THOUGHTS ON ELECTION, NOV. 3, 2020 AND ON CORONA VIRUS

To All, 

    With the demands by Democrats for ever more voting by mail, and with various rules by states as to when these ballots must be returned to be counted, America may not know who has won the election on the night of November 3, 2020.  Conservative radio hosts have asserted that the Biden campaign has gathered over 70 attorneys who will litigate the election results.  I suspect the Republicans will have their teams of lawyers, too.  But what is strange, is it true that the Democrats have sent out a call for Russian embalmers - like the ones who have kept Lenin looking alive though he died nearly a century ago in 1924.  Their techniques have been used on leaders of North Korea, and even in Venezuela.  Why would the Democrats be interested in such experts when Joe Biden is so sprightly?

 

I am joking about the embalmers, but Woodrow Wilson's wife suddenly had great powers when the President fell ill after WWI.  Could we end with a virtual, but deceased President in the White House, but still making speeches?   Hugh Murray 

       POLICE AND IMMUNITY & DOCTORS AND IMMUNITY

    Protestors, rioters, and many Democrats, following the video of 4 Minneapolis kneeling on George Floye, and his death, many demanded not only the defunding of police, but also the end of qualified immunity for police officers who engage in struggles with people who may engage in crime.  If this threat were to be enacted, then police could be sued for damages and in other ways by perpetrators and their families.

    Dr. Fauci and other American medical officials who work in the national and state health bureaucracies are adamant that hydroxychloroquine HCQ should not be used to cure or as a preventative against the corona virus.  Yet, doctors who have patients with the virus have used HCQ and many found the results positive.  On a video, a Nigerian woman doctor claimed to have cured over 300 patients using HCQ, and she was familiar with the drug as she had used it in Nigeria where malaria is a major problem.  She also asked when was the last time the famous Dr. Fauci used his stethoscope on a patient.  Fauci, who has worked in for decades in the Federal health bureaucracy may not have had any corona virus patients.  One doctor, a frequent guest on Fox, a man about 60 told of an elderly patient of his, a man suffering with the virus, and fading fast.  He gave him HCQ and the old man quickly recovered.  His elderly patient who recovered was his own father.    I have heard other doctors discuss their personal experience using HCQ with possitive results (usually zinc and other drugs may be used with it).

    Fauci and the Establishment reject these examples.  They demaned the video be suppressed.  They also demand that the drug be suppressed.  In some states, health commissioners are even willing to revoke licenses of doctors who prescribe HCQ.  They have pushed pharmacies not to fulfill doctor's prescriptions when patients bring it in.  The Establishment cites studies where large doses of HCQ were given to patients with bad side effects.  But the Front Line doctors said the amount given in those studies was far too much and was toxic.  A much smaller amount is required, and it is very cheap.

    Indeed, the very inexpensiveness of HCQ may be one reason Fauci and the Establishment are so hostile to it.  They prefer other drugs that may cost a patient not $20 bit $2,000.

    If HCQ can save lives, and if doctors in the Establishment are preventing its use, can those who die from the virus have their families sue the Establishment doctors?  Is there a qualified immunity for the bureaucrats so that they can deny the public and other doctors information; AND deny doctors and patients access to the medicine that could save lives?