Of all the consequences that would result from amnesty, one that hasn’t been discussed enough is the expansion of affirmative action.
Affirmative action takes existing racial grievances, institutionalizes them, and then magnifies them. As Shelby Steele noted, affirmative action encourages “a victim-focused identity in minorities” and fosters “a parasitic diversity industry” [1].
Affirmative action policies will benefit minority immigrants, and minority immigrants will naturally support affirmative action policies. How do we know? Because Hispanics are telling pollsters so....
My comments:
Hugh Murray
Republican Pres. Nixon made affirmative action a national policy. Result - up to 96% of Blacks vote Democrat. Republican Pres. Reagan signed the bill of the 1980s that gave amnesty to about 5 million illegal aliens. Result, fewer Hispanics voted Republican in the following election. If the GOP endorses the new amnesty bill (comp. immigration reform), of the 11 million invaders, probably 10 million will vote Democrat.
The Democrats have long ago given up on the white working class and white middle class. They favor the discrimination against us. But if the GOP votes for this new outrage, it will gain almost no new Hispanic votes. Meanwhile, it will lose many more white voters - and with good reason.
It is time to deport the invaders, and end the discrimination against whites called affirmative action.
7 Major Immigration Myths Debunked: Forbes...
The Huffington Post
|
By Alvaro Vargas Llosa
Posted: 06/01/2013 9:20 am EDT | Updated: 06/02/2013 3:49 pm EDT
02:14 PM on 06/01/2013
Unmentioned in this pro-invader article - when 11 million illegal
aliens receive their amnesty, they will jump to the head of the univ.
admission line, to the head of the scholarship line, to the head of the
employment line, to the head of the promotion line, etc. About 10
million of the illegals will become eligible for AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
preferences, privileges over native-born, law-abiding, American
citizens. Liberals want to give preferences to illegal invaders over
the law-abiding citizens! Deport the invaders - that is the only fair
and moral thing to do. No amnesty; no road to citizenship for the
invaders.
02:48 PM on 06/01/2013
that is both true, and absurd. no sane population would ever allow itself to be subordinated like that, by invaders Schumer: Immigration bill to pass Senate by July 4
By | Associated Press – Sun, Jun 2, 2013...Republican Pres. Nixon made affirmative action US national policy. Did that win the Black vote for the Republicans? Black usually vote 90-97% against the GOP.
Republican Pres. Reagan allowed the amnesty of perhaps 5 million illegal aliens in the 1980s. Did that win the Hispanic vote for Republicans. In the following election, the GOP % of the Hispanic vote DECLINED after the 1980s amnesty.
If Republicans vote for amnesty for the illegal invaders in 2013, they will win few Hispanic voters. They will lose more white voters, like me.
Because of affirmative action, 11 million more will get in line before me and my kind, given privileges in univ. admission, in scholarships, in employment, in promotions, just because of their ethnic heritage. Why give preferences to illegal invaders over native-born, law-abiding American citizens? It is an outrage! The elite give a-a preferences to its pets, and discriminates against the white working class. One expects this from the elite, from the Democrats, Hollywood, Bill Gates, George Soros, et al.
If the GOP votes for amnesty, and preferences, for illegal invaders over American citizens, the GOP will deserve to lose the future.
Supporters of U.S. immigration bill unsettled by Rubio message...
By Caren Bohan | Reuters – Thu, May 30, 2013Hugh Murray • Report Abuse
Immigration Reform to the media means allowing 11 million illegal invaders of this country to receive affirmative action preferences and privileges over native-born American citizens who broke no laws and invaded no other countries. Why should an illegal have a better chance at univ. admission than a citizen born in Texas? A better chance of a scholarship than a citizen born in Minnesota? A better chance at a job than a citizen born in Vermont?One of my comments I cannot find, but I dismissed the importance of an article that stressed how large majorities of Blacks and Hispanics favor affirmative action. The authoress's point was that when polls state the majority of Americans opposed a-a, that is only because of whites, who do oppose it. However, she stressed that Blacks and minorities favor it. My point was, so what? A majority of criminals in jail might strongly favor halving the time to be served. So what? The majority of people deem serving the full sentences better for the good of society. A majority working at McDonalds might want a minimum salary of $100 an hour. So what? McD's would go out of business, and all would then be unemployed.
Real immigration reform means deporting all the illegals found by the census takers. Closing the borders to invasion. Any other "reform" amounts to discrimination against American citizens. The Gang of 8 reform is anti-American!
My point is that a-a is unjust. Even if every CEO in the nation were a white male, that is no reason to discriminate against a poor white guy trying to get a scholarship, or even admission into college. Worse, a-a by definition means not hiring the best qualified, but only a basically qualified (if that) applicant. Standards inevitably decline.
I am happy to see someone else write about immigration and affirmative action and how unjust the talk of immigration reform is.--------Hugh Murray
