THE REAL ISSUE WE FACE IN THIS ELECTION 2024

 Jay Stanley on an American Civil Liberties Union web site, began an article, probably written in 2017, this way -

"President-elect Donald Trump’s criticism of the intelligence community over its reports of Russian hacking during the 2016 election has generated a lot of commentary over what is being described as a “feud” between Trump and the intelligence agencies.

"Beyond all of the questions about the Russians, their relationship with Trump, their role in the election, etc., there is another element of this story that is also raising very frightening questions about the state of our democracy.

""An example of what I’m talking about emerged when Senate Democratic leader Charles Schumer was asked by Rachel Maddow about Trump’s spurning of the agencies’ findings. Trump is “taking these shots, this antagonism, this taunting to the intelligence community,” Maddow pointed out. The response by Schumer—who has been in Congress since 1980, and in the Senate leadership for ten years, and presumably knows his way around Washington—should send a chill through the heart of every American:

Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.

"Some may argue that Trump is not serving his country well by not giving more respect to the intelligence community. But whether or not that is true, if it’s really the case that dissing the intelligence community might result in retaliation by that community against a politician, then the lines of power in our political system have become dangerously distorted."

   It turns out, the American  intel operatives were active in getting the fake Russian collusion story into a FISA court, and soon a Special Council was appointed, one that kept the newly elected Trump Administration on the defensive for its first 2 years in office, though with Speaker of the House  Republican Paul Ryan - a hate Trumper, the new Administration would have had difficulty enacting its programs anyway. 

Skip to October 2020, shortly before election day .

When the NY Post began its expose of the Hunter Biden laptop, Blinken, then working for the Dems, called some intel friends, and soon 51 US Intel agents signed a LIE TO HELP BIDEN WIN AND TRUMP LOSE THE 2020 ELECTION. These included the head of the CIA, and other leaders from other intel agencies. They had not examined the laptop, but assured the American public that it was Russian disinformation; worse, the intel agents got big tech to squash the story before the Nov. 2020 election. When Hunter finally when to trial some years later, NO ONE QUESTIONED THE VALIDITY OF THE LAPTOP. Let me emphasize, just before election day 2020, the NY Post published a story on parts of the Hunter laptop, that exposed both the corruption of Hunter, and presumably his father Joe Biden, the man then running for President against Trump.  Blinken, who was then working for the Democratic Party, asked friends in Intel for help.  Without examining the Hunter laptop, they LIED, say it was Russian disinformation, and they pressured the tech stories to censure and ban the story.  51 leaders in American intelligence organizations, including the chief of the CIA, LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN ORDER TO ELECT DEMOCRAT BIDEN AND DEFEAT TRUMP!  American Intel purposely denied the American voters vital information that could have swayed the election in favor of Trump.  Is this what the Democrats call democracy???  Are our intelligence agencies active in the election contest of today?  This election campaign, there have been at least 2 assassins trying to kill Trump. Did they get help from American intel agencies?  The agencies do not have to use one of their own for such a job.  In the US there are crazies of all beliefs, some on the left, on the right, up or down.  The agencies can just let the protection down and let a crazy get through, to shoot and kill.  Is this what happened in Butler, PA? Time to open up the assassination files on Pres. John Kennedy. Pompeo, former head of the CIA, pled with Trump not to do so, for it would be a catastrophe, Pompeo said.  Trump caved and failed on his promise; Trump did not open all the files. Time to curb govt agencies that have ceased to represent the American people and instead have become the KGB of the Democratic Party.  THE ISSUE TODAY IS, WHO RULES AMERICA?  THE CITIZENS OR THE UNELECTED INTEL AGENCIES?????

Kamala gave her speech in Washington saying Trump wants to be a dictator and jail his opponents, meanwhile Trump is facing around 700 years in prison with all the Dem. charges against him, while some of his advisors like Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon have recently been released from prison while Democrats who faced similar charges never went to jail.  Former Mayor of NYC Giuliani faces pauperism thanks to more political trials.  The Democrats call Trump a new Hitler and racist.  But the Democrats are the party of racism in America.  The Democrats were the party of slavery, of the Confederacy, of the Ku Klux Klan, of the "Solid South" (make sure there are no Republicans allowed to take office), the party of segregation.  Eventually, the old message failed, but unlike the Republicans who demanded equal rights, the Democrats remained the racist party, THEY SIMPLY CHANGED RACES.  To give them more power, they got to determining who was one of the favored races, what percent of advantage they would have, and all other kinds of rewards and punishments, and throw in sex, and trans, and other categories into the pot, and the Democrats, weighing each and how much they should get, becomes ever more powerful, and with INTEL friends, do they really need the votes of deplorables, and what Pres. Biden just called (white trash) "garbage" anymore?  The Democrats have Intel, the media, Hollywood, academia, and now, the military-industrial complex, and it's favored races, ethnicities, sexes, and millions of invading illegal aliens, etc.  It no longer needs the votes of American citizens to win.  Or does it?

     If Trump wins, and/or if he is allowed to win, it will be a whole new ball game!!!

 

HOW DEMOCRATIC IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

    HOW DEMOCRATIC IS THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY?

                            by Hugh Murray

    Recall the political party primaries of 2020. About 13 Democratic candidates debated on the stage, so many, that they had only a few answers to make an impression on the national tv audience. Most were in the mainstream Democratic party general positions, though one, a Congresswoman from Hawaii, Tulsi Gabbard, seemed much more conservative than the rest. Former California Atty. General went after former Vice President Joe Biden, calling him a racist for his earlier comments when school integration was to come to Delaware. Biden, former VP under Democratic President Obama, was generally a known figure to most of America, having served 8 years nationally, and for many years prior as a Senator from Delaware.

    The first of the contests was the primaries was the iowa caucuses. The system is complex, but the early returns showed Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont first, Pete Buttigieg, Mayor of West Bend, IN, 2^nd, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren 3^rd, and former VP Joe Biden 4^th, followed by Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar, and wealthy business man Andrew Yang. Though the voting was on 3 February, and an “official” result was finally announced on 19 February with the Nuttigieg and Sanders forces disputing the new count giving the Mayor first place. The electoral dispute did not conclude then, but continued into the Democratic convention that summer. I wonder if they are still recounting the 2020 Democratic caucus votes. Yet, the Democrats maintain the if you dare question the election results of November 2020, you might have your license to practice law revoked as was former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

I quote now from the Wikipedia discussion of the Democratic primaries: “

“ The first primary was marred by controversy, as technical issues with vote reporting resulted in a three-day delay in vote counting in the Iowa caucus, as well as subsequent recounts. The certified results of the caucus eventually showed Mayor Pete Buttigieg winning the most delegates, while Senator Bernie Sanders won the popular vote in the state. Sanders then won the New Hampshire primary in a narrow victory over Buttigieg before handily winning the Nevada caucus, solidifying Sanders' status as the front-runner for the nomination.[4][5]

Biden, whose campaign fortunes had suffered from losses in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada, made a comeback by overwhelmingly winning the South Carolina primary, motivated by strong support from African American voters, an endorsement from South Carolina U.S. Representative Jim Clyburn, as well as Democratic establishment concerns about nominating Sanders.[6] After Biden won South Carolina, and one day before the Super Tuesday primaries, several candidates dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden in what was viewed as a consolidation of the party's moderate wing. Prior to the announcement, polling saw Sanders leading with a plurality in most Super Tuesday states.[7] Biden then won 10 out of 15 contests on Super Tuesday, beating back challenges from Sanders, Warren, and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, solidifying his lead.[7]”

        My point – the real leaders of the Democratic Party did not like the early results of the primaries. Sanders and Warren were considered too radical. Buttigieg was gay, and would have trouble with many voters choosing a President. Kolbuchar's personality was not friendly. Voters would not choose wealthy Yang or Bloomberg. I suspect after Biden's poor showing in the earlier primaries, the real Democrat leaders conferred with SC Representative Clyburn urging a big get-out-the-vote effort for Biden in that state's primary. Even so, Biden received only 49%, Sanders 20%, wealthy businessman Tom Steyer 11%, Buttigieg 8%, and Warren 7%. This was the first primary with a significan black vote, and it went for Biden. I suspect that at this point the Democratic donors and power types (former Pres. Obama or his representative, and some others got together before Super Tuesday, telling most to get out of the way of a Biden victory. The day before Super Tuesday Buttigieg and Kolbuchar withdrew, and donor funds were undoubtedly drying up too. No more debates of 13 or more candidates. I would be between Biden and Sanders mainly. And Biden with the “moderate” message won. The Democratic primary voters followed the will of their behind the scenes leaders, and voted for Biden delegates on Super Tuesday and beyond. By the opening of the Democratic convention, Biden had won 19 million Democratic votes, Sanders 9.7, and Warren 2.8. Biden was the choice of the Democrats, but ONLY AFTER the behind the scene leaders had decided to pick Biden. The other candidates suddenly found no more wind behind their sails and no more money in their coffers.  They chose to bow out of the race for President.  Because the bosses had chosen Biden first.

    In the modern world we think that the era of Boss Tweed, or the big shots in the smoke-filled rooms making all the important political decisions is over.  Well, the rooms may no longer be smoke-filled.  Or if so, with a different kind of smoke.  Or it may be a zoom "room."  Possible players in these decisions, former Speaker Pelosi, the Obamas, the Clintons, Senate leader Schumer, Clyburn, and now Dem. House leader Jeffries.  And a few billionaires.  They are the ones who make the big decisions, Biden in 2020, should we replace him in 2024, if so, with whom?  They make the decisions.  They are the Party Bosses.  We simply ratify their decisions, or not.

    Now in June/July 2024 the behind the scenes leaders of the Democrats may be deciding they no longer need or want Biden. The NY Times questioning his mental ability; the strange early scheduling of a debate with Trump in June (suspecting Biden would do what he did), and now further calls for Biden to go. Is it the people who decide this? How democratic is the Democratic Party??? We shall find out as the campaign unfolds.  I suspect the attitude of the power-brokers of the Democratic Party is simply this:  We put Biden on the ticket in 2020, and we can take him out in 2024, and anyone else who stands in the way.

IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THE FASCIST PARTY IN THE USA?

 A few days ago Pres. Biden accused a large portion of the Republicans, the Trump supporters, the Make America Great Again group, of being semi-fascists.  Biden is wrong;  He lies.

It is the Democrats who are the real fascists.  The strongest element in the Axis alliance was Nazi Germany.  In Nazi Germany, the leading variant of fascism, all your rights and privileges, or lack thereof, depended on your race, ethnicity, sex, gender.  Top of the heap were straight, Aryan males; bottom, Jews.  Beginning in early 1933, Jews in Germany slowly lost rights, were singled out for discrimination, lost their citizenship, the right to work in media, publishing, theater, etc.  Eventually, the aim was to exterminate the Jewish race, and the Nazis killed about 6 million.  Also low on the racial totem pole, Negerkinder, the children of French black occupying troops and German women during the 1920s.  They were sterilized, faced discrimination, and had general problems.  Japanese were deemed honorary Aryans, and provided the rights of Aryans residing in the Reich.  Poles and other Slavs, down notches, and in conquered Poland, their leaders had already been murdered by Soviet occupiers, but there Poles were to serve the Germans.  Some young Poles who looked sufficiently healthy and Aryan might be taken as children of Germans.  With the rise of Anti-Semitism in the 1930s, Persia, which had been Persia for thousands of years, changed its name to Iran.  It's people were not Semites!  But in time, after promoting Jewish emigration from the Reich to "Palestine," the Nazis found new Jew-haters among the Arab Semites.  During WWII, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem broadcast from Radio Berlin urging listeners in the Middle East to kill the Jews there.  He even visited a concentration camp and approved of its work.  The Irakis had a coup, overthrew the British, indulged in a kill-the-Jews pogrom, and established a pro-Axis regime, until it was quickly overthrown.  When Rommel's army threatened to invade Egypt during the war, the Muslim Brotherhood prepared to join the Germans and destrou that nation's ancient Jewish population.  (Wasn't the Muslim Brotherhood brotherly with Obama?)  Though one method to discover secret Jews in Europe was for men to drop their pants, that method did not work in Muslim areas of what had been Yugoslavia.  The Wehrmacht recruited many of these Muslims, who wore a fez as part of their uniform.

    In America today, we follow the same Nazi policies of granting rights, or denying them, based on your race, sex, ethnicity, gender.  The Democrats are the main proponents, but rich, liberal Republican usually favor these policies too.  In theory, it is to destroy white privilege.  What a lie!  Elizabeth Warren would never have been a law professor at Harvard if she had been a white man.  Or as a white woman.  So Ms. Warren became an Amerindian, a "Native America."  Zingo, suddenly she was qualified to teach at Harvard.  But as a mere "native American" citizen, her application would go to the trash.  She KNOWS white privilege is a lie.  Her actions demonstrate that she knows it.  Yet, Sen. Warren supports Affirmative Action, which is discrimination against whites, males, etc.  It is hiring and promotion by quota, NOT by merit.  It is a major cause of America's decline.  It is a curse on the land.

     Warren chose her "race," to get ahead, to avoid anti-white govt. discrimination.  There are incidents when govt. officials will choose the box for you, perhaps not the one you want.  Or the value of the box can change.  Initially, Asians were among the favored groups, getting extra credit here or there, extra promotions, just because they were Asian.  But in recent years, many Asians are no longer pets of the Democrats.  They are seen as bad as whites, and now they are officially discriminated against by Harvard, by govt., and the Democrat cities allow black thugs (their unofficial Storm Troopers) to beat and kill Asians at will.

    Under the Democrats, Civil Rights have become the opposite, special privileges for the pets of the Democrats, discrimination and punishment for whites, now north Asians, and who next?  The Democrats have abandond the notion of Equal Rights, and they denounce that very idea; They have replaced it with Equity - preferences for their pet crowd; no rights for the others.  A new IRS army of 87,000 armed tax collectors aimed, as under Obama's Lois Lerner, to destroy conservatives.

      In Biden's America, all are equal, but some are more equal than others.  Whites, like liberal super rich billionaires Bill Gates or George Soros or the Zuckerbergs, the tech giants, Hollywood, or CEOs, you can pay to play.  Other whites, get otta the way.  The FBI under Obama took Sheryl Atkinson's laptop, cost her her visible job at CBS, and went after other reporters and even their parents.  One FBI agent assured his girl friend that he and his agency would prevent Trump from ever becoming President.  When Trump became President, this cabal in the intelligence agencies would not stop.  One of the first acts of the FBI was to trip up Gen. Flynn, threaten him and his child with bankruptcy, and disrupt the new Administration.  Then the FBI created fake charges of Russian collusion, - years of expensive investigation and media attacks on Trump, that should have dissolved with the Mueller Report.  Then, two impeachments.  And now the FBI raid on Trump's home.  The leadership of the FBI, CIA, and other intel agencies has become a disgrace.

     The Democrats are the party of racism.  They follow the formula of the Nazis.  And in the past few years, the Democrats, and their fascist ideology, show more and more contempt for free speech, freedom af assembly, and freedom in general .  The Democrats are now the party of racism and fascism.!

hugh murray

Democrats Suppress the Vote

The following is my reply to an editorial in the New York Times, 9 October 2011.  Here I have added a few sentences and corrected a few misspellings. --- HM

Opinion

The Myth of Voter FraudBack to Article »

New restrictions on voting are really intended to keep people who vote Democratic from the polls, particularly the young, the poor, the elderly, and minorities.

28.

Hugh Murray

Milwaukee

October 10th, 2011

10:11 am

Even if it were true that there was no voter fraud in the past (and there has been fraud), should we await until there is massive voter fraud to do something? States are correct in requiring IDs now.

I am one of the elderly, and I want my vote to count and not be voided by illegal aliens voting, or others who vote twice.

The Obama Justice Dept. has refused to demand that states remove the dead from the voter roles, as required by law. Perhaps the Chicago politician hopes to win reelection with the graveyard vote.

The editorial assumes that the Democrats want the number of voters to increase. I recall in Wisconsin in 2004 how the states Democratic Party went to court several times to prevent the name of Ralph Nader appearing on the ballot. (Had the Democrats succeeded, they would have effectively disfranchised some 16,000 Nader voters.  The Democrats failed in their plot in Wisconsin, but did prevent Nader from appearing on ballots in several states.)  In the same election, Democratic operatives, including the son of a Democratic Congressperson, slashed tires of vans meant to transport elderly Republicans to the polls. Democrats seek to curb the vote of those who might vote for other parties. And Democrats use unfair tactics to do so.

The Democrats will stop at nothing to win. To prevent fraud, all good citizens should demand voter ID at the polls.