by HUGH MURRAY
Had George
Zimmerman been named Jorje Zapata, no one outside the Orlando, Florida,
area would have ever heard of him or Trayvon Martin. The reason this became national news was
because the media seized the case as a way to illustrate their racial ideology:
racist white men oppress (and even kill) innocent Blacks. The photos of Trayvon initially shown on
television portrayed him as a
14-year-old boy; the phone tapes made by Zimmerman to a dispatcher were edited
by NBC and other Left-wing media to make it appear Zimmerman was a total
racist. And the same Left media
identified Zimmerman as a white man.
There it was – a white racist profiling, shooting, and killing an
innocent Black boy. All the more reason
to expand hate crime laws, gun control laws, affirmative action, and other
remedies to curtail murderous, white racism.
A child
with a hood is not a hoodlum. A
Congressman wore a hood in a speech before the House. Pres. Obama said that if he had a son, he
would look like Trayvon. Al Sharpton and
various Black “civil rights” leaders demanded that Zimmerman be tried. Members of the New Black Panther Party placed
a prize on Zimmerman’s head. Though
initially, authorities found insufficient evidence to charge Zimmerman with a
crime, Left-wing media outrage and pressure from the higher political
Establishment forced the State of Florida to press murder charges against
Zimmerman. The Left won its fight to
have a show trial to educate the American public on the prevalence of white
racism and its murderous consequences.
There were
some facts that did not fit the approved Left-wing story, but the politically
correct media either ignored or dismissed these. First, was Zimmerman white? He is half white. Why identify him as a white except as a means
to denounce “murderous” white racism?
Obama too is half white. Does the
media call the President white?
Zimmerman spoke Spanish. He tutored
young Blacks. He resided in a
neighborhood that had an increasing crime rate, and he wanted to do something
to stop it. He joined a neighborhood
crime watch program. Not just a passive
player, Zimmerman was an active good citizen.
And what
about the innocent Trayvon? The picture
shown on NBC and the Left media was years old.
Trayvon was now considerably taller than Zimmerman. Trayvon had been suspended from school
several times. Indeed, he was staying in
the gated neighborhood because he was then in suspension. It is not easy to be suspended several times
from public schools. (The educrats want
the money for teaching each body present, so they pretend to educate as many
bodies as possible. Mere attendance
masks as learning.) When authorities
checked Trayvon’s backpack and school locker, they found marijuana and jewelry
that may have been stolen (Trayvon failed to account for it). Was the young Trayvon a burglar? The authorities had also discovered what they
believed to be burglary tools among his things.
On social nets there was a photo of Trayvon with gold teeth making a
gang sign. He spoke of getting a
gun. It is also possible, according to
one account, the police had an earlier encounter with Trayvon, but did not charge
him BECAUSE he was a young Black male, and the authorities did not want to
raise the percentage of Black men charged.
Another example of police work by quota, or Black skin privilege! In reqlity, the young Trayvon with a hood was
a hoodlum. He was on the prowl, probably
casing a neighborhood for a robbery.
Zimmerman
saw Trayvon and concluded he looked suspicious.
He followed him. Apparently,
Zimmerman lost sight of the young man. But
Trayvon spotted Zimmerman; jumped on him, atop him, began to beat his head and
punched his nose. Zimmerman retaliated. He shot and killed the aggressor. The attack was over.
But not
really. The attack on the ground was
over, but the attack by the Left media was about to begin. The media pressed the campaign to convict
Zimmerman. The Left media revealed his
address, so those threatening to murder him might find the prey. More recently CNN even revealed Zimmerman’s
social security number. Why?
In the
1920s Jews had been remarkably successful in Germany and much of Europe. When Hitler became Chancellor in 1933, the
Nazis used Jewish success as proof that they had oppressed the non-Jewish,
German majority. Jews were less than 1%
of the population. They were now denounced
as parasites, sucking the blood and money from the German 99% who were hard-working,
or worse, unemployed. While the average
German earned 1 Reichsmark, the average German Jew was earning 3.2 Rms. To the Nazis, it was clear that the wealth
that the Jews had accrued was ill-gotten, undeserved, gained through fraud,
cheating, corruption, to benefit the elite 1% rather than all Germans. The Nazis were determined to change that and
take away the wealth that the Jews had robbed from the German 99%. When the Nazis eventually confiscated the
wealth of the Jews of Germany and Europe, they did not view it as robbery; only
as justice. The Nazis were simply
returning to all real Germans what the 1%, the Jews, had stolen during their
long stay in Germany.
Unfortunately,
the Left in the US has a similar view of the American white man. He has more money than others. He is racist.
He is murderous. And the wealth
he has accumulated has been stolen from the sweat of Black slaves, from the
lands of the Native Americans, and from the territories ripped from Mexico
(Texas, California, etc.). Whatever
wealth the white man has, he does not deserve.
It should be taken from him – in the name of justice.
So, when
the Internal Revenue Service and government tax agents take more and more from
American whites, it is NOT robbery – it is justice. But more, Some Blacks cannot wait for the
slow-machinery of government to redistribute the ill-gotten gains of the whites
to the Black community. Government is too
slow in creating equity. So some young
Blacks do become hoodlums, thieves, burglars, etc. But if they take money or jewelry from
whites, that is not stealing. That is
simply removing from the white man what he has already stolen. It is justice at its finest. It is no longer Robin Hood of Sherwood
Forest, but Crow Hood of Urban America.
Unfortunately,
many whites, and some Hispanics, do not share this view of justice. They dare to want thieves punished! No way, not in the new, Left wing America. Thieves must be excused, understood, and
placed back in the schools or in the workplace as soon as possible. And this is why the death penalty is so unfair. Because the percentage of Black murderers is
much higher than for other races, executing murderers is racist. After all, some of the murderers were simply
exuberant and determined to get back their wealth from whitey. Surely, these young Blacks must be excused too. Youthful exuberance. But still, on the road to justice. (The percentage of white murderers is
probably lower than official stats. For
some time now, the feds categorize Hispanics as victims only; if they are
perpetrators, they are usually classified as white. So if the NFL Patriot Hernandez is convicted
of several murders, he will probably be listed as a white serial killer!)
In the Left
wing ideology, whites who fight back are the real criminals. This is the point of gun control
legislation. It is meant to disarm
law-abiding whites and make them more vulnerable to Black criminals. And those Blacks who have spent time in
correction facilities often have time and access to gyms so they may grow into
very strong individuals, far stronger than the white who has to work all
day. The days of bread and water jails
are long gone. Now, the released
criminal is not a skinny weakling, but a powerful man. One who can easily take the average honest
guy, especially if the thug surprises him.
The equalizer between the thug and the honest man is the gun. Liberals do not want whites to have guns,
because they might use them against criminals, many of whom will be Black. Of course, liberals have crusaded against
store owners of any color who fire
on those who steal from small stores. In
the end, the liberals favor the thieves, the criminals, the murderers, pretending
that they are the real victims! And in
the Left ideology, who are the real criminals?
The law abiding. Especially if
the law-abiding are white. (Of course,
liberals do favor guns for their body guards to protect politicians, Hollywood
stars, etc.)
Zimmerman
was attempting to protect his neighborhood from rising crime, and in doing so
he dared to confront a Black hoodlum.
Once he killed Trayvon, the Left changes its tune on the death
penalty. Off with his head! Get Zimmerman! A price on Zimmerman, dead or alive. If Zimmerman had done nothing, nothing would
have happened to prevent any crime in his area.
The Left wants no defense of a neighborhood. So what if a neighbor is burgled? So what if another is mugged? So what even if Trayvon had stolen or
mugged? So what? Indeed, if Trayvon had killed Zimmerman,
would we have ever heard about the case?
A burglar is simply taking back
what the whites have stolen. Even if
Trayvon were about to commit a crime, he should not have been shot. Outrageous!
Execute Zimmerman. Kill the Jew
Zimmerman. Kill the Jews. Kill the whites.
Obama,
Holder, liberal Democrats, and liberal Republicans want the criminals to
take. They want law-abiding people to
surrender their jewelry, their money, their lives and sacred honor to the many
Trayvons.
For if
robbed, what happens? Call 911. The police come and fill out a report. Basically, goodbye jewelry. Goodbye money. Goodbye whatever. The Left does not want the thief to be
caught. If caught, Mirandize to shut him
up. Get him a defense attorney. Stall.
Make a deal. And the perp will
soon be out on the streets again. The
victim has no real rights in the court rooms.
The victim will pay with a lifetime of horror thoughts, and real loss.
The Left
advice to Americans; the police advice to Americans - is unfortunately the
same. Turn your weapons in to
authorities. Let the Black thief take
what he wants. Do not stand your
ground. Yield. Surrender.
Then move to a “better” area – which in a few years will be just like
the one you fled.
That is the
history of America for the past 50 years under liberals of both parties. The trend has accelerated under Obama, but it
is the same trend. It is a trend that is
destroying America.
No comments:
Post a Comment