LEE HARVEY OSWALD and GUY BANISTER - Rethinking the Past

 It was fall 1955 and I was beginning my senior year at Warren Easton Sen. High School in New Orleans.  A new movie was to play at the huge Saenger Theater on Canal and North Basin Sts.  I would be double dating with Tex Sanders, a tall, friendly guy, and someone with whom I bowled now and then.  My date was someone I'd dated before, and was talking some to Mary Jane, a gal I did  not know.  The theater was packed, and when it ended, it seemed the vast audience let out a collective sigh of relief.  Unlike the tv families, where each week the problems of the family were solved within a half hour, not counting the commercials.  Perhaps the problems portrayed were not too serious, and the family is happy with the dad's solution.  Yet, in this film, 3 families are portrayed, and none are anything like the tv's version of Father Know's Best, Ozzie and Harriet,  et al.  Sal Mineo's parents send him a check for his birthday, Natalie Wood's dad slaps her and calls her a whore; and James Dean's dad is hen-pecked, dominated by his wife while he wears the apron.  The 3 try to form their alternate family for a night or 2.  A rare critique of the family of the 50s.

As we all attended the same school, we saw each other after.  Mary Jane was a pleasant your gal, and she was worried about me.  She had heard I was pushing race-mixing, for example.  She explained, that is communism, and I should talk to her dad who knew about the topic.  He could set me aright.  I did not realize, but her dad was Guy Banister.  She elaborated, he had been a leader of the FBI in Chicago, and knew about the Communist ways of causing trouble.  She wanted me to meet her father.  After Chicago, Guy Banister had served as temporary Supt. of the New Orleans Police Dept.  He then opened a detective agency.

It was possible her dad had already heard of me.  During the summer of 1955 I had attended Pelican Boys State, sponsored by the American Legion.  I had been elected to the Senate, and we were supposed to debate a proposed law in the Louisiana Legislature on our last day.  The Legion was hoping the topic would be required ROTC in all public schools.  I thought a more pressing issue was at hand and should be debated; I proposed the integration of the public schools of Louisiana.  A fellow senator was aghast, and said my proposal should NOT be debated as I was the only person in favor of it.   Suddenly, many other senators stood up and disagreed with my opponent.  We decided to debate integration on the last day.  How would the vote go?  I had no idea.  Nor did the pro-segregationist Legion, but they must have been sufficiently worried, so that they demanded we close the meeting before a vote could be held.

To satisfy Mary Jane, I went to her hope.  Mr. Banister was sorting mail.  I went to him, introduced myself, he grunted.  There was no real dialog, but we both went through the motions to satisfy Mary Jane, who was a sweet, concerned you gal.  

One forgets the turmoil stirred in the South following the 1954 Supreme Court decision overturning a precedent of over half a century, that separate and equal was the proper way to manage racial affairs.  Segregation was actually older than that, but the Plessy decision had made it national policy.  However, in 1954 syddebkt segregatuib was deemed unConstitutional.  The new decision was seen as a threat to our way of life in the South; part of a Communist plot to cause trouble at home.  In May 1955, to commemorate the Black Monday decision of 1954, most Easton students left the school to march downtown to show how they felt about Earl Warren's horrible decision.  The state got time on  the radio to educate the public on this major issue.  Thus, the State Sovereignty Commission had expert witnesses expose the origins of the American Civil Liberties Union.  Founded by a Communist during the era of WWI, it continued to this day as a trouble-making Commie front.  At least 3-hours of radio time were devoted to this expose.

Some leaders of the American Legion were also leaders of LUAC, the Louisiana Un-American Activies Committee.  In 1963, along with the newly elected DA of NO, Jim Garrison, they would raid the offices of the Southern Conference Education Fund, a pro-race mixing group.  Strangely, LUAC did not go after an open Marxist who was then handing out pro-Castro panphlets, and even given an-hour-long interview on WDSU radio.  Strange that LUAC was not interested in Lee Oswald!  Oh, and the pro-Communist Oswald was getting the leaflets from the office of the staunch anti-Communist, Guy Banister.  How strange!    

MORE TO COME,   HUGH MURRAY

Meanwhile, you might find related material that will explain the Oswald-Guy Banister alliance in New Orleans in summer 1963, and much else in an article recommended by Texan Robert Morrow - The latest exposition on this important topic by Jeremy Kuzmarov of Covert Action Magazine: Should Lee Harvey Oswald Be Exonerated? - CovertAction Magazine

In high school, I found the Unitarian Church and joined it.  My first visit, a Black couple sat beside me.  I thought, should I leave?  Isn't this against the law?  I could feel the blood rush to my face.  I decided to stay, and returned, knowing the church was for integration.  I attended Tulane U. on a scholarship.  Met 2 professors at church, one taught at Dillard (HBCU) and his wife taught at Xavier U. a RC HBCU.  They were both of Jewish heritage, refugees from Nazi Europe.  I asked if I could sit in Dr. Iggers history class at Dillard.  A Black who tried to enter Tulane would have been arrested.  I had no trouble at Dillard, sat in the class for a year and made friends.  No arrest.  In spring 1960 I picketed with the new Consumers' League, don't buy where you can't work group.  Sit-ins begin in North Carolina, and spread south.  But nothing happens in New Orleans.  The local NAACP  opposes such actions.  In the Negro Y on Dryages St. in NO, a local chapter of the Congress of Racial Equality CORE is formed.  CORE would sponsor a major training camp for August 1960; 7 members from NO will attend.

One day our teacher/speaker was Jackie Robinson, the baseball player who integrated the major leagues.  It was an election year, and he was openly for Nixon and the Republicans, as were many if not most Blacks in the South who experienced the Democrats as white supremists.  A few days later, to a far smaller audience, Martin Luther King spoke to our CORE group, about his experience in changing the rules with the Montgomery bus boycott.  The reason for the small audience - half of our  CORE folks were in jail.  We had sought to integrate a restaurant inside Shell's City super market.  Most of our goup sat at integrated tables, and they were arrested.  New Orleans Ruth Dispenza and I sat at a table; she was a light-skinned Black, and the waitress thought we were a white couple.  So, no arrest.  King told us he was quietly for Kennedy and the Democrats, though his dad, minister of a major church in Atlanta, favored Nixon and the Republicans.  One reason, Kennedy was a Roman Catholic, and that proved a big drawback even when Al Smith ran against Hoover in 1928.

We returned to NO, and within a week conducted the first sit-in in modern NO history, despite the NAACP's opposition.  The NAACP Youth Chapter quicky supported us with picketing, and the adult organization quietly ended its opposition.  The Mayor and Chief of Police remained hostile, denouncing the violation of state law, and asserted such lawlessness would not be tolerated.  We were arrested, but at night released on bail.  We had missed all meals in jail.  Archie Allen, Black from Dillard, one of the 7 arrested, Carlos Zervigon, Hispanic sympathetic supporter, and I went to a Black place to eat.  We entered and sat at a table.  The waiter approached, "I can serve you (to Archie), but not you two.  He looked again, Wait, I can serve you (Archie) and you (to Carlos), but not you (to me).  Are we going to have a 2nd sit-in the same day.  No.  We just left without eating.

Tulane's policy - students arrested are suspended until proven innocent.  I hhad a weekend job at a Tulane library and was a grad student, but now all was up in the air.  I could not stay home, so went from one friend to another that week.  My dad let me keep the car.  Tulane's Board relented - the old rule for usual crimes would remain, but these were political crimes, so the punishment would not occur.  Meanwhile the local judge had other ideas.  When the 7 of us sat together in his court room, when he entered, he began shouting at us for integrating his court in violation of state laws, and he would hold us in contempt if we did not sit properly.  The 2 whites moved to the side.  We were all found guilty and became convicted felons, years before Donald Trump would be given the same title.

Meanwhile, Oliver, the other white from NO who had gone to Miami, and was arrested there, was tired of living in a distant burb and wanted to live in the city of NO, and I needed a place,  We decided to look for a place together.  Found one, furnished, $45 a month, living room, bed room, kitchen, bath.  2 blocks from the St. Charles street car line.  I barely knew Oliver.  In Miami we were assigned rooms to integrate the conference, so I roomed with 2 Black students and was surprised when they did not shave in the morning but used a depilatory cream to dissolve the hair.  I learned more about Oliver when we moved together.  First, his annoying habit of never looking at you directly when speaking to you, I found the reason - he was legally blind.  He probably did not know precisely where my eyes were.  I learned he had a rough time growing up, was on the path to becoming a juvenile delinquent, quitting school, etc.  There were 2 people who would set him on the proper path, one a relative, who taught him the basics so he could be an electrician.  If all else failed, he would have a job.  Second, he joined the Civil Air Patrol, and its leader David Ferrie, a pilot who seemed to know so much, pushed Oliver to return to school and go on despite his disability.  David Ferrie was gay, but Oliver, I found out as his roommate, was strictly straight.  Ferrie pushed Oliver to go on, and he did so at Loyola U. (next door to Tulane U).  In time, I was paid to read some of Oliver's sociology text books to him.  Father Fichter at Loyola was pushing him too.  Oliver was a year or 2 older than I was but seemed much more self assured of himself.

One night I returned, and Oliver said, "*i want you to learn how to use this," as  he handed me a box.  I opened it, and surprise, it was a pistol.  A Ruger, like the famous German Luger.  But I had applied for a draft status as a conscientious objector.  Our efforts in CORE were using non-violence to change society.  How can I now start to use a gun?  My parents were getting threating calls on the phone all the time, but no one was after them - it was me they wanted.  We never got such calls, but the reason: we had no telephone.  Maybe the enemy was outside just outside, but we would not know until too late..  Am I supposed to let the blind guy defend us?  While I do nothing?  No, I could not throw this burden on a legally blind man.  I would have to learn how to use the pistol.  And a few weeks later, I wrote my draft board, I was no longer claiming a CO status.  

Around 1952 or53 I graduated from 8th grade at Benjamin Elementary, a co-ed public school.  Next year I planned to attend S J Peters Boys High, for 4 years of high school.  But the entire school system changed, no more boys and girls separate highs, all public highs would be co-ed.  And junior highs were introduced, So K-6, followed by 7-9 for jun. high, and then 10-12 for sen. high.  All co-ed.  So instead of boys high, I went to 9th grade at Beauregard Jun. High, for one year.  That same year in the 8th grade classes was Lee Harvey Oswald.  It is possible we spoke, perhaps in a lunch line, "How much is that?"  In reality we never met, nor did we converse.  Oswald attended Beauregard for 2 years.  At the same time he became a member of the Civil Air Patrol, headed by David Ferrie.  If Ferrie could help other troubled youths, why not Oswald?  Some say while in NYC Oswald had become a juvenile delinquent and was influenced by communists.  Ferrie was strongly anti-Communist, working with refugees from Castro's Cuba, working for Carlos Marcello's mafia, and with Guy Banister and other anti-coms.    When Oswald finished junior high, he could go on to Easton - my high school.  Instead he wanted to join the marines.  How many 17-y-o American communists want to join the marine corps?  I suspect, far more probable, the patriotic Ferrie pushed Oswald in the patriotic direction.  Oswald's mom said a man in a uniform urged her to sign papers so he could join up younger than the usual age.  She did so.  And Oswald joined up.  A patriot!

What did Oliver do after graduation from Loyola, - he signed up with the US Aide for International Development, and he would go to Laos (next to Vietnam) in 1962+.  When he returned, he married, had children and led in improving computers and other devices for the blind and other handicapped.  There is a building named for him on the UNO campus.

Was Oswald following a similar path?  What went wrong?

One more thing re the Oswald-Banister connection.  In summer of 1963 I finally finished my MA Thesis and would be able to graduate in August with a Master's degree.  My thesis was long, some 260 pages on the Scottsboro, Ala. rape cases of the 1930s, in which I discussed the conflict between the NAACP and a Communist front group, the International Labor Defense, for control of the case and contrast in tactics. Summer in NO is hot and humic, but I was going to the Tulane Library, which like most air-conditioned buildings of that era, was cold, so I had to carry a sweater on entering.  Summer break, and few were in the library.  I opened the door and no one.  Near the stairs was a small table, and today there was a stack of leafets on it.  As I passed it, I read, "Hands off Cuba, the Fair Play for Cuba Committee."  I only knew one person who had been involved with Fair Play in another city, a Tulane U. grad student in philosophy.  I took a leaflet, and went to look for him in the library's closed area except for grad students.  He was at his desk.  I raised the leaflet so he could see it, and asked, "What are you putting out?"  "Iet me see that."  He knew nothing about it, nor did I.  Should we send our names to the PO address on the leaflet?  I joked, well, it might be the FBI.  We decided to do nothing till we knew more.  He took the leaflet and taped it to the door to his dorm room.  Where it remained until November. 1963.

On Tuesday, 26 November I was back from my new teaching job, and my mom told me 2 men at the front door wanted to speak with me.  They wanted to know about the leaflet.  I explained, I had thought it was published by a friend, Harold Alderman, a philosophy student at Tulane, but he knew nothing about it.  Nor did I.  I did not follow up with an letter to the address on the leaflet.  They asked of my views on Kennedy, and I said, look at the back of my car, I retained the Kennedy sticker for the 1960 election.  They left.  Soon after, the phone rang.  It was Alderman telling me he had given my name to the FBI.  Neither of us knew about the origin of the leaflets.  The irony, had we written to the address, it would have gone to the office of Guy Banister, anti-com so he could have added our names to his list of local commies.  The first book that mentions me is a volume of the Warren Report, perhaps v. 26, that describes this incident.  I suspect I was already on Banister's enemies list.

One ajent asked me if I had heard of anyone having connections to Oswald.  I had gone out Friday night to a bar looking for friends.  "Who the hell is Oswald?" was my question.  One person told me they had heard Bob Heller, a Tulane student had seen Oswald distributing leaflets in NO and had spoken to him.  The agent took notes, and later interviewed Heller.  Heller had seen Oswald leafletting and wondered if he might need legal help, but did not talk to Oswald.  Sineibe called me a fink every time he saw me on campus.  I have no regrets about cooperating to find what happened in Dallas.  Would I have a right to criticize the Warren Commission if I had not cooperated with its inquiry? 

When the FBI agents came to see me, I basically said I knew nothing, because that is what I thourht at that time.  In the summer of 1963 I had no idea the Fair Play leaflets were stsored at the office of Guy Banister.  I had no idea that Oswald was working out of Banister's office, and the 2 appeared together in various locals.  Had I known that the week after the assassination, I would have brought that up with the FBI.  But I would not learn of the Oswald-Banister connection until the Garrison probe of the later 1960s.  How could the vehiment anti-com Banister work with the self proclaimed Marxist Oswald.  It is the subject the government sought to avoid.  Another reason they hated Garrison, the only elected official in the US to openly challenge the lies of the Warren Report.

WHILE THE MASS MEDIA AND DEMOCRATS SEEM ENRAPTURED WITH EACH NEW PHOTO, AND LETTER FROM THE EPSTEAIN FILES, WE FORGET WHAT MAY BE THE LAST HOPE TO GET SOME TRUTH ABOUT WHO KILLED JFK IN DALLAS IN 1963

 I asked Google AI the following question.  It's answers demand further questions and answers.  Will they ever open the real files?

I attended PTS Beauregard Junior High for a year with Oswald.  I never knew him, though it is possible I may have asked him, "How much is this?" as we moved through a lunch line.  About 1,000 students, I was in the 9the grade classes; he was in the 8th.  If he ever attended Warren Easton Senior High, he did so for less than a month, and again, I did not know him.  At Easton, I had met Banister's daughter, Mary Jane' she was the date of a friend Tex Sanders and we had double dated to go to the large Saenger Theater on Canal St. to see "Rebel without a Cause."  The theater was packed and at the film's conclusio, it seemed the packed theater exhaled a breath of relief.  All the tv family programs of that era, like Father Knows Best, the Nelson Family (with little Ricky) were families that were all terrific, a minor problem each week, solved within a half hour.  None of the families of Rebel were ideal, Sal Mineo's never appeared, Natalie Wood's dad slapped her and called her a slut; James Dean's was usually wearing an apron and not heading the family against the mom's dominance.  The film itself was a Rebellion against the 1950s illusions of comfort and conformity.

Mary Jane and I met then for the first time.  We both attended Easton, and she had heard disturbing things about me.  She was concerned, worried, I might be moving into the communist camp, talking about race-mixing and things like that.  She thought I should meet her dad, who was an expert on the subject as he had been a leader of the FBI in Chicago before coming to New Orleans.  (Indeed, Banister had been Acting Superintendent of the New Orleans Police for a time).  He now headed a detective agency, and Mary Jane urged me to come to their home and talk to her dad, and get some sense in my head.  I went to her home, and Guy was then sorting mail, standing by a table.  I approached and introduced myself; he grunted, and kept sorting.  I was the only one speaking, and kept it short.  Mary Jane was a pleasant, likeable gal, and I did what she requested, and Guy probably did too.  Clearly neither of us were enthused about the meeting, but to please her we did so.  Later I learned that Banister was one of the "conservatives" who would pay young people to spy on youthful radicals.  I will discuss more on the atmosphere in New Orleans in that era in the forthcoming book.

In summer of 1963 I entered the Tulane Library and on a small table in the foyer was a stack of leaflets [ Fair Play for Cuba Committee, what many deemed a pro-Castro organization.  I picked up one; there was no one else around.  Iread it later and discussed it with a grad student in philosophy.  Hae either of us sent a letter to the address on the leaflet, it would have ended in the office of anti-com Guy Banister.

Are we really to assume that the Fed. Govt. had no files on Oswald with Banister, David Ferrie, the CIA training camp north of Lake Pontchartrain shut down in July 1963?  Stop forcing the Dept. of Justice to go through every Epstein pimple, and go to WHO MURDERED JFK.

Hugh Murray

why did "marxist" Lee Oswald work with staunch anti-communist Guy Banister in New Orleans in 1963 on the Fair Play for Cuba Committee?

The relationship between the Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald and the staunchly anti-communist Guy Banister in New Orleans during the summer of 1963 is a central mystery in JFK assassination research. While official government investigations generally concluded Oswald was a "loner," evidence and testimony suggest their collaboration served specific, often conflicting, tactical goals

. 

Key Evidence of the Connection

• Shared Address (544 Camp Street): Oswald distributed Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) leaflets that were stamped with the address 
  544 Camp Street
  . This was the side entrance to the Newman Building, which also housed Banister's private detective agency at 
  531 Lafayette Street
  .
• Witness Testimony: Banister’s secretary, Delphine Roberts, stated that Oswald visited the office frequently and "seemed to be on familiar terms with Banister". She also claimed Banister explicitly told her Oswald was "one of ours" and was working for him.
• Proximity to CIA-Linked Figures: Banister was a former FBI official who ran an anti-communist intelligence network and worked with David Ferrie, an anti-Castro pilot who had known Oswald since the Civil Air Patrol. 

Primary Theories for Their Cooperation

There are several major theories explaining why these two ideological opposites would work together:

• Establishing a "Legend" (Cover Story): Researchers suggest Banister was helping Oswald build a public persona as a fanatical pro-Castro Marxist. This "legend" could serve as cover for infiltrating leftist groups or, as some theorists argue, to later frame Oswald as a Cuban asset in the event of an assassination.
• Provocateur Operations: Evidence suggests Oswald’s FPCC activities were designed to provoke reactions. For example, Oswald staged a street fight while handing out leaflets to gain media attention and bolster his pro-Castro image, which some believe was a tactic to flush out communist sympathizers for Banister.
• Intelligence Infiltration: Some believe Oswald was a low-level informant or "asset" for the FBI or CIA. In this scenario, Banister, who maintained close ties with government agencies, acted as a handler while Oswald attempted to infiltrate the DRE (Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil), a CIA-funded anti-Castro group.
• Anti-Castro Schemes: Delphine Roberts believed their association was related to anti-Castro operations, potentially including gun-running or training Cuban exiles, activities Banister was known to support. 

Despite these accounts, the Warren Commission did not find credible evidence of a link, and the CIA has historically denied any official relationship with either man. However, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) later acknowledged that Oswald did indeed associate with anti-communist figures in New Orleans. 

THE JFK ASSASSINATION - WHITEWASHING AS EASY AS ABC-TV

I watched the 2-hour special Monday night (24 Nov 2025) and was shocked. This was a rehash of the type of special one would have seen in 1964 to bolster the Warren Commission, and repeated every decade or so with Dan Rather and other big names in the news to reassure us that the Warren Commission was correct, the magic bullet went through Kennedy's back/shoulder and out of his throat, thence to wound Texas Gov. Connally in various places, and emerge almost like new. Well, here they go again. Perhaps they are counting on many young viewers have no real knowledge of the events of 1963, so they cannot question the "information provided' on the program. 

     I am 87, a year older than Lee Oswald. My memory is not as sharp as before. But I sat fuming at the program. For example, on Oswald's background, it points out that he attended 20 different schools growing up, showing an unstable youth. However, when the young Oswald, who was born in New Orleans, returned, he attended P T G Beauregard Junion High 1952-1954. If he had problems adjusting, so did everyone else, as the School Board that year decided to integrate both junion and senior highs. I am not speaking of racial integration, that was clearly illegal in Louisiana and throughout the Solid South, but mixing boys and girls in the same schools, including high schools and the newly established junior highs. The previous system K-8, and the sexually divided high schools 9-12th grades ceased; replaced by K-6, 7-9, 10-12, all co-ed. Oswald did well enough to graduate from Beauregard in 2 years in 1954. Also important to his development, he joined the Civil Air Patrol, headed by a charismatic man, David Ferrie.

    I never met Ferrie, but I had a roommate who had had problems as a youth. Although I attended Tulane U., and he was a student at Loyola U. of the South, we met in the late 1950s at an intercollegiate interracial gathering at Loyola. I barely knew him, and he never looked me in the eye when conversing, so I assumed he was not interested in what I was saying. We both attended a CORE training institute in Miami in August 1960, where one day our teacher was Jackie Robinson, another day, Martin Luther King. It was only when we roomed together back in New Orleans did I discover that he was legally blind. No wonder he did not look people in the eyes, he probably was lucky to see the who person.  He told me he was on the path to becoming a juvenile delinquent, but the CAP and David Ferrie saved him, pushed him to return to school, gave him hope, etc. If Ferry could perform miracles with my roommate, perhaps he could do the same with Oswald. Ferry was gay, but my roommate was strictly straight. I suspect he may have done the same for Oswald. At any rate, Oswald did not want to continue to Warren Easton Senior High, but would continue his education elsewhere; he got his mom to sign papers so he could enlist in the Marines at 17. Some talk about Oswald as pro-communist as a youth. Are Communists anxious to enlist in the Marines at 17? By the way, Beauregard was the officer honored to give the command to CSA troops to fire on Fort Sumpter and start the American Civil War. After graduation from Loyola, my former roommate went off to Laos in the early 1960s with the US AID. He returned to NO, married and had 2 children, and led in many ways to improve the opportunities for the blind and handicapped. A university building is now named for him.  Meanwhile, Oswald ended in Japan working around the secret U2 flights. Ferrie was a very conservative patriot, and would clearly influence the youths in the CAP. Ferrie was a good pilot, and somehow involved in the Bay of Pigs invasion. He was furious when Pres. Kennedy failed to come to the rescue of the invaders, and later, in a speech, I think at Springhill college on the Mississippi coast, declared that Pres. Kennedy "should be shot." He lost is job as an airline pilot on a morals charge, but Car;ps Marcello and the Mafia also called upon Ferrie. Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy's crusade against crime, led him to deport important New Orleans Mafia leader Carlos Marcello, and apparently left him in Guatemala in a jungle, wearing his expensive shoes. Some allege that Rob Kennedy hoped that Marcello would die.  Marcello survived however, reached civilization, and got Ferrie to come and fly him back into the US. 

     When Oswald defected to the Soviet Union, was it real? Or was he still a Marine, doing secret work? After a few years, he wanted out of the USSR, and had no troubles with American authorities in returning.. True, he had a dishonorable discharge from the Marines, but if the Marines were to send other undercovers to the Soviets, perhaps that was a way to keep the pretense going. 

     When Oswald returns to the US, and then to NO in 1963, who does he hang out with? The super anti-communist Guy Banister. Banister's office is where the pro-Castro leaflets, handed out by Oswald on the streets of NO, are stored; the address of the building is used on the Hand Off Cuba leaflets. Some say Oswald was seen at the CIA training center north of Lake Pontchartrain, where the Cuban refugees were preparing for a new and hopefully successful Bay of Pigs invasion to liberate Cuba. Pres. Kennedy was inching toward a rapprochement with the Communists and did not want another Bay of Pigs. But could he count on his head of CIA to close the camp? No! JFK needed someone he trusted to shutter the CIA camp; his brother Robert, Atty. Gen., was also in charge of the FBI. He got the FBI to close the CIA training camp in July 1963.  Some said, this act by the President sealed his fate.  It meant he was not interested in liberating Cuba, or standing up against the communists elsewhere, or so it seemed to many conservatives.

       Why was anti-com Banister working with Oswald to print and distribute Fair Play for Cuba leaflets and that pro-Castro organization? Perhaps Oswald was being prepared to appear as a communist, or surely a Marxist.  And with this new appearance, perhaps he was to assassinate someone, maybe like Fidel or another prominent figure! In September 1963 Oswald is in Mexico City trying to get into Cuba, making anti-Kennedy statements. But, it did not work; they did not let him in. MORE LATER

     If the now identified "Marxist" Lee Oswald could not get into Cuba or back into the USSR, what could he do for the cause? On 9 November 1963 anti-com Joseph Milteer was recorded on a wire by FBI undercover Willie Somersett, a childhood friend of Milteer.  Milteer assured his friend that it was all set up, someone from a tall building would shoot the President, and they had a stooge who would quickly be arrested and blamed, while the real assassins could get away.  Milteer added that people in Miami, New Orleans, and California were in on the action.  One can hear this recoded conversation on YouTube.  Was Oswald's new mission to be unbeknownst to him, a patsy?

       More on the ABC program; basically they declare what others call the magic bullet to be what really happened - Oswald shoots Kennedy's upper back, the bullet exits his neck, and then goes on to wound Gov. Connally in many places, and emerges almost like new. 

    In the late 1960s I was teaching at a university and had time between classes, time which I used to attend sessions of the DA Garrison trial against NO businessman Clay Shaw.  One day a doctor from the Bethesda Naval Hospital, one of the doctors who performed the autopsy on Pres. Kennedy.  He was questioned under oath.  Dr. Pierre Finck asserted he was beginning to probe the path of the bullet that entered the President's back, and which according to the official line must exit his throat and the go on to do damage to Connally, - this is a crucial probe.  Dr. Finck began, but then he related he was ordered to stop.  Who ordered that.  I don't know as there were many Admirals and Generals in the room.  Thus, with that answer of Dr. Finck, two important facts emerge.  One - the entire picture of the media, and the government, and the Warren Commission of one gunman shooting from behind the President WAS NOT CONFIRMED in the autopsy.  Recall, the physician in Dallas thought the neck wound was an entry wound, not an exit wound.  Two - Finck's reply  makes clear who was in charge of the proceedings, not the doctors but the military.  Moreover, some photos show a large part of the back of Kennedy's head being broken off, indicating a shot from the front.  Some allege there were fake photos showing a smaller back head wound.

    Garrison failed to convict Shaw, and had I been on the jury, I too would have voted not guilty.  But New Orleans Dist. Atty. Jim Garrison did expose how the government united to destroy his expose of the fraudulent conclusions of the Warren Report.  Governors refused to let subpoenaed witnesses come to NO for trial.  National magazines carried many stories belittling his case.  Only in the 1990s with Oliver Stone's provocative film "JFK" did the opponents of the official conclusion get a fair hearing, and viewing.  I don't recall enough of the ABC program to add more criticism to my post.  The ABC Special sought to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, but too much has been exposed for that to be successful at this late date. 

   I hope the Trump Administration will finally open all the files so we can see if the government told the truth to the American people, or simply lied, and lied, and lied.

     Hugh Murray

 

Did the Right Wing Kill Pres. Kennedy? Jeffrey Caufield's Research

GENERAL WALKER AND THE MURDER OF PRESIDENT KENNEDY:

The Extensive New Evidence of a Radical Right Conspiracy (Moreland Press, 2015)

By JEFFREY CAUFIELD

Rev. by Hugh Murray

                  I begin with some of my background related to this 1,000-page book:  1) I attended P T G Beauregard Jr. High in New Orleans, 1952-53, a year when Lee Oswald was also a student there.  As there were a thousand students, and we were in different grades, I never knew him.  2)  From 1953-1956 I attended Warren Easton Sr. High, also in NO.  Some report that Oswald attended Easton for about a month in 1954 before he enlisted on his 17^th birthday in the Marines.  Again, I did not know him.  3)  In the mid-1950s I began to attend the First Unitarian Church in NO, and my conservative views were challenged, especially on the race issue.  About May 1955, a year after the US Supreme Court’s notorious decision overturning segregation in schools, students at Easton chose to demonstrate their disapproval of the “Black Monday” decision.  Almost all students left the school to march in protest, stopping street cars, and demanding continued good schools through segregation.  This was one demo in which I did not partake, and was one of the few who remained inside the school.

            4)  In the summer of 1955 I attended Pelican Boys’ State, organized by the American Legion (an organization that features prominently in Caufield’s book).  (A few years later student Bill Clinton would meet John Kennedy at the Arkansas Boys’ State, and be inspired to enter politics)  (In Louisiana, Bayou Boys’ State was conducted for incoming Black high-school seniors; of course, all our schools were still segregated.)  I was elected to the Pel. Senate, and on the final day of the conclave, we would take over the La. State Senate Chamber and debate a law that we thought should be enacted.  One Pel. Senator proposed that all public high schools include a ROTC program for basic military training.  One suspects the Legion was delighted with this suggestion.  Instead, I proposed the integration of public schools in Louisiana as the legislation we debate on the night of big publicity in the Capitol Senate.  I suspect the Legionnaires were less pleased with my idea.  Another Pel. Senator thought my proposal a poor choice, for I was the only Senator who favored it.  Suddenly many other Pel. Senator rose to disagree with him and support my proposal.  We were high school jun/seniors in Louisiana in 1955.  Indeed, we did debate my proposal for integrated schools on the big night, but, probably because there was a close division of opinion, no vote was taken because the officials informed us, “we ran out of time.”

            5)  Because I had moved so far to the Left and favored integration, some high school friends showed concern.  Probably in the spring of 1956, a very sweet student, Mary Jane, urged me to speak with her father whom she thought could put some sense into my head.  I was not enthusiastic about such a meeting, and, turns out, neither he.  So, we went through the motions to satisfy a kind young woman.  I went to her home and met her father, Guy Banister, while he was sorting mail.  He said little to me other than some grunts.  He did not convert me from my turn to the Left.  Mary Jane and I remained friends.

6)  From 1956-60 I attended Tulane U. in NO on scholarship, eventually deciding to major in American history.  Also, at the Unitarian Church I met one of my professors, Georg Iggers and his wife Wilma, both refugees from Nazi Europe, and both teaching at Black colleges in NO.  Georg also taught a few courses at Tulane, in one of which I had enrolled.  One day, I asked him if I might sit-in one of his classes at Dillard, and proceeded to attend his class on the Black campus about twice a week.  In that class I met Shirley Dede, who told me they were organizing a Youth Chapter of the NAACP.  I joined.  Shirley also subscribed to Workers World, a Trotskyist newspaper.  The youth chapter did little, for soon the NAACP was outlawed in Louisiana, using a 1924 anti-KKK law.(p. 723.  Caufield states the injunction against the NAACP was issued in 1956, but I do not think the organization closed down in Louisiana until about 1958 or 59.)  The adult NAACP was then reincarnated as the New Orleans Improvement Assn.

            7)  In Feb. 1960 the modern sit-in movement started in North Carolina and spread in much of the South.  Today, one forgets that New Orleans was still the largest city in the South in 1960 as it had been since 1840.  The 60 census figures had not yet been published so.  NO was still viewed larger than Miami, Houston, Dallas, and Atlanta.  Meanwhile, the civil rights movement seemed unable to crack the South’s largest city.  Tulanian Lanny Goldfinch informed me in the spring of 1960 that there would be a meeting at Dillard to organize a sit-in in NO.  I went.  There was an awareness that such action would likely bring arrests, and many in the large hall were hoping to avoid such drastic consequences.  The Dillard Dean was able to persuade the students not to be imitative of others, not to simply sit-in as had been done elsewhere, but to do something unique to Dillard.  There would be a march for civil rights on the sidewalk in front of Dillard campus.  I felt that was an operation for Dillard students and did not participate.  There were no arrests.

            8)  Later that spring Lanny Goldfinch told me the Consumers’ League (a Black group) would be picketing shops in the Dryades Street area that refused to hire Blacks.  Both Lanny and I picketed for short periods with the League on different days.  9)  Late spring, summer 1960, national Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) sought to form a group in NO.  With some from the Consumers League and students from various universities, CORE began to meet at the Negro YMCA on Dryades St.  There would be a 3-week training program in Miami that August, and CORE sought participants from NO.  Seven of us went and an 8^th was a driver.  I had trouble convincing my parents to allow me on this excursion, but I could point to another white who was also going.  He was a staunch Roman Catholic, a junior at Loyola U. in NO.  He was a year or 2 older than I.  As a youth he had had troubles, dropping out of school, and on the road to becoming a “juvenile delinquent.”  But Oliver St. Pe was saved when he joined the Civil Air Patrol and was guided in the right direction by its leader, David Ferrie.  I did not know it at the time, but Oliver was legally blind.  In Miami there were only about 45 official participants from all over the country with 7 from NO indicating how important CORE assessed New Orleans for the future of the organization.  One day we had a lecture by baseball great Jackie Robinson, who was also a firm supporter of the Republicans led by Richard Nixon that election year.  Another day we had a lecture by Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., who, then off the record, was for Democrat Jack Kennedy.  We had training in non-violence and how to conduct demonstrations.  In one sit-in, Oliver and 16 others of our CORE conclave were arrested.

            10)  Shortly after we returned to NO, we organized for the sit-in.  Tulane seemed to know about our plans, and read us the rules that, if arrested, we would be suspended until proven innocent (which, if lucky would have to await a US Supreme Court decision, which would take years).  (Suddenly many more people were coming to the CORE meetings, and one stood out because he was fatter and looked older than most white college students.  In today’s p.c. world, we should not notice things like that but we do.  I remember George Higginbotham because he looked unusual for a white student.  I had no idea at the time he was employed by Guy Banister to spy on the Left.)(41)  I was entering TU as a grad student in history.  Happily, there was another white Tulanian, so with 5 Blacks we had 7 in the first sit-in.  (Our defiance led eventually to a change of Tulane’s rules and neither Bill Harrell nor I was kicked out.)  I moved from my parents, but that did not stop the threatening phone calls (all our names had been in the local papers, and we had been on national TV, though we did not see that as we were still in jail for the nightly news shows.  My father had to borrow a pistol and bullets from a co-worker to defend the house.  In November 1960, when the NO integrated school crisis erupted, the hate-crowd moved on to that issue, and my dad felt safe enough to return the items to his co-worker.  The worker asked him, “Why did you borrow so many bullets?  Only one would have done the job.”  I was not too popular with some union members.  11)  To restore honor to the family, my father’s brother, my uncle, sent $20 to George Lincoln Rockwell’s Nazi Party.  His wife, my aunt Vera, would have trouble on her side of the family in a few years.  Her relative, a pastor of a Methodist Church on Esplanade Ave., formed the Quorum Club beside his church and across the street from the French Quarter.  It was probably in 1963 when the police raided the club and arrested about 33 in attendance and the papers printed their names and addresses on page 1.  The police said it was a hangout for homosexuals, drug users, and race mixers.  Vera had been razzing my Uncle Jim about me, but suddenly she had a black sheep on her side of the family too.  I don’t know if Jim sent more money to Rockwell about the Quorum Club.

            12)  Also during these years, my mother’s Avon lady lived a few doors down the street.  She was attractive, rather young, and the wife of an American Legionnaire activist who in 1960, was elected as a Democratic member of the State legislature, James Pfister.  Pfister would lead the raid on SCEF in October 1963, an important key to Caufield’s understanding of the Kennedy assassination.  I point this out to show that in NO people on the Left had connections, sometimes relations, to those on the Right.

            13)  In 1962-63 I returned to Tulane as a grad student, but I changed the topic of my thesis.  I had heard the reason no legitimate Black organization could work with Communists was because of what they had done during the Scottsboro campaign.  So my topic was the Scottsboro rape cases that began in 1931 Alabama.  I tried to be objective: my title “The NAACP vs. the Communist Party” was neutral enough, but my conclusion was that the CP and its front group the International Labor Defense had saved the 9 young Blacks accused of rape, while the approach of the NAACP would have led to their conviction and likely executions.  Although several chapters have since been published in academic journals, the Tulane history dept, then headed by “the Confederates” was determined that I not remain at Tulane for a doctorate.  I worked hard on the thesis, some 270 pages.  But I was slow and could not finish in time to receive my degree in May.  So I had to work harder to finish in the summer of 1963 with little time for political protest.  I received my MA in August 1963.

            14)  In Nov. 1962 I published an article in The Reed, the left-wing alternative to the Tulane Hullabaloo.  I titled it, “The Munich of the 60s,” in which I analyzed the recent missile crisis with an analogy.  I compared Kennedy’s demands for removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba, a sovereign nation, to German demands upon Czechoslovakia concerning the Sudetenland; and I compared Khrushchev’s yielding to Kennedy’s demands to Chamberlain’s concessions to Hitler at Munich.  I entered a class room and saw copies of The Reed, not torn in half, not in quarters, but into fingernail-size fragments.  My article was not popular.

            15)  Summer 1963 when Oswald was most active in NO, I was busy finishing up my MA thesis.  Friends, a history student and his wife told me they had heard an unusual discussion on WDSU radio with a Marxist who had lived in Russia and was involved in a pro-Castro group in NO.  I may have seen an Oswald leafleting incident on local TV news.  16)  One afternoon I walked into the Tulane U. Library (now Joseph Jones Hall) and on a small table in front of the glass to the staircase was a stack of leaflets – Hands Off Cuba!  I took one, and went upstairs to the carrels (desks) behind the book stacks to find a grad student friend who had been involved in Fair Play in another city.  “What are you putting out?”  “Let me see that.”  Harold Alderman knew nothing about it.  Who might be organizing then?  There was only a post office box address on the flyer.  Should we respond?  I joked, it might be the FBI.  Neither of us made contact with the address.  Harold did tack the leaflet to his dorm-room door - until Nov. 22.

            17)  Even with my MA, the best job I could get was teaching 5^th grade at a brand new private school in NO.  It payed higher than public schools, and better, there were fewer pupils per class.  There were 3 of us teaching 5^th, Mrs. Flagg who was much older and had taught in the public schools; and Richard Humphries, a new grad who was born in British Guyana.  He and I  became friends, and one autumn afternoon after school, we played tennis.  Consequently, I arrived home late (I was back at my parents).  When I arrived, my mother greeted me with, “Huh, I thought they had rounded you up too.”  I did not know what she was referring to, but rushed to the TV as it was news time.  Oct. 4, 1963, the Louisiana UnAmerican Activities Committee (led by neighbor Jim Pfister) and over 100 police and troopers raided the SCEF offices and the homes of James Dombrowski, Ben Smith, and Bruce Walzer.  A good friend was a junior law partner in Smith’s firm, and Jack Peebles wondered if he too was to be arrested.  The SCEF raid is a pivotal event in Caufield’s book and analysis.

            18)  Life went on.  Work went on.  I was teaching around midday, when Mrs. Flagg, whose class was directly across the hall, came to me and requested that I come to her class.  I told my class I would return shortly, and went with the older woman.  Her class was then having a combo lunch and recess, and as we had no cafeteria, they were eating in class and playing about, shouting, but not out of hand.  One boy had brought with him a new invention, a transistor radio, and he was listening.  Mrs. Flagg and I then hovered over the boy trying to hear the radio above the din of the kids playing.  I heard and then had to return to my class.  I entered and announced, “I just heard on the radio, Pres. Kennedy was shot in Dallas.”  The kids immediately cheered and applauded.  I was taken aback.  One girl, the exception, put her head on the table and cried.  The others expressed glee.  These were 10 and 11-year-olds, and a few older ones.  I normally liked them very much, but suddenly I was angry.  “You think that this means the end of integration.  You think that this means segregation will be the law of the land.  After the Civil War, some thought that the South could rise again, if only Lincoln were dead.  They killed him.  Instead of making it easier for the defeated South, it made the North more determined to destroy slavery, to destroy the plantations, to destroy most things connected to the South.  The result was Radical Reconstruction, and for many white southerners it was a difficult time.  Killing Lincoln made things more difficult.  Killing Kennedy will make things more difficult.”  Those were not my exact words but it was the message of my unscheduled history lecture.

            19)  The school let us out early that Friday afternoon.  I went home and soon thereafter received a phone call from Shelly, the wife of Carlos Zervigon.  Carlos was of Mexican-Cuban heritage, a friend and fellow Tulanian 1956-60, and a former member of CORE during the year I was active 1960-61.  Shelly was less politically active, but went along with her husband.  On the phone she asked if I had heard the news.  “About Kennedy?  Of course.”  “You know they found the assassin.”  “No.”  “He’s a communist from New Orleans.”  “What?!”  I could hardly believe her words.  A communist from NO?  My mind is blank on the rest of our conversation. I suddenly began to fear.  If they are rounding up “communists” in NO in October over nothing, what will happen now?  Many assumed I was a communist.  I knew that in 1938 a young Jew entered the German Embassy in Paris and shot an official.  A few days later, the Nazi government hammered its revenge, the first major pogrom in Nazi Germany with burnings of numerous synagogues, massive arrests of Jews, some killings, and so many shop windows shattered it was called Kristallnacht.  And that was for the assassination of a minor official.  What would happen here with a NO communist killing the President?

            20)  That Friday night I went out to get drunk, thinking it might be my last chance before the roundup.  I met a few friends, and had the same question – “Who the hell is Lee Oswald?”  No one I spoke with that night ever knew him.  Later that year, I began to feel lucky that I never knew him, and that no one on the Left seemed to have known him.  That was my basic feeling until the Garrison probe, when I learned that Oswald had right-wing associates in NO.  Caufield’s book provides even more evidence that Oswald was associated with the far right wing in New Orleans and Texas.  Caufield has amassed far more research on this aspect of Oswald, and his book should be kept as a reference work.

            This book is 1.000 pages with footnotes at the back, so you must refer back and forth many times.  A cheaply manufactured book would fall apart.  This book is well-made and can endure the activities of researchers as they peruse both text and notes.  Many of the chapters are written as if they are independent articles; consequently there is much repetition.  But the hefty volume is worth wading through.  Caufield has performed considerable research.  He bested me in searching for members of the New Orleans Council for Peaceful Alternatives, some of whom did encounter Oswald.  He found at least 11 people who linked Oswald with Guy Banister.  Unlike some who portray Jim Garrison as more liberal to make him more acceptable to the Northern Left, Caufield reveals that in Garrison’s first run for the DA post in New Orleans, he spoke before a White Citizens Council gathering, and won the backing of segregationist Judge Leander Perez.  (Despite such, Garrison remains a hero to me.)  Caufield spoke with many people in New Orleans and in Texas.  His description of the FBI informer William Somersett and his most important exposes of proposed assassinations, of Pres. Kennedy, of Rev. M L King, of many on the Left, is fascinating.  Caufield’s description of the riot at Ole Miss is to the point, with 2 dead and many injured, and led by Gen. Edwin Walker.

            Caufield interviewed a Right-winger who claimed that Gen. Walker wanted to stage his own kidnapping in a phony publicity stunt.  Caufield suggests there was a link between Walker and Oswald, and the shooting at Walker’s home was a publicity stunt that occurred just before Walker was to begin a speaking tour.  Caufield also posits that that shooting was as staged as the fight in New Orleans between anti-Castro Cuban Carlos Bringuier and the leafleting, “pro-Castro” Oswald.

            Caufield’s thesis is that Oswald was in reality a man of the Right.  Even as a boy, when skipping school in NYC, one reason for his truancy was there were Negroes in his class.  His favorite TV show was “I Led 3 Lives,” about a man who pretended to be a Communist for the FBI.  Back in NO in the 1950s, Oswald joined the Civil Air Patrol led by the charismatic David Ferrie.  Ferrie, himself, was extreme right-wing.  On Oswald’s 17^th birthday, he joins the Marines.  Caufield discovered a letter in which an official involved in anti-communist activities wrote that he had found someone, no longer in NO, who would be good at infiltrating university left-wing groups.  Caufield contends that Hubert Badeaux was referring to Oswald.(274, 727-29)

            Meanwhile, the threat of communism in the South grew, for to right-wingers, integration was communism.  The 1954 Supreme Court decision overturning over 50 years of precedent that segregation was Constitutional, the integration of Central High in Little Rock with the use of Federal troops (under Gen Walker’s command),  the bus boycott in Montgomery, the sit-ins throughout the South, the Freedom Rides, the integration of Ole Miss (in which Gen. Walker now led an impromptu army to oppose integration), and Pres. Kennedy’s proposing a civil rights bill in 1963 – along with his failure to support the anti-Castro invasion at the Bay of Pigs, his refusal to invade Cuba during the missile crisis, his talk of peace, all showed how communism was advancing in the US.

            Louisiana was inventing a method to halt the flow of communism and integration.  In 1962 Louisiana passed a Communist Control Act, led by Rep. Jim Pfister, but originating with Judge Perez, according to Caufield.  The point was to impose heavy fines and decades in jail for those who associated with Communists or Communist-front organizations.  When Oswald returned to NO in 1963, he sought to infiltrate CORE, the NOCPA, he organized his own FPCC, and all of these organizations had connections with the Southern Conference Educational Fund.  Prove it is communist; show the “communist” Oswald in CORE, NOCPA, and FPCC, and all of those organizations become tainted, and any member can be arrested and face up to 30 years in prison.  In this scenario, Oswald is a fake communist who will be used to destroy the Left, and particularly the integrationist movement in the South.  The man who had lived in the USSR and had a Russian wife, who admitted to being a Marxist, who subscribed to the Worker and the Militant (CP and Trot newspapers) would be used to destroy integration.

            But, another conspiracy was afoot.  Caufield thinks Oswald would continue to pretend to be a communist, but was assured either the shooter would miss, or would not use his rifle, so he need not worry.  Caufield’s chapter on Dallas 22 November is not overly convincing, but should be read for an alternative view.  Much of Caufield’s material prior to 22 Nov. is powerful in a cumulative way.  Not one thing, not one speech, not one action, but together, he makes a strong argument.  Caulfield thinks Oswald was a patsy, he got in over his head, and the President lost his.

            One good thing, Caufield is not politically correct in his use of language.  The racism of speeches given to large audiences is presented without pc euphemisms.  Sometimes it is surprising, as when Gen. Walker tells someone how to add an ingredient to the motor oil that will destroy a car’s motor so the Black owner will be stranded after so many miles.  Or when he describes the office of the voter registrar in Clinton, La., where the official has a black doll with a string to look like a noose – a visual lesson to discourage Black voter applications.

            Caufield has amassed much material to demonstrate how much Pres. Kennedy was hated – not just by 10-year-olds.  Some spoke, on tape, of conspiracy.  After the assassination, Walker was worried that Jack Ruby might leave a Texas hospital alive, and Walker kept his eye (or other surveillance) on Oswald’s mother.  Caufield makes much of Ruby’s request to Chief Justice Earl Warren to be taken out of Texas, but the testimony, in which Ruby does mention Walker, seems rambling, confused, and Warren seems justified to me in denying Ruby’s request.  Even Badeaux’s report that he had found a young man who might infiltrate college left-wing groups might not be referring to Oswald.  Oswald had just quit high school to join the Marines.  Interesting but not always convincing.  But neither the Warren Commission nor various Congressional inquiries have satisfied the American public either.  Caufield gives the public much to ponder.

            Caufield’s research also discovered that many files have been destroyed.  Files of the LUAC, of Guy Banister, of some submitted to the Warren Commission with photos, but some of the photos deleted.  Yet, there may be various reasons for the destruction.  I recall a PBS documentary on the Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission, and their records revealed that a Black minister who went to Ohio during Freedom Summer, supplied information on the integrationists preparing to go to Mississippi.  He provided information to Mississippi segregationist officials about Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman (they were killed in Philadelphia, Miss. during Freedom Summer along with Mississippi native James Chaney.).  The minister was not happy about being exposed as an informer decades after the murders.

            There are some minor errors in this lengthy volume.  Plaquemines Parish (county) is not adjacent to New Orleans (St. Bernard is the neighboring parish to the south)(p. 68)  Caufield writes that Gentilly Parish was outside of New Orleans.(356)  But Gentilly is not a parish at all, it is a section of New Orleans.  SCEF was not the Southern Christian Educational Fund (546) but the Southern Conference…, and it was the Emergency Civil Liberties Committee, not the ECL Union.(547)  Mary Jane Banister was a friend, but we never dated (619, 854); I dated Karol Kloepfer of the NO Quaker family, some of whom were involved with the NOCPA, and Ruth (the mother, Karol, and Ruth Ann (daughter) visited the Oswalds on Magazine St. just prior to their departure for Texas.  When in 1963 Oswald distributed FPCC flyers in front of the old Trade Mart Building, it was not located on Canal St.(746)  US Supreme Court Justice William Brennan was on the high court in the 1960s; there was no Justice Brenner.(766, 946)  One of the Black attorneys who represented CORE in New Orleans was Lolis Elie, not Lelis Ely.(688)

            Coufield writes: “The FBI sent Somersett to New Orleans…Nov. 15-28, 1960 to monitor the Catholic school crisis…”(195)  The crisis that November was the first integration of two elementary public grade schools, in which almost all whites withdrew, angry parents protested the arrival of a few Blacks each day, and the family of a white pupil who defied the boycott was threatened and rocks thrown through their home’s window.  Eventually they had to flee to the North.  The daily protests in favor of segregation made international news.  The Catholic schools at that time remained segregated, and quiet.

            In several places Caufield calls Pres. Kennedy’s proposed civil rights bill of 1963 sweeping and “it would end segregation in the South.”(289, 311)  But Kennedy’s proposals were less sweeping than the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which was passed in 1964 after his assassination, in part out of sympathy evoked by Kennedy’s martyrdom.

            For what comes next, I should add a warning.  I am not here to record my political drift from Left to Right.  Simply put – in Louisiana in the 1950s and 60s by demanding that “we treat people without regard to race, color, or creed,” I was considered a communist by many.  Indeed, that phrase was one of the traditional slogans for civil rights.  Today, when I still demand that we treat people without regard to race, color, or creed, I am deemed a racist, Nazi, etc.  Today, I am a staunch opponent of affirmative action, diversity, and other tools for treating people differently.

`           One of the heroes of Caufield’s book is William Somersett.  In  his home in Miami Somersett tape recorded a conversation with extreme right-winger Joseph Milteer on 9 Nov. 1963.  Caufield deemed the tape so significant he devotes pages to its transcription. (98-105)  On tape Milteer discusses the upcoming visit of Pres. Kennedy to Miami set for 18 Nov. 63.  Somersett interjects, “...he will have a thousand body guards.”  Milteer responds: “The more body guards…,the easier it is to get him…From an office building with a high-powered rifle…Oh, yeah, it’s in the working…disassemble a gun…you don’t have to take a gun up there, you can take it in pieces.”(85-104)  Then there will be a patsy arrested, “just to throw the public off.”(105)  Somersett recorded that for the Miami Police and the FBI.  As a result, Kennedy’s visit of 18 November was altered and his motorcade through the city cancelled.  That tape also included references to the recent bombing of the church in Birmingham and a possible plot to kill Martin Luther King, Jr.  Later Milteer informed Somersett that Louisiana segregationist Judge Leander Perez helped finance the assassination of Pres. Kennedy.(260)  Indeed, several years later Somersett recorded something about the King murder, that would occur soon thereafter.  Clearly, Somersett was a most courageous man to record the words of some very dangerous people.  Somersett is a hero, in the book and out.  He was an FBI informant, amazingly courageous in collecting facts, whether they were used fully by an agency or not.

            There is a contradiction in Caufield’s thought.   When it comes to FBI agents informing on right-winger, KKKers, Nazis, he cheers.  When it comes to those who informed on Communists, Caufield smears.

            Diana West, in her American Betrayal reported that in April 1943, the FBI bugged the home of California Communist leader Steve Nelson when he was visited by a Soviet Embassy official.  The Soviet presented money for the American party, but also wanted Nelson, through power in labor unions, to assign Communists to posts in various new defense facilities – facilities connected to the development of the atomic bomb.  According to West, this was the first that the FBI learned of America’s Manhattan Project – and learned it from a Soviet agent! 

            In many places Caufield criticizes Sen. Joseph McCarthy and his investigations of subversives.  Caufield is critical of the ex-communists who identified old comrades to the FBI, etc.  He is especially critical of the paid witnesses, those who made a living exposing those whom they knew to be or have been members of the CP.

            Finally, on the more difficult issue of Sen. Joseph McCarthy and the exposing of Communists and treason, it is clear that Caufield holds the liberal-left position – “The 1950 Joseph McCarthy Communist witch hunts were front-page news…”(210)  Here Caufield describes former Communist, “paid witness,” Paul Crouch: “Crouch testified before McCarthy’s committee in 1955, that Robert Oppenheimer, director of the Manhattan Project, was a Communist.  Oppenheimer denied…Crouch alleged that he had been at Oppenheimer’s home at a meeting of top drawer Communists.”(708)  Caufield judges that “a blatant lie” on Crouch’s part.  Oppenheimer had conclusive proof that he was in another state on the date of that alleged communist meeting.  Blatant liar!  However, Crouch may have simply had the date wrong.  Oppenheimer’s wife was a member of the CP.  So was his mistress.  So was his brother.  And his sister-in-law.  More recent allegations about Oppenheimer came from a Soviet secret agent.  He maintained Oppenheimer was himself a CP member, though a secret one to avoid problems while he headed the sensitive atomic project.  If you google Oppenheimer on these issues, he apparently was responsible for assigning communists to places like Oak Ridge.  Might he have passed secrets?  Or may he have simply set it up so others could do it?  In January 2012 Russian leader Vladimir Putin thanked Western scientists who provided secret documents on atomic research to hasten Stalin’s acquisition of the bomb.  Putin bragged, “They provided suitcases full; suitcases full!”  Oppenheimer was a secret member of the Communist Party.  Why try to discredit Crouch?  Sen. McCarthy was on the right track.  Caufield and I disagree on this issue.

            Caufield writes that despite the allegations of treason, Alger Hiss was merely convicted of perjury.  But the Venona files, only released to the public in the 1990s, show that Hiss was indeed a Soviet agent.  Indeed, only a small percentage of the Venona files have been deciphered, so there may well have been many more Soviet agents handing over America’s secrets to the Soviets.

            The problem, especially in the South, was that those investigating subversion equated integration with communism.  And communists were indeed some of the most determined to destroy segregation and discrimination.  The communists were determined, showed bravery, knowledge of tactics, and organizing abilities.  Was it a coincidence, or a plot, that Rev. M L King sat beside Communist Abner Berry at the Highlander Folk School?  Remember, when the FBI first wire tapped King on the phone, they were not listening for him, but for Stanley Levison.  The FBI believed Levison, a former communist, was still a secret member, and a leading financial figure in the Party.  They were taping his calls when suddenly they heard him advising Rev. King.

            And it was not only King who had connections to the left and possible members of the CPUSA.  Rosa Parks, so the story goes, the tired seamstress, simply wanted to remain in her seat on the Montgomery bus.  This may well be true.  But before she was arrested for that crime, she had gone to Highlander Folk School for training.  Highlander was a popular-front operation, and anti-racists, including Communists were welcome.

            The main question in the South was not one of espionage and atomic secrets; the question was of a political group set upon destroying segregation.  To some, this translated, destroying the Southern way of life – subversion.  And that is what the integrationists were indeed trying to do.  But did they deserve 30 years in jail for doing so?  Even if they were Communists?

            The NAACP went out of business in Louisiana for a year when it refused to hand over to the state its membership list.  If the Attorney General of Louisiana had that list, he would have gone after any school teachers or public employees and fired them.  That is why the NAACP refused to reveal its membership list.  That is why LUAC and the Eastland Committee wanted the membership list of the SCEF – to punish anyone pressing for integration.

            I would argue that the civil rights movement was a popular front movement, including the religious, radicals, communists, (most liberals in the South preferred not to get involved).  I doubt if many atomic secrets were passed along.  Phones were tapped and mail was opened.  Realistically, compared to what happened to dissidents in other nations, most of us lived to talk about the era.  Unfortunately, President Kennedy did not.  Caufield makes a  case that the assassins shot from the right.