EVEN IF OBAMA IS NOT A MUSLIM, THROUGH HIS ACTION, HE MIGHT AS WELL BE ONE

(9/12/12)  ‘Innocence of Muslims’: The film that may have sparked deadly U.S. Embassy attacks

By Liz Goodwin, Yahoo! News | The Lookout – 3 hrs ago

Hugh Murray  •  1 hr 15 mins ago

    Remember some of the films that played major theaters, comedies about the Bible, making fun of orthodox Christian beliefs. Even "Inherit the Wind" about the Scopes trial in Tennessee, mocked and exposed some of the beliefs of fundamentalist Christians. Or the film that showed Jesus deciding to live on with a wife "The Last Temptation of Christ"! How many people did the Christians kill to show their outrage at these films? Many were not happy about these films; but in the US we have free speech, even of speech many do not like.
   That is not the position of most Muslims. Or even lately of the UN and the Euro courts. Kill the filmmaker Van Gogh! Kill the Dutch politician a few years ago. Threaten to kill the Dutchman Wilders.  Destroy Danish products after a Dutch paper published a cartoon the fanatical Muslims disliked (and it appears many Muslims are fanatical Muslims, perhaps a large majority).  Islam is fanatical.
    The big problem: Obama and Hillary supported the Arab Spring and the Muslim Brotherhood. Even at the beginning, when Lara Lang was physically and sexually attacked in the Cairo square of cheering Muslim fanatics, one should have suspected all was not well with the "revolution." Then the verbal demands to exterminate Israel and Jews. Then the attacks on the Coptic Christians in Egypt - burning churches, killing Christians, even crucifying some. AND OBAMA WANTS TO GIVE MORE AID TO EGYPT!
    Even if Obama is not a Muslim, he might as well be one. He apologizes for free speech in the West. He supports the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt with billions of dollars. He does not link 9/11/2001 to 9/11/2012 with attacks on 2 American embassies/consulates. Obama and Hillary should be impeached by the American voters in November 2012.

Terror in Norway - Anders Breivart

This   is composed of two comments I had in the New York Times on line in response to articles concerning the terrorist action in Norway.----------Hugh Murray 

Opinion

Breivik and His EnablersBack to Article »

By ROGER COHEN

Anti-immigrant Islamophobia is an ideology rampant on both sides of the Atlantic.

48.
48.

Hugh Murray

Milwaukee

July 26th, 2011

10:56 am

If I were to compare the Bible to Hitler's Mein Kampf, I would be dismissed as a nut, and it would end there. In the Netherlands, Wilders was prosecuted for comparing the Koran to Mein Kampf. Are Westerners allowed to express freedom of speech if it offends militant Muslims? That is the question. Recall how men were threatened, nearly killed, and bombs thrown when newspapers dared publish a cartoon about Muhammad? Remember how Rushdie had to live in hiding because of the Muslim threats to kill him. Simply put, many Muslims (perhaps the majority in Europe) do not believe in free speech. And they are willing to use violence or support violence to prevent free speech.
In Britain, and the US, some cases seemed so unusual, baffling. Then the pattern appeared - parents and relatives were killing their daughters who might date a non-Muslim, or wear Western clothing. Honor killings now occur where Muslim immigration exists, in the US and Europe.
In the UK, some beds in NHS hospitals have to face Mecca. Some of the nurses now will not clean their arms because they must keep them covered. Who cares if more disease is spread. We dare not annoy the Muslims!
NY just had a marriage debate. How many wives should a man be allowed at one time. The Koran has an answer. Will Euro-America give welfare for all the wives of a Muslim man?
Several decades ago in Egypt women could wear mini skirts and Western clothing. As resurgent Islam insulted more and more women, sometimes attacking them, they dressed "more modestly." And the Arab Spring, recall the case of CBS correspondent Lara Logan, assaulted and nearly killed while the cheering, tolerant crowd, celebrating the demise of Mubarak's rule, shouted "Kill the Jew; kill the Israeli." Did it matter that she was neither - she was dressed immodestly.
Even in Australia, some Muslim's have raped women in bikinis, because they do not dress modestly.
I certainly do not say that all Muslims are so warped,but...

Wednesday, July 27, 2011

READERS' COMMENTS

Shift in Europe Seen in Debate on ImmigrantsBack to Article »

By NICHOLAS KULISH

Political leaders fear such tragedies could drive changes in public opinion as far-right parties react.

Share your thoughts.

102.

Hugh Murray

Milwaukee

July 27th, 2011

10:12 pm

Sadly, sometimes terror pushes voters to choose the policy of the terrorists. Recall, around 2002, the Islamic attack in Spain that led to the fall of the Conservative government, which had supported the war in Iraq. After the subway bombing in Madrid, the Socialist won power and withdrew Spain's support for the US-led effort.
One does not know the consequences of the Norwegian's terrorist attack. One can only hope that there is no large sympathy vote for the Labor Party, which has so supported the oppressive policies of massive immigration and multiculturalism.
The leaders of Germany, France, and Britain all acknowledge multiculturalism's failure. Yet they are only partially correct.
After the uprising in Berlin in 1953, Bertolt Brecht wrote a stinging poem indicting the leadership of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany). He suggested they hold a plebiscite and elect a new people. That is precisely what the Left parties have been doing in Europe - they have encouraged massive immigration to reduce the influence of the native citizens, and win the votes of those who have no history with the nation, with Western Civilization, or with democracy. The trend has thus been to a politically correct tyranny.
And the US goes further providing affirmative action preferences to discriminate against native citizens and award the immigrants, even the illegal immigrants.
One can only hope that the parties of the Right can prevent any more immigration as a method to elect a new people.