Featured Post

WHITE SLAVES IN AFRICA - STOPPED!

THOMAS JEFFERSON AND THE TRIPOLI PIRATES: THE FORGOTTEN WAR THAT CHANGED AMERICAN HISTORY (New York: Sentinel, 2015) by BRIAN KILMEADE ...

Thursday, January 9, 2025

THOUGHTS ON FIRES IN CALIFORNIA

   The old story was that Emperor Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned.  Then others said, that instrument had not yet been inventted, so he was probably playing the lyre.  Nero was a fan of the arts, and did partake in one of the Olympic games, in the chariot race, awarded the prize, even tho he fell off the chariot.  I think they revoked the prize after his death.  But a fire in ancient Rome did not have fire hydrants, and not many helicopters to drop water to quell the fires.  There can be little doubt, modern fire fighters have certain advantages over those of the Neronian era.

THE FIRES THIS TIME!

     Then how to explain the burnings in Los Angeles?  In an October interview on a podcast, candidate Don J. Trump warned that the green policies of the Democrats were endangering the people of California.  Trump stated, that to save some tiny fish, vast sums of precious water were being emptied from California resovoirs and dumped into the Pacific Ocean, depleting the available water in case of emergency.  He criticized the green policies of the climate change crowd, the eco regulators on various commissions to save obscure frogs, etc., who opposed the clearing of the underbrush, and preferred the leaves to be left to turn brown, and dry up and become tinder for any sparks down the road.

   Trump made this criticism, the WARNING, in October 2024.  The past few years, California has experienced almost record breaking rains.  Water, which had accumulated, was diverted and emptied into the ocean, underbrush dried and accumulated to become tinder.  Democrats, greens and progressives, refused to allow controlled burning of the underbrush, which is dangerous, but if you do not burn it off in small chunks, the later result will be huge uncontrolled fires, as we see now in Los Angeles.  Meanwhile, California money for firefighters was cut, and the new leaders spent more on important projects like DEI.  One experienced gent applying for such a job, was denied one BECAUSE he was a white male.  He was told to come back in 7 years once the fire department had hired more of its quota people.  (One wonders if he might have gotten a job immediately if he had said, I am a male today, but used to be female.) Meanwhile, the fire department was undermanned.  And the water hydrants were NOT underwater, but often OUT OF water.

     And when the first sparks came, and smoldered into fires, fires with flames that sparked and spread in high winds to more fires, and more, and more.  Homes burnt, businesses burnt, schools burnt. neighbor hoods burnt.  Los Angeles began to look like bombed out burnt out Dresden at the end of WWII.  These fires in California may have begun as accidents, but the failure to control them was the result of policies, Democratic Party policies, ecology policies, Green policies, progressive policies.  Cal. Democrat Gov. Newsom fiddles while California burns; Pres. Biden fiddles while America burns.

     We need Pres. Trump now more than ever.        Hugh Murray

Thursday, January 2, 2025

THOUGHTS ON PARADES

  Feb. 21, 2021 a man drove his large car, and SUV, into the back of a Christmas parade as the groups were walking, dancing a marching down the street.  The driver purposely aimed his van at the people in front of him, running them down, killing some, maiming others.  Results: 6 dead, and 62 injured.  I have friends in Waukesha, and was invited to a big meal a few days later.  I was shocked then to hear that they had planned to go to that parade, but one of the group had a stomach ache, and they stayed home instead.  3 cheers for stomach u[sets.

     Most killed were elderly, particularly a number of a group Dancing Grannies.  (also murdered, a 5-y-o boy).  This was a rare event.  New Orleans has many parades, and a male group invited the Dancing Grannies to march in a NO Mardi Gras parade, which ends in the French Quarter.  The Waukesha grannies paraded in NO several times.

    New Year's Eve 2024-25, there was no official parade in the French Quarter, just the mass of people there to drink and celebrate the coming New Year.  It was well after midnight, after 3am, the crowd had thinned, tho their speech may have thickened after many drinks.  Then the maniacal driver seeks to mow them down with his vehicle, his rifle, and his explosives.  His objective is to separate believers from non-believers.  I only hope there are not many believers like him!  He killed 15, wounded 30+.

     What is strange is that this method of terrorism is still rather rare in America.  I was born and raised in New Orleans, lived there until about 30, and now reside in the city of which Waukesha is the suburb.  One hopes the terrorists will stop this - people are not grass to be mowed and slaughtered.  I hope NO can return to Mardi Gras parades, jazz funeral parades, engagement parades, and just parades for fun, and Waukesha can have happy Christmas parades hereafter.---Hugh Murray

Friday, December 20, 2024

A TULANE U. MURDER CASE

         by Hugh Murray

I was a freshman at TU in Sept. 1956, and took a US History class with Mr. Soule in the old barracks on Freret across from the Bursar's Office. About 80 of us jammed in the class room, built I think in WWII, and since demolished. Soule was a tough grader, only 4 of us got A's the first term. One, Tom Cramer was a member of the Unitarian Church, as was I, and he had a friend from Central America, Al Calvo. Tom, a handsome blond from Texas would run for class president, against Steve Andry?(sp) a local commuter student, as was I. Tom was in the Beta frat, but I was GDI(God damned independent), and Al was non-committal. We were not close, but they were really among the few dorm students whom I knew. I drove them around the city a little, and we went swimming in the pool in City Park – it was supposed to be closed the following year to be converted into a pool for seals to avoid racial integration (and I do not mean Navy seals).

 In May 1957 we had our final exam with Mr. Soule; I had finished early and was chatting with another student on the tiny porch of the barracks when a 3rd early finisher came out the door. He said he had just gone to see Mr. Soule in his office, but FBI agents were interviewing him. My demeanor changed, as I suspected what that was about. For the draft, I had registered as a conscientious objector, and the FBI was then investigating me. In those years, one was generally exempt for the 4 years of undergraduate school if you maintained a B average, so it was unlikely I'd be drafted for some time. Eventually I withdrew that CO registration after graduation. 

 In Sept, 1957 when fall term resumed, I received a phone call from Calvo, who had just returned to NO. He had spent part of the summer at Cramer's home in Belle Aire, a well off suburb of Houston. I was surprised and pleased by the call from Calvo. "What's up?" "I don't want to say on the phone." With those words, I knew, the FBI had been to Texas to speak with him and Tom. We saw each other for a short uneasy meeting. By then I had a policy, if they wanted to continue friendships, they would call again. I was not going to bug them and beg them. Neither Al nor Tom called me again, and I heard Al had joined the Pike (Pi Kappa Alpha) frat.

 I t was probably Monday, Sept. 29, 1958, when walking on campus I saw Calvo. Had not seen him in a year. Perhaps, I was wrong to break off a friendship when he had been kind to tell me about his Houston visitors. I decided to be super friendly as we walked. Where are you going? To my dorm. I'll go with you and catch up. I was bubly, happy to see him. He seemed distant. I kept the conversation going for about 2 blocks. He was in Zemurray or one of the dorms. We get there, and almost immediately, a frat boy who lived across, their shared bathroom, entered. Al went to him. And they held a whispered conversation in the corner. I found that rude, and could hear nothing. Then Al looked at me and said, "Would you mind leaving?" I was shocked. Well, I had tried to renew a friendship, and failed. I left. 

 A day or 2 later, all over the newspapers, 3 Tulanians were arrested on murder charges. In the dorm room, they were discussing how to dispose of the dead man's wallet. The 3 frat boys had gone to the French Quarter to “roll a queer.” One, John Farrell, had entered a gay bar, Lafitte's in Exile, and chatted up Fernando Rios, a 26-year-old tour guide from Mexico. (The daughter of an owner of that bar, had been a member of the Unitarian youth group with me for a time. She was straight and married a young man and left our group for her family.) Al and another Pike, David Drennan, waited outside that bar. Farrell guided Rios to a narrow alley between the Cabildo and St. Louis Cathedral. The other two threw a few punches against Rios, but Calvo, with powerful arms, really bashed the Mexican's face and head. Calvo also took his Wallet. When they returned to Tulane, leaving Rios lying in the alley, Calvo went to some student friends boasting that he had rolled a queer, while waving the man's wallet.

 Next day, Rios died in hospital. Tulane's Dean Stibbs and others urged the 3 to turn themselves in. Dist. Atty. Richard Dowling (the same who had come in person to Woolworth's to read us the law before arresting us in the city's first lunch-counter sit-in, soon charged the 3 with murder. Many seemed to dislike that decision, afterall, it was alleged Rios made a play for Fearrell, and the 3 were just defending their honor. One doctor reported the victim had an unusually thin skull, so why blame the 3 students for his femenin cranium? The jury took a little over 2 hours to render its verdict, NOT GUILTY. Next day's Times Picayune described the applause and cheering that greeted the decision in the courtroom that 23 January 1959. 

 Though Al had been a friend, I decided not to visit him during his case. I did not want to get involved; and was horrified by what they did. The cheering was not simply in the courtroom. By chance I was walking across the very wide Canal St. on that day. I was perhaps 9 blocks from the Mississippi. Suddenly, behind me from the river, I hear a racket. I turned to see cars exiting the French Quarter (where the courtroom was),and now discerning what they were yelling: “open season on queers,” “kill the queers.” It was an unofficial Tulane motorcade, undoubtedly headed for the university. I never saw Calvo again, and thought he returned to Panama. Others writing about the case state that all three returned to Tulane and finished their education. 

 Sometime during this era, one or 2 Tulanians took a dog to the top of a new multi-story dorm, and dropped the animal. The dog did not die, but had 4 broken legs. The dog was taken to a vet, and lived. The students who did this, were told to leave Tulane, and they did. Hurting and hurling a dog was a greater crime than killing a fruit. (I don't recall faggot ever being used in NO at that time, fruit or queer were the common terms.) And Tulane was one of the more liberal institutions in NO. 

 In 1961 Dowling was up for re-election as NO Dist. Atty. It was still a one-party town, so he had to win the Democratic Party primary. In a 5-man race, Dowling lost by 6,000 to Jim Garrison. Dowling had been criticized for charging 3 upstanding Tulane students with murder. Manslaughter perhaps, but charging murder against 3 fraternity boys for whipping a sexual deviant! Dowling seemed to be too out of touch with reality to be DA again.

Lmust add that Tulane was a liberal institution in NO in that era. 

Saturday, December 14, 2024

SOME SYRIAN DRUZE REQUEST ANNEXATION INTO ISRAEL - RT

 This artoc;e comes from RT, the Russian channel.  It contains surprising content.  If accurate, it will make the Druzes targets for other factions striving for power after the fall of Assad.  On the other hand, some Druzes already live inside Israel.  Hugh Murray

Syrian village asks to be annexed by Israel – media

An alleged member of the Druze community said it would be the “lesser evil,” fearing future jihadist rule after the fall of Bashar Assad
Syrian village asks to be annexed by Israel – media

The southern Syrian village of Hader has reportedly requested to be incorporated in the Israeli-occupied part of the Golan Heights, according to the Times of Israel. The outlet cited an unverified video where a member of the Druze community expressed concerns over the future of his people.

Bashar Assad’s government fell last week after opposition forces, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) jihadists, launched a surprise offensive across Syria and took control of its major cities, including the capital Damascus. The erstwhile president has since resigned and sought asylum with his family in Russia.

In a video posted to X on Friday that features captions in English, a Hader resident claiming to be a representative of the Druze people, an esoteric ethnoreligious group, urged a large crowd to consider what their future will be like. The village is located within the buffer zone between Israel and Syria, which IDF troops entered last week.

“If we have to choose, we will choose the lesser evil,” he said. “And even if it’s considered evil to ask to be annexed to the [Israeli] Golan, it’s a much lesser evil than the evil coming our way,” the man added, apparently referring to the HTS, which was formerly known as the Al Nusra front - an offshoot of Al Qaeda in Syria.

“That evil might take our women, might take our daughters, they might take our houses,” he said, pleading for the Syrian Druze to be freed from the “injustice and oppression” that had been imposed on them in the past, and could be imposed again by Islamist rebel groups.

“We have asked to be annexed to the Golan to preserve our dignity” the man, who claimed to speak on behalf of the Druze community across the surrounding area of Quneitra Governorate, said. “We ask in the name of all the surrounding area to join our people in the Golan, and to live with freedom and dignity like our people are living [in Israel]. 

Around 48% of Syria’s Druze resided in the Suwayda Governorate some 90 kilometers from the border with Israel prior to the civil war, the Times of Israel reported citing a 2010 census. Since then, however, it is believed that many of them have fled the region for safer parts of the country.

Sunday, December 1, 2024

DAVID BROOKS IN ATLANTIC MONTHLY QUESTIONS MERITOCRACY IN UNIVERSITY ADMISSIONS, etc.

 I have only read a short summary of the Brooks article in Newser, but was shocked.  Here is my response as I posted it on Newser.  In some ways my response is a short summary of my forthcoming book.  Hugh Murray

What a crock! Merit was abandoned around 1965 when leaders of the EEOC pushed the unproven theory that all large groups are equally adept in all fields. From this absurd assumption, if all groups were not equally represented in all fields, that proved racial discrimination. This theory was the underlying justification for the trendy phrase, system racism. A few years later, Eleanore Holmes Norton decided anything that interfered with minority hiring should be abolished. So, no more info permitted don previous arrests, etc. when applying for jobs or univ. or whatever. And exams where minorities did poorly were condemned as discriminatory, and she fought to ban them, EVEN WHEN THEY WERE THE BEST PREDICTORS OF HOW APPLICANTS MIGHT DO IN UNIV OR CERTAIN JOBS. By Reagan's time, tests were still given, but graded on racial curbs, to boost scores of minorities and demote those of white men. For decades anti-white male propaganda has spewed from the media, ever more govt. agencies, and universities. DEI is the most recent branding of this anti-white racism. DEI is how a Black woman became Pres. of Harvard who had written not a great deal, and some of which was plagiarized. To the liberals, merit is the enemy. This is why we spenc so much on each pupil in public schools, and they often graduate and have trouble reading, doing math, and some now cannot write their own names.

The author of the donnyBrooks in the Atlantic will see his case sink, even by the torpedoes of many who have already responded to it on the Newser site.

Saturday, November 23, 2024

FORMER HEAD OF CENTER FOR DIESASE CONTROL (CDC) ON US INVOLVEMENT IN DEVELOPING DEADLY COVID VIRUS

 The following comes from RT.  The authoress quotes Dr. Redfield, former head of the US CDC, as he accuses US agencies in helping to create the deadly Covid virus.  -  HM

3 Nov, 2024 21:08

Did the US help create Covid-19? Ex-CDC chief carpet-bombs the official narrative

Dr. Robert Redfield suggests that the virus was engineered in a lab and the US was involved
Did the US help create Covid-19? Ex-CDC chief carpet-bombs the official narrative

Despite various debunkings, the Western establishment is still policing Covid-19 narratives nearly five years later – even when the latest bombshell suggests a US national security coverup.

A former head of the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is being accused of spreading fake news for making statements that fall outside the acceptable Covid-related dogma that the Western establishment deems etched into history as indisputable fact.

Dr. Robert Redfield, the virologist who served as CDC director during President Donald Trump’s first term, said on a recent podcast that the Covid virus was “intentionally engineered as part of a biodefense program,” and that “the US role was substantial,” citing research funded by the “National Institutes of Health, the State Department, USAID, and the Defense Department.” 

He specifically attributed the probable creation of “some of the original viral lines” to a researcher at the University of North Carolina, although conceded that he couldn’t actually prove it. Yeah, well, that’s what hearings with the power to compel evidence and testimony under threat of imprisonment are for – not a podcast. How about getting that researcher on the stand?

“Scientists agree that there is no evidence to suggest that Covid-19 originated in a lab in any country,” Newsweek wrote in reporting on Redfield’s remarks. Actually, there is at least some smoke to suggest a potential fire. In 2021, Newsweek itself contacted Dr. Anthony Fauci, who served as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) during Trump’s first term. Fauci clarified that the research the US “supported in China, where coronaviruses are prevalent, sought to understand the behavior of coronaviruses circulating in bats that have the potential to cause widespread disease. The body of science produced by this research demonstrates that the bat coronavirus sequences published from that work NIH supported were not SARS-CoV-2.”

Fauci added that the US-backed gain of function research wasn’t applied to viruses that could infect humans. Guess it’s just an incredibly wild and unlucky coincidence then that the global epicenter for the outbreak just happened to take place near a lab funded by Washington in China, where they were doing gain of function work on some viruses – just not on the exact virus that happened to cause global mayhem.

And we’re supposed to just take Fauci’s word for it, I guess. We’re talking about the same guy who appeared on TV in a cloth mask covered in the logo of his favorite sports team and told everyone to do the same as though the only thing standing between life and death was a pair of grandma’s pantyhose wrapped around your face. Then he told Americans not to invite unvaccinated family members over for the holidays, despite the fact that it failed to actually prevent transmission or infection.

During the podcast interview, Redfield also reframed China’s responsibility in a way that would likely annoy the Western establishment. “When you look at the accountability for China, their accountability is not in the lab work and in the creation of the virus. Their accountability is not following the international health regulations after they realized they had a problem,” he said, seemingly implying that it was American interests that spearheaded the research project.

Again, why is mainstream America learning about this via some obscure show? This guy even testified at a Covid congressional hearing, but his position was far from audible. “It was told to me that they wanted a single narrative, and that I obviously had a different point of view,” Redfield previously said, according to the BBC. “Science has debate and they squashed any debate,” he added, in a nod to Fauci. The White House has admitted that there isn’t even consensus across the US government on the Covid virus’ origin, yet they seem entirely satisfied with the lack of answers.

Despite the lingering uncertainties, the establishment press is quick to dismiss anyone who doesn’t support the theory that it came from some random bat or other animal that some dude ate in China. The scientific community and the Western establishment gate-keep their Covid-related narratives as consensus, and anyone who dares to deviate is written off as a kook – even if the dissenting view, in this case, is expressed by one of America’s leading health authorities during the Covid fiasco.

This is the same ‘scientific community’ that largely shrugged off the social applications of their ‘science’ when it led to things like surfers wandering along empty beaches alone being chased down and tackled by cops in the interest of public health. It’s the same community that’s equally intolerant of any dissent related to their manmade climate change theory.

Why is debate even remotely controversial when there are still so many unanswered questions? And it’s not like the issue is benign or entirely in the rear-view mirror. Some people are still so traumatized by the tsunami of official government propaganda related to the overwhelmingly survivable (and now largely forgotten) virus that they haven’t stopped regularly running out to top up on their Covid jabs, which have never actually met the time-tested definition of a vaccine.

Recently, some American jurisdictions have even taken action to stop people jonesing for their next injection to treat their state-sponsored psychological trauma a half-decade later. Officials in Texas and Florida have actively blocked jab promotion and marketing campaigns. A regional public health authority in Ohio has recently blocked it from even being available.

Last year, the House Oversight Committee identified a “highly credible” senior CIA officer who told them that the CIA had offered financial incentive to a group of analysts working on the Covid origin question to support the natural transmission theory over the lab leak theory. If CIA involvement can’t be dismissed, then why ignore the possibility of other related national security agencies’ involvement?

Achieving greater transparency on the discreet role of government agencies in the Covid debacle sounds like the perfect job for Trump’s new nominee for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has long suspected the involvement of the CIA in the assassination of his uncle, President John F. Kennedy, citing the former president’s refusal to send troops to Vietnam.

Western governments from the US to France have classified Covid-related information and deliberations. Sounds like it would be a good time to reopen the conversation, starting with the public release of any secret ‘Covid files’ – all in the interest of science, of course.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

AMERICAN COUP; WILIMINGTONTON 1898 -- MY REVIEW

PBS presented a 2-hour history program on the violent overthrow of government in Wilmington, NC. My main complaint is that it takes the Wilmington insurrection out of context; it fails to show that the fall of Negro power in Wilmington was the final chapter of what had been a 33-year long Second Civil War. When Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the US, in late 1860, not even receiving a full 40% of the popular vote, Southern states began to secede. When Louisiana withdrew, and called for volunteers, among them volunteering were the informal militia of the Free People of Color (FPC). The Confederacy did not think that wise, and they were rejected. True, there were black slave owners in the state, one woman an owner of many slaves; but these were the exceptions, and arming blacks might lead to problems in the war.

 Early in the war, the largest city of the Confederacy, New Orleans, fell to the Yanks headed by Farragut, a Southerner, fighting for the Northerners. When local women in the city showed what they thought of the Yankee soldiers by spitting on them and insulting them, Union Gen. Ben Butler ordered that such women were then to be treated as women of ? (whores), an order that caused international outrage in Europe, and Lincoln had to countermand Butler's order. Meanwhile, many of the FPCs now sought to join the Union army, and they did. So some people of Louisiana were now joining the "foreign" occupiers. 

 The American Civil War continued, and tho our population was then much smaller, the casualty rate was higher than those lost in WWI, or WWII, or any war since. By early 1864 many wanted the killing to end, have peace again. The Democrats' party program of 1864 essential promised a 2-state solution; the North would go it alone and free, the South would retain slavery and be independent as the CSA. The Democrats were so popular, that Lincoln dumped his vice-president Hamlin of Maine, and replaced him with a war Democrat from Tennessee, Andrew Johnson. They did not run as Republicans but as the Union ticket. With Yankee victories and the 2nd half of 1864, more voters turned to Lincoln's plan for victory over the rebels, and he won decisively.

 At his inauguration in 1865 Lincoln did not sound vindictive, with charity toward all," and after the band played the national anthem, Lincoln requested that it next play Dixie.  Earlier, Gen. Grant had allowed the defeated Lee's army to keep their side arms in defeat. Shortly after the inauguration, Booth made Johnson President. Lincoln had toyed with letting educated blacks (men) vote, but he had also toyed with sending the large black population to Africa or some islands. 

 By this time thousands of blacks in the North and black slaves in the south had joined the Union Army. (n 1866 in New Orleans a meeting of hundreds mainly blacks to demand the vote. The Mayor, and police, Democrats and pro Confederates, raid the gathering and murder a large number, including Dr. Dotsie, a white, and they shot a German-born newspaper man, Michael Hahn, who survived and would be one of the few Republican elected leaders at war's end.  Elected as governor, the General running New Orleans was transferred, and Hahn was given little power; then elected to the US Senate, with Lincoln's murder, the national Congress refused to seat any elected from the South.  Hahn had a bumpy political career, as would any Republican in the South.  Also in 1866 a massacre of blacks in Memphis. These were well publicized and helped the Radical Republicans win Congress. The Freedmen's Bureau was aiding the freed slaves to adjust.

 White planters had lost their work force and their Confed. money was worthless. 
Think of the trauma for some Southerners - not only had they lost their valuable property in the largest confiscation of private property in American history, but soon after their former property might be wearing the blue uniform of the enemy and aiming a gun at them! A large number of blacks had fought in the army of the Northern enemy. Blacks thought, the white South fought to keep them enslaved. WHAT HAPPENED NEXT? 

     We should understand, not only was the South defeated, not only was there much destruction of property, burnt buildings, stolen cattle, chickens, whatever, but THE ABOLITION OF SLAVERY SIGNALED A SOCIAL REVOLUTION.  Millions of blacks, illiterates (there had been laws forbidding teaching them to read) and everything uncertain.  Thay had lived in slave quarters, but who would now own those dwellings?  Did freedom mean they had to work?  Everything was uncertain.  Of course many whites were illiterate too; and in the north, new immigrants might not even speak English.  But the South was entering unknown terrirory.

     WHAT WOULD HAPPEN NEXT?  A 2nd civil war. So long as Norther troops remained to occupy the South, there was some protection for blacks. But the Johny Reb's were forming new organizations to prevent black rule. Red shirts, knights of the white camellia, the white league, and the ku klux klan, all set to oppose black rule. When Grant was elected President, he pushed for civil rights for blacks, and enforced anti-KKK laws. Yes, there were national civil rights laws passed in the 1860s and 70s.

   But the crunch came in the Presidential election of 1876; Democrat Tilden clearly had a majority of votes, but not Electoral Votes, and the Dems had intimidated blacks in many southern states, including the disputes ones. A DEAL, The Republican would win the White House, but remove the Yankee troops from the south. Soon, Dems are winning big in elections in Louisiana, Mississippi, etc. and black cries of intimidation or lynching go un-noticed.  The cavalry is no longer there.

 By early 1890s, Louisiana had a new voting law that essentially prevented most blacks from registering. And this was happening in other Southern states too. In 1895 the great Atlanta Exposition, at which Booker Washington, leader of Tuskegee Institute in Alabama gave a major speech. In some things, the races can be like the finger, separate and doing separate functions, but on other issues the races can unite in strength as a fist. He basically said blacks should not prioritize politics. That was national news, what whites north and south wanted to hear. End the race problems.  Or rather, end of hearing about them.

 In the 1890s a case had been percolating up from New Orleans to the US Supreme Court, which finally ruled 8-1, that separate and equal facilities were legal in Plessy v. Ferguson; segregation was the law of the land. In 1892 Ida Wells went north and while away her newpaper was destroyed by segregationists, and she was threatened with lynching if she continued. My point, by early 1898 NEARLY ALL of the South had basically succumbed to white supremacy and the Democratic Party, often by intimidation and murder. Aside from 1 or 2 Appalachian areas that had supported the Yanks during the war, there were no Republicans left in the national Congress from the South, they had all been wiped out. All but the one in Wilmington.  But Wilmington should not be studied in isolation, for it was the last battle in the 2nd Civil War.
      Hugh Murray  I wrote this mainly from memory.  Alas, I have not taught history for 55 years.  I'll try to fill in the blanks later.

    This period in history is called the era of Reconstruction, and there was much to be rebuilt after the war's destruction.  But the social revolution promised by Northern victory depended on Yankee soldiers.  True, many locals still had weapons, former Confederate soldiers on one side, former slaves who had joined the Union army might have theirs on the other.  Local police and sheriffs were still Democrats (white supremacists).  Early large-scale massacres caused reaction in the North, determination to punish the South, and passage of anti-KKK laws and pro-black civil rights laws. So an alternative strategy was adopted.  Instead, of mass murders, the South planned to kill Radical Reconstruct with a thousand cuts, a guerilla war, throughout the South, targeting this militant here, another black voter there, a slow 2nd Civil War which engulfed the entire South.  The 2nd Civil War was a guerilla war fought mainly in the South,  The Southern whites generally sought to avoid major killings, for that might rouse the North to intervene.  In the South, it was also mainly a racial war, whites against blacks, while the Northerners residing there were generally intimated either to go North, or change their views.  When the Yanks withdrew the Union troops after the 1876 Compromise, the Southern offence hastened.  Wilmington was the last major battle of that war.  No more blacks in Congress from the South until the 1960s.  The "solid South" was solidly Democratic, and solidly white supremacist.

     For a modern analogy, after WWII there were 2 reconstructions in Germany, one conservative, one radical.  The radical one, in the east, the German Democratic Republic, sought to build a "socialist" society.  But how long would it last without Soviet troops?  1876 and 1990 provide somewhat similar answers.

     Back to the tv program: it is like a Shakespearean play in which the director cut Act I, cut Act II, cut Act III, etc. and only the final act was staged.  That is not good enough.