MAJ. HASAN IS SANE; LIBERALISM IS NOT

For those abroad, Major Hasan was in the military, and four years ago took his weapon onto the military base and shot and killed 13 or 14 people.  The Obama Administration did not want to call it a terror attack, so it was classified as workplace violence.  Last week, his court appointed attorneys sought to take control of the case from Hasan, for they thought him insane, because he would not follow their advice and instead was trying to get the court to condemn him to death.  The government attorneys are as politically correct as much of America society.  That means, they are incorrect.  They are so blind they cannot understand that Hasan wants to take a political stand at his trial.  He is willing to risk his life to present his case - the case for Muslim jihad, for killing the enemies of Islam.  Malkin exposes some of the insanity about the case: fellow officers were aware Hasan was a Muslim jihadist, but did nothing about it for the Dept. of Justice would have charged them with racism and bigotry - the worst crimes in Obama's new America.  Also, our military bases are disarmed!  Only civilian police had weapons and could halt the murderous rage of Hasan.  In America, many will conclude that Hasan is insane because he shot and killed fellow service men and women.  In America, many are willfully blind and refuse to comprehend that Hasan, like the suicide bombers, is willing to lose his life for the cause, in his case, the cause of Islam.  Hasan is not alone, nor is he the only Muslim jihadist in the US Army.  What IS insane are American policies that made fellow officers afraid to condemn Hasan when he spoke, and disarmed fellow officer so they were unable to defend themselves when Hasan began shooting and killing.  Liberalism is the lunacy.  Hasan should have been executed years ago, but like most murderers in the US, his case drags on and on.  
     Hasan was an army psychiatrist.  Can you imagine how he "helped" soldiers suffering from problems of killing the enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan?
     Major Hasan was a soldier.  He proclaimed he was a soldier of Islam.  He thought it; he said it; he acted upon in.  He killed fellow American soldiers in his war for Islam - a war against the West.  Hasan is not insane.  He is an enemy of the West and Western values.  If the Hasans win, we will be subjected to sharia law.  If the Hasans win, Western Civilization will be destroyed.  He is the enemy.  He acted upon his evil jihadist beliefs.  He should have been executed years ago.
--------HUGH MURRAY

Three Forgotten Facts About the Fort Hood Massacre

By Michelle Malkin on August 6, 2013 at 7:21pm

Finally. Four years after Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Texas, and perpetrated the bloodiest massacre ever on an American military base, the self-confessed jihadist's court martial proceedings began this week. Have you forgotten?

Americans obsessed over the O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias trials. Gun-control lobbyists turned Newtown, Aurora andTucson into national awareness-raising, fundraising and legislation-promoting campaigns. But where are the celebrity lobbyists and high-profile advocates for the victims of bloodthirsty Muslim vigilante Nidal Hasan?

The White House, which downplayed the terrorist mass murder as"workplace violence," exacerbated national apathy for his evil acts. Our soldiers deserve better. Here are three facts you've probably forgotten—or never knew—about the Fort Hood terror spree.

• --Fourteen victims fell on Nov. 5, 2009, not 13. Thirteen of our U.S. military personnel died in cold blood at the deployment center. But the death toll was actually 14. Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, was pregnant when Hasan shot her during the first round of gunfire. At a military Article 32 hearing in 2010 (analogous to a civilian grand jury hearing), a survivor of the Fort Hood shootings testified that Velez cried out, "My baby! My baby!"
  In his opening statement on Tuesday, Hasan (acting as his own lawyer) apologized to his fellow jihadists for not destroying more innocent life.
• --The victims were all unarmed. Soldiers inside the deployment center were and are forbidden from carrying weapons—either issued weapons or personal arms—on base. When Hasan commenced his shooting spree by shouting, "Allahu Akbar," several brave men and women in uniform used chairs, tables and their own bodies to try to stop him. But it wasn't until a courageous, armed civilian police officer,Sgt. Kimberley Munley, arrived on the scene with her 9mm Beretta that Hasan's rampage was interrupted.
  In a gunfight outside the deployment center, Munley wounded Hasan—who was able to return fire and shot her in the hand, thigh and knee. While she lay on the ground, Hasan kicked away her weapon. Another armed civilian police officer, Mark Todd, was able to fire at Hasan five times and brought him down.
  Gun-control zealots led by the Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence exploited Fort Hood to argue for even tighter gun restrictions. But it was a 1993 Clinton administration gun-control directive banning most military personnel from carrying their arms for personal protection that facilitated Hasan's massacre except under very limited circumstances. Despite the death of 13 soldiers and the wounding of more than 30 at Fort Hood by a jihadist who warned his superiors that Muslim soldiers posed a specific threat, gun-free military base policies remain in place.
• --Hasan's military colleagues were more concerned with being accused of discrimination than with ridding our military of this known, deranged Islamic radical. In 2007, two years before he carried out his homicidal plan, Hasan laid out his murderous means, motives and Koranic inspiration for all to see.

His PowerPoint slide presentation to fellow Army doctors was titled: "The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military." Hasan warned: "It's getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims." And: "We love death more then (sic) you love life!" As first reported by Pamela Geller, Hasan carried an official calling card with the designation "SoA (SWT)"—for "Soldier of Allah" and "Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala" (Islamic for "Glory to Him, the Exalted").

Hasan told his superiors he was not alone among Muslim soldiers who believed they "should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly."

He reminded the Army of the fatal 2003 fragging attack on American soldiers in Kuwait by Sgt. Hasan Akbar (who was sentenced to death but remains alive while his case drags on in appeal) and the desertion case of Lebanon-born Muslim Marine Wassef Ali Hassoun.

A Joint Terrorism Task Force had been monitoring Hasan's communications with jihad spiritual leader Anwar al-Awlaki all along. But the military was not notified. Even without that information, military officers expressed concerns privately that Hasan might leak classified information to terror groups if he were deployed and that he was capable of committing a fragging.

Yet, they were prepared to deploy him anyway and did nothing to remove him from his job. One email from an Army investigator before the Fort Hood massacre fretted: "Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we'd have been crucified."

Instead, 13 soldiers and one unborn child were slaughtered and paid with their lives for our country's reckless political correctness and bureaucratic fecklessness.

Michelle Malkin [email her] is the author of Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists, Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s review. Click here for Michelle Malkin's website. Michelle Malkin is also author of Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild and Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies