MORE ON THE INSURRECTIONS AGAINST ICE

This began as a letter to a friend, slightly modified for the blog.

  Here is my response to both of your emails.  When I first saw a video, I thought it looked as if the ICE man shot her after she passed him in the auto.  But lots of people have their cameras to their faces, taking videos.  I suspect more will become available.  But where was the shooter?  Seems he was not visible to me, as her car blocked the view.  The woman had returned to her car, and a cop was at her car door asking her to get out.  She did not.  Her car was blocking both lanes of traffic as she had parked perpendicularly, to block traffic?  And the ICE mission?  I only saw the shooter after she turned onto the traffic lane and was shot.  I did not see her car hit him.  I was told by right wing tv that the first shot hit her windshield from the front, so she was driving toward him, at least for a short time.  Then more shots and car stops.

    She claimed to be a legal observer.  I doubt if any court had given her any special privilege or position.  If one of the protest groups had given her that title, well, it would be coming from a biased group.  Liberal orgs. such as the American Civil Liberties Union try to play to the media that they are impartial, but they are a liberal organization, tho historically they have on occasions defended conservatives.  As she Mrs. Good was trained by an organization whose purpose is to disrupt any attempts to deport illegal aliens, I would  not call her impartial.

    In August 1960 I spent 3 weeks at a training institute in Miami, sponsored by CORE, the Congress of Racial Equality; one day a teacher was Jackie Robinson, first black allowed to play in Major League Baseball; another teacher, M L King.  About 40 of us from throughout the nation, 6 from New Orleans as they were hoping to make a break-through there.   Politically, most of os were mainly on the left, tho Robinson openly supported Nixon in the 1960 presidential election v JFK.  The emphasis, how to protest USING NON-VIOLENT methods.  They supplied us with a book on Gandhi, and a short one of Hindu scriptures.  We had to unlearn natural responses, basically, not to defend ourselves.

   Renee Good attended a left-wing training camp too, on how to obstruct ICE.  I suspect this is Antifa in a new uniform.  As is, ICE members are harassed going to work; their home addresses and phone #s distributed to all who can phone and insult  them, physical attacks on these law-enforcement officers continue to rise.  The ICE man who shot her had to have numerous stitches as he had been dragged 35 feet or 350 feed over the street in trying to apprehend an illegal.  The left-wing is willing to use force to get its way.  The training camps to destroy our law enforcers amounts to a revolutionary training camp.  Mrs. Good was probably trained in insurrection.  Indeed, the many protests now occurring - against enforcing the law - these are insurrections.

    America has immigration laws.  Many enter and depart legally.  But under Biden, and with the support of the Dems, and some Republicans who hope to hire cheap foreign laborers, Biden ignored American immigration laws, and encouraged perhaps 2 million illegals to come into the nation.  Trump is trying to deport most of them.  Here illegally, they should have no rights, but Fed Judges find new excuses to keep them here.  The Left wants them here to supplement the Dem vote (as our voting rolls, in theory just for citizens, now have unknown numbers of illegals voting.)  If Trump fails on this, if the Dems return to control Congress in 2026, he will be impeached again (but not convicted) and the Dems will make sure no more deportations occur, and make 20 languages the official language of the nation.  America will cease to be a nation, but a hodgepodge.  Globalists will be happy, as they generally opposed nation states anyway.  The CIA and the Dems (and a few Republicans favor globalism over nation states.  One major reason I voted for Trump was he opposes the globalists.  The nation states allow development of different paths to what we hope will be a better life.  Different experiments.  I think that better than the one-path globalists.      All the best,   Hugh Murray

ON THE "GOOD" WOMAN OF MINNESOTA

 She and many others have been training to obstruct the enforcement of American laws. They favor the invaders over Americans. Traitor Joe Biden aided and abeted the massive foreign invasion of this country as Dems felt they could no longer count on the votes of American citizens. That is why the Dems want illegal aliens on the voter rolls, along with the dead, and other names to help steal the count.

The main point, those who entered this nation illegally are invaders, and are not supposed to get any govt handouts, should not be enrolled in public schools or universities, and should not be allowed to take away jobs from struggling American citizens. The "good" woman was there to prevent the law from being enforced. Her training led her to make foolish decisions, for which she paid dearly.

Ice should not back down.  Their job is a large one because Biden open flood gates to massive numbers of people from all over the world with little or no vetting.  In Minnesota, the recent scandal of pre-school services, with millions of dollars stolen, is probably one tip of 50 icebergs in other states.

The anti-ICE training camps are in effect camps for training revolutionaries.  America does not need a revolution.  On the contrary, we simply need enforcement of laws already on the books.

-----------HUGH MURRAY

-

FROM GRADE SCHOOL DECLENSIONS TO THE FAMILY MADURO

 I forget many of the grammar rules, but recall some.  For instance, the verb 
"go."  It went, I go, you go, he/she/it goes.  For plural: we go, you all go (or familiar) y'all go, they go.  In the USA, there was a contrast in this between the North and South, for the Yankees (Northerners) had no plural of you, which led to confusion in conversations.  In the South< "you all" meant more than one was invited to a party, etc.

Now let's look at a family name.  The leader of Venezuela until today was Nicolas Maduro.  But American forces arrested him and his wife, and they are now facing criminal charges in American courts.  So their name might decline from Maduro to Saduro.  If convicted and imprisoned, their name might again decline and change to Enduro.

And what future?  Here is one possible future.  In perhaps 5 years, then former President still will want to keep active.  Trump invites a wrestling contest, Trump will take on first: Arnold Schwartzenegger, 
  They will battle in the new White House Ball Room.  Trump wins, and then takes on Stallone.  Trump wins again.  Next, he takes on Berny Sanders.  Though tired, the 85 year-old former, former President will next take on a younger competitor.  Trump asserts, We bought Manhattan Island from the Indians for about $24 in trinkets centuries ago.  Now we want to take it back from an Indian again.  If Trump wins, he demands the new Mayor Mamdani, born in Africa but of Indian heritage resign as Mayor. Trump, in his 4th wrestling match of the day, begins strong, then holds his heart and stops moving.  Suddenly, an observer stumbles on the cables, and the media coverage goes blank.  Did Mamdani win and remain Mayor of America's largest city?  Did Trump die?  Or recover.  When the cables blanked out, so did my access to the future story.  We will all have to wait till 2031 to find out those answers.

   The match is broadcast into  prisons, and when the Enduros hear that, they assumed Trump was no more, so they changed their name again, this time to the Cheerios.  And from Ireland and France, a similar note.  Rosie O'Donnell and the Clooneys became Cheerios too.

Everyone holds his breath in the future, will Trump win the match against Mamdani?  Will Trump live?   But we must wait for the answers to that simple story.

Today, in 2026 everyone holds his breath, - for what is Trump going to do today?  Some hate him.  I voted for him in 3 elections for president.  I generally support him, but not always.  Trump is an action president.  

So far so good, but his brash actions?  

So far, so good.  Hope you all worry a bit about the President and his deals - some of which are good, but too much confidence might lead to big, big problems.  Remember when Trump was campaigning for President in 2024 in Butler, Pennsylvania, a young man shot at him.  The shooter killed a man in the audience, and nipped the ear of Trump, blood flowing down his cheek.  Had the assassin aimed an inch over, Trump would have died.  Biden had provided Trump a most incompetent Secret Service protection group that day.  A few days later, another man discovered with a rifle on a golf course, waiting to get Trump too.  Anyone who would survive these assassins must get an ego boost.  The feeling: I can do anything; and I can get away with everything.  A wonderful feeling, but NOT a reality.  Trump is leader of the USA, but there are other nations on earth, some quite powerful.  We must not fumble, arrogantly encouraging all the other powerful nations to join in an alliance against us.  As strong as America is, as confident as Trump feels, overconfidence can lead him, and his nation, to disaster.  We are not the world.  We are a rich, free, powerful nation; but even our nation has limits.

Hugh Murray

WHILE THE MASS MEDIA AND DEMOCRATS SEEM ENRAPTURED WITH EACH NEW PHOTO, AND LETTER FROM THE EPSTEAIN FILES, WE FORGET WHAT MAY BE THE LAST HOPE TO GET SOME TRUTH ABOUT WHO KILLED JFK IN DALLAS IN 1963

 I asked Google AI the following question.  It's answers demand further questions and answers.  Will they ever open the real files?

I attended PTS Beauregard Junior High for a year with Oswald.  I never knew him, though it is possible I may have asked him, "How much is this?" as we moved through a lunch line.  About 1,000 students, I was in the 9the grade classes; he was in the 8th.  If he ever attended Warren Easton Senior High, he did so for less than a month, and again, I did not know him.  At Easton, I had met Banister's daughter, Mary Jane' she was the date of a friend Tex Sanders and we had double dated to go to the large Saenger Theater on Canal St. to see "Rebel without a Cause."  The theater was packed and at the film's conclusio, it seemed the packed theater exhaled a breath of relief.  All the tv family programs of that era, like Father Knows Best, the Nelson Family (with little Ricky) were families that were all terrific, a minor problem each week, solved within a half hour.  None of the families of Rebel were ideal, Sal Mineo's never appeared, Natalie Wood's dad slapped her and called her a slut; James Dean's was usually wearing an apron and not heading the family against the mom's dominance.  The film itself was a Rebellion against the 1950s illusions of comfort and conformity.

Mary Jane and I met then for the first time.  We both attended Easton, and she had heard disturbing things about me.  She was concerned, worried, I might be moving into the communist camp, talking about race-mixing and things like that.  She thought I should meet her dad, who was an expert on the subject as he had been a leader of the FBI in Chicago before coming to New Orleans.  (Indeed, Banister had been Acting Superintendent of the New Orleans Police for a time).  He now headed a detective agency, and Mary Jane urged me to come to their home and talk to her dad, and get some sense in my head.  I went to her home, and Guy was then sorting mail, standing by a table.  I approached and introduced myself; he grunted, and kept sorting.  I was the only one speaking, and kept it short.  Mary Jane was a pleasant, likeable gal, and I did what she requested, and Guy probably did too.  Clearly neither of us were enthused about the meeting, but to please her we did so.  Later I learned that Banister was one of the "conservatives" who would pay young people to spy on youthful radicals.  I will discuss more on the atmosphere in New Orleans in that era in the forthcoming book.

In summer of 1963 I entered the Tulane Library and on a small table in the foyer was a stack of leaflets [ Fair Play for Cuba Committee, what many deemed a pro-Castro organization.  I picked up one; there was no one else around.  Iread it later and discussed it with a grad student in philosophy.  Hae either of us sent a letter to the address on the leaflet, it would have ended in the office of anti-com Guy Banister.

Are we really to assume that the Fed. Govt. had no files on Oswald with Banister, David Ferrie, the CIA training camp north of Lake Pontchartrain shut down in July 1963?  Stop forcing the Dept. of Justice to go through every Epstein pimple, and go to WHO MURDERED JFK.

Hugh Murray

why did "marxist" Lee Oswald work with staunch anti-communist Guy Banister in New Orleans in 1963 on the Fair Play for Cuba Committee?

The relationship between the Marxist Lee Harvey Oswald and the staunchly anti-communist Guy Banister in New Orleans during the summer of 1963 is a central mystery in JFK assassination research. While official government investigations generally concluded Oswald was a "loner," evidence and testimony suggest their collaboration served specific, often conflicting, tactical goals

. 

Key Evidence of the Connection

• Shared Address (544 Camp Street): Oswald distributed Fair Play for Cuba Committee (FPCC) leaflets that were stamped with the address 
  544 Camp Street
  . This was the side entrance to the Newman Building, which also housed Banister's private detective agency at 
  531 Lafayette Street
  .
• Witness Testimony: Banister’s secretary, Delphine Roberts, stated that Oswald visited the office frequently and "seemed to be on familiar terms with Banister". She also claimed Banister explicitly told her Oswald was "one of ours" and was working for him.
• Proximity to CIA-Linked Figures: Banister was a former FBI official who ran an anti-communist intelligence network and worked with David Ferrie, an anti-Castro pilot who had known Oswald since the Civil Air Patrol. 

Primary Theories for Their Cooperation

There are several major theories explaining why these two ideological opposites would work together:

• Establishing a "Legend" (Cover Story): Researchers suggest Banister was helping Oswald build a public persona as a fanatical pro-Castro Marxist. This "legend" could serve as cover for infiltrating leftist groups or, as some theorists argue, to later frame Oswald as a Cuban asset in the event of an assassination.
• Provocateur Operations: Evidence suggests Oswald’s FPCC activities were designed to provoke reactions. For example, Oswald staged a street fight while handing out leaflets to gain media attention and bolster his pro-Castro image, which some believe was a tactic to flush out communist sympathizers for Banister.
• Intelligence Infiltration: Some believe Oswald was a low-level informant or "asset" for the FBI or CIA. In this scenario, Banister, who maintained close ties with government agencies, acted as a handler while Oswald attempted to infiltrate the DRE (Directorio Revolucionario Estudiantil), a CIA-funded anti-Castro group.
• Anti-Castro Schemes: Delphine Roberts believed their association was related to anti-Castro operations, potentially including gun-running or training Cuban exiles, activities Banister was known to support. 

Despite these accounts, the Warren Commission did not find credible evidence of a link, and the CIA has historically denied any official relationship with either man. However, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) later acknowledged that Oswald did indeed associate with anti-communist figures in New Orleans. 

FROM RT - A STANFORD U STUDY ON POSSIBLE HARMFUL EFFECTS OF COVID VAX

 

Covid vaccines linked to heart damage – study

Certain jabs can cause immune cells to attack the body, leading to myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in young men, scientists say

FILE PHOTO. Doctor prepares vaccine syringe. © Getty Images / Luis Alvarez

Certain Covid-19 vaccines can trigger immune responses that may inflame heart tissue and lead to potentially fatal complications in rare cases, with young men being especially susceptible, according to a new study.

The paper, authored by Stanford University researchers and published in the Science Translational Medicine journal, examined why some patients developed myocarditis or pericarditis after receiving mRNA jabs such as those produced by Pfizer and Moderna.

Researchers found that immune cells can, in some cases, recognize the foreign RNA delivered by the vaccines and mount a strong response. In rare instances, this response has led to the release of large amounts of cytokines – immune-signaling proteins that can damage heart cells. 

Vaccine-associated myocarditis has occurred in about one in 140,000 people after a first dose and around one in 32,000 after a second dose, according to figures cited by The Telegraph, with incidence peaking among males aged 30 or younger. 

Read more

 US disease control chief fired in clash over Covid vaccines

Symptoms have included chest pain, shortness of breath, fever and palpitations, typically appearing within days of vaccination. Most patients have recovered quickly, although hospitalization and deaths have been reported in rare cases.

The findings come as the US Food and Drug Administration reportedly intends to place a “black box” warning, the agency’s most serious safety label, on Covid-19 vaccines, according to CNN. The warning would alert consumers to risks such as myocarditis and pericarditis, although the plan has not been finalized.

Covid-19 vaccines were developed and authorized rapidly after the World Health Organization declared a coronavirus pandemic in March 2020 and were later mandated in many countries.  The rollout proved controversial, with critics claiming the jabs were poorly tested and that side effects posed greater risks than the virus itself.

However, scientists and regulators have maintained that Covid-19 infection carries a greater overall risk of serious illness and long-term complications than vaccination, and have stressed that the benefits of immunization outweigh the short-term risks of rare heart-related side effects.

You can share this story on social media:

Follow RT on

Coronavirus vaccinesModerna Covid-19 vaccinePfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine

Dear readers! Thank you for your vibrant engagement with our content and for sharing your points of view. Please note that we have switched to a new commenting system. To leave comments, you will need to register. We are working on some adjustments so if you have questions or suggestions feel free to send them to feedback@rttv.ru. Please check our commenting policy

15 Dec, 2025 03:40

US military plane nearly collides with passenger jet near Venezuela – media

A refueling aircraft with its transponder reportedly off flew dangerously close to a JetBlue airliner

FILE PHOTO: A JetBlue Airbus A321 is on the runway after landing at Adolfo Suarez Airport in Madrid, Spain, on October 12, 2025. ©  Joan Valls / Urbanandsport / NurPhoto / Getty Images

A passenger airliner nearly collided mid-flight with a US military aircraft near the Venezuelan coast on Friday, the Associated Press and the New York Times reported, citing radio communications and flight tracking data.

The incident occurred amid a US naval buildup in the Caribbean and President Donald Trump’s threats to strike “narcoterrorists” on Venezuelan soil.

JetBlue Flight 1112 reportedly encountered a US Air Force refueling tanker while traveling from Curaçao, a small island off the coast of Venezuela, to New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Twenty minutes after takeoff, the airliner suddenly lost altitude mid-climb. “We almost had a midair collision up here,” the JetBlue pilot was quoted as saying. “They passed directly in our flight path ... They don’t have their transponder turned on; it’s outrageous.”

Read more

 Trump teases land strikes in Venezuela ‘soon’

JetBlue spokesman Derek Dombrowski said on Sunday that the airline had reported the incident to the authorities. “Our crew members are trained on proper procedures for various flight situations, and we appreciate our crew for promptly reporting this situation to our leadership team,” he said.

US Southern Command spokesman Colonel Manny Ortiz said they were “aware of the recent reporting regarding US military aircraft operations in the Caribbean and are currently reviewing the matter.” He added that safety remained a top priority and the military was “working through the appropriate channels to assess the facts surrounding the situation.”

Since September, the US has killed more than 80 people in strikes on alleged cartel boats, which Trump claimed were being used by the Venezuelan government to “flood” the US with drugs. Venezuela has denied any involvement in drug trafficking and said the strikes were part of a “colonialist” plan to topple President Nicolas Maduro and plunder the country’s natural resources.