisa Schu

•