ON ISLAMIC TERROR IN LONDON

      Those who assert that we do not need walls, we need bridges, must understand that Islamic terrorists can more readily kill on bridges.  Just look at the other night's terrorism on London Bridge.
      London's Mayor Khan is upset by Pres. Trump's tweet which criticized the Mayor for urging Londoners not to be alarmed.  Khan was sufficiently disgusted with Trump, so the Mayor declared that if the American President traveled to the UK capital he would not receive the red-carpet treatment.  I suspect the real reason is that that carpet is still wet with the blood of the victims of Islamic terrorists.  Khan refuses to call them such; Trump calls a spade a spade.
     Hugh Murray

ISLAMIC TERROR, THE EXTREME UNCTION OF RADICAL ISLAM

    Some have contended that we should  not use the phrase "Islamic terrorists" to describe many of the terrorists.  Even those who hijacked airliners to crash them into the Pentagon and World Trade Center twin towers, some say, were not good Muslims - they drank alcohol before their mission; they may have indulged with female prostitutes.  The Tsarnaev brothers, before bombing the Boston Marathon, may have killed a Jewish man in a drug deal.  Some maintain Omar Mateen not only drank alcohol at Pulse night club in Orlando, Florida, but he may have been gay.  And now one reads that the truck driver who rode his huge vehicle into crowds celebrating Bastille Day in Nice, France, killing at least 80, the media declare that he did not attend mosque, he drank, and he had troubles with his wife.  How can we call all these murderers Islamic terrorists?
     Terrorist murder is the "Extreme Unction" of radical Islam.  Terrorist murder wipes away all those previous sins, all those prior faults, so that the Muslim terrorist may enter paradise.  By killing the infidels, the sins, the faults of the past, are wiped away through the Muslim "sacrament," the sacrifice of the lives of infidels for the cause of Islam.